Feasibility, safety and efficacy of human intra-tumoral immuno-therapy. Gustave Roussy's initial experience with its first 100 patients

PURPOSE Many intratumoural (IT) immunotherapies are currently developed in the clinic with the aim of overcoming primary and secondary resistance and/or to limit on-target/off-tumour toxicities of immune checkpoint targeted therapies. This study aimed to describe the feasibility, safety and efficacy of IT immunotherapy treatments. DESIGN This retrospective single-centre study included the first 100 consecutive patients enrolled in Gustave Roussy's Human IntraTumoral-ImmunoTherapy (HIT-IT) program. Patient characteristics, target description, image guidance, safety and response according to iRECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours for immunotherapy trials) were recorded. Predictive factors of complications and responses were analysed. Survival was also reported. RESULTS From 09/2015 to 05/2020, 100 patients had 115 tumours injected during 423 treatment cycles. Most frequent primary tumour arose from the skin (n = 49), digestive track (n = 4) or head and neck (n = 8). Injected tumours' mean diameter was 37 ± 23 mm, and a median number of 4 IT injections per patient (interquartile range:3-5) were performed. Targeted tumours for IT injections were superficial lymph nodes (36.5%), subcutaneous lesions (25.2%), liver tumours (20.9%) and others (17.4% including tumour sites such as deep lymph nodes or lung). Most patients (72%) received systemic immunotherapy in combination with HIT-IT. Procedure- and drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 11.3% and 33.3% of the treatment cycles, respectively. Only 3 procedure-related AEs were grade-3 (0.7%); and no grade-4 or 5 occurred. Among all cycles, 7 grade-3 and 1 grade-5 drug-related AEs were reported. Complete and partial responses were achieved for 5% and 18% of patients, respectively, while stable disease was the best response for 11%. Patients receiving HIT-IT as a 1st-line treatment (24%), or not previously pre-treated with immunotherapy (53%) responded better, p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively. From 1st cycle of IT, 12-month overall progression-free survival and overall survival were 21% (14-31%) and 57% (47-68%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study, conducted on patients with cancer and treated within clinical trials at Gustave Roussy, demonstrates the feasibility and safety of the IT immunotherapy strategy

Genomic Instability and Pro-Tumoral Inflammation are associated with Primary Resistance to Anti-PD1 + Anti-Angiogenesis in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

International audienceCancer immunotherapy combinations have recently shown to improve the overall survival of advanced mesotheliomas especially for patients responding to those treatments. We aimed to characterize the biological correlates of malignant pleural mesotheliomas primary resistance to immunotherapy and anti-angiogenics by testing the combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and nintedanib, a pan anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in the multi-center PEMBIB trial (NCT02856425). Thirty patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma were treated and explored. Unexpectedly, we found that refractory patients were actively recruiting CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells in their tumors through CXCL9 tumor release upon treatment. However, these patients displayed high levels of somatic copy number alterations in their tumors that correlated with high blood and tumor levels of IL-6 and CXCL8. Those pro-inflammatory cytokines resulted in higher tumor secretion of VEGF and tumor enrichment in regulatory T-cells. Advanced mesothelioma should further benefit from stratified combination therapies adapted to their tumor biology

Elevated Calprotectin and Abnormal Myeloid Cell Subsets Discriminate Severe from Mild COVID-19

International audienc