Juste(s) titre(s) : l’économie liminaire du Roman bourgeois

Le roman bourgeois est en général considéré comme une oeuvre plus ou moins bâclée, un burlesque de deuxième ordre, racheté seulement, çà et là, par les quelques touches de description « réaliste » qu’il recèle. Nous croyons toutefois que lire ce roman selon une grille de lecture héritée du xixe siècle serait passer à côté du véritable intérêt du livre. Au lieu de considérer l’apparent désordre du récit — les historiettes détachées, les bribes de listes, la structure boîteuse, l’absence de personnage principal, la méchanceté grincheuse envers Charles Sorel, la terminaison arbitraire —, comme une tare qu’il faut condamner (ou excuser), cet article veut suggérer qu’il s’agit d’une décision stratégique de la part de Furetière dans une tentative globale de représenter une nouvelle commensurabilité esthétique qui serait propre à la bourgeoisie. C’est par le livre, objet à la fois commercial et esthétique, par un jeu polysémique autour du titre et enfin par une réflexion sur l’échange même que Furetière arrive à négocier quelques-unes des incommensurablités qui traversent la société du xviie siècle.Le roman bourgeois is usually seen as a more or less failed work, a second-order burlesque, redeemed only by the touches of incipient realism which shine through its disarticulated narrative. But to read this work through an interpretive framework provided by the nineteenth-century novel would be to miss much of its real value. Instead of considering its apparent lack of structure as a fault to be condemned or excused, this article takes these vices as virtues, reading the novel less as an attempt by Furetière to represent the “reality” of the bourgeoisie than to question the epistemological and social bases of its own representation. It is through the book, taken both as a commercial good and an aesthetic object, the title, understood principally as a polysemic signifier, and finally through a reflection on the exchange itself that Furetière is able to negotiate a number of incommensurabilites characteristic of French seventeenth-century society

Transcriptomic analysis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma reveals a multi-gene prognostic signature associated with metastasis

Background: Metastasis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is uncommon. Current staging methods are reported to have sub-optimal performances in metastasis prediction. Accurate identification of patients with tumours at high risk of metastasis would have a significant impact on management.Objective: To develop a robust and validated gene expression profile (GEP) signature for predicting primary cSCC metastatic risk using an unbiased whole transcriptome discovery-driven approach.Methods: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary cSCC with perilesional normal tissue from 237 immunocompetent patients (151 non-metastasising and 86 metastasising) were collected retrospectively from four centres. TempO-seq was used to probe the whole transcriptome and machine learning algorithms were applied to derive predictive signatures, with a 3:1 split for training and testing datasets.Results: A 20-gene prognostic model was developed and validated, with an accuracy of 86.0%, sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 86.1%, and positive predictive value of 78.3% in the testing set, providing more stable, accurate prediction than pathological staging systems. A linear predictor was also developed, significantly correlating with metastatic risk.Limitations: This was a retrospective 4-centre study and larger prospective multicentre studies are now required.Conclusion: The 20-gene signature prediction is accurate, with the potential to be incorporated into clinical workflows for cSCC

Transcriptomic analysis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma reveals a multi-gene prognostic signature associated with metastasis.

BackgroundMetastasis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is uncommon. Current staging methods are reported to have sub-optimal performances in metastasis prediction. Accurate identification of patients with tumours at high risk of metastasis would have a significant impact on management.ObjectiveTo develop a robust and validated gene expression profile (GEP) signature for predicting primary cSCC metastatic risk using an unbiased whole transcriptome discovery-driven approach.MethodsArchival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary cSCC with perilesional normal tissue from 237 immunocompetent patients (151 non-metastasising and 86 metastasising) were collected retrospectively from four centres. TempO-seq was used to probe the whole transcriptome and machine learning algorithms were applied to derive predictive signatures, with a 3:1 split for training and testing datasets.ResultsA 20-gene prognostic model was developed and validated, with an accuracy of 86.0%, sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 86.1%, and positive predictive value of 78.3% in the testing set, providing more stable, accurate prediction than pathological staging systems. A linear predictor was also developed, significantly correlating with metastatic risk.LimitationsThis was a retrospective 4-centre study and larger prospective multicentre studies are now required.ConclusionThe 20-gene signature prediction is accurate, with the potential to be incorporated into clinical workflows for cSCC

Transcriptomic analysis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma reveals a multi-gene prognostic signature associated with metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is uncommon. Current staging methods are reported to have sub-optimal performances in metastasis prediction. Accurate identification of patients with tumours at high risk of metastasis would have a significant impact on management. OBJECTIVE: To develop a robust and validated gene expression profile (GEP) signature for predicting primary cSCC metastatic risk using an unbiased whole transcriptome discovery-driven approach. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary cSCC with perilesional normal tissue from 237 immunocompetent patients (151 non-metastasising and 86 metastasising) were collected retrospectively from four centres. TempO-seq was used to probe the whole transcriptome and machine learning algorithms were applied to derive predictive signatures, with a 3:1 split for training and testing datasets. RESULTS: A 20-gene prognostic model was developed and validated, with an accuracy of 86.0%, sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 86.1%, and positive predictive value of 78.3% in the testing set, providing more stable, accurate prediction than pathological staging systems. A linear predictor was also developed, significantly correlating with metastatic risk. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective 4-centre study and larger prospective multicentre studies are now required. CONCLUSION: The 20-gene signature prediction is accurate, with the potential to be incorporated into clinical workflows for cSCC

Prioritising Infectious Disease Mapping.

BACKGROUND: Increasing volumes of data and computational capacity afford unprecedented opportunities to scale up infectious disease (ID) mapping for public health uses. Whilst a large number of IDs show global spatial variation, comprehensive knowledge of these geographic patterns is poor. Here we use an objective method to prioritise mapping efforts to begin to address the large deficit in global disease maps currently available. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Automation of ID mapping requires bespoke methodological adjustments tailored to the epidemiological characteristics of different types of diseases. Diseases were therefore grouped into 33 clusters based upon taxonomic divisions and shared epidemiological characteristics. Disability-adjusted life years, derived from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, were used as a globally consistent metric of disease burden. A review of global health stakeholders, existing literature and national health priorities was undertaken to assess relative interest in the diseases. The clusters were ranked by combining both metrics, which identified 44 diseases of main concern within 15 principle clusters. Whilst malaria, HIV and tuberculosis were the highest priority due to their considerable burden, the high priority clusters were dominated by neglected tropical diseases and vector-borne parasites. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A quantitative, easily-updated and flexible framework for prioritising diseases is presented here. The study identifies a possible future strategy for those diseases where significant knowledge gaps remain, as well as recognising those where global mapping programs have already made significant progress. For many conditions, potential shared epidemiological information has yet to be exploited

Prioritising Infectious Disease Mapping.

BACKGROUND: Increasing volumes of data and computational capacity afford unprecedented opportunities to scale up infectious disease (ID) mapping for public health uses. Whilst a large number of IDs show global spatial variation, comprehensive knowledge of these geographic patterns is poor. Here we use an objective method to prioritise mapping efforts to begin to address the large deficit in global disease maps currently available. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Automation of ID mapping requires bespoke methodological adjustments tailored to the epidemiological characteristics of different types of diseases. Diseases were therefore grouped into 33 clusters based upon taxonomic divisions and shared epidemiological characteristics. Disability-adjusted life years, derived from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, were used as a globally consistent metric of disease burden. A review of global health stakeholders, existing literature and national health priorities was undertaken to assess relative interest in the diseases. The clusters were ranked by combining both metrics, which identified 44 diseases of main concern within 15 principle clusters. Whilst malaria, HIV and tuberculosis were the highest priority due to their considerable burden, the high priority clusters were dominated by neglected tropical diseases and vector-borne parasites. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A quantitative, easily-updated and flexible framework for prioritising diseases is presented here. The study identifies a possible future strategy for those diseases where significant knowledge gaps remain, as well as recognising those where global mapping programs have already made significant progress. For many conditions, potential shared epidemiological information has yet to be exploited