779 research outputs found

    Letter from Griggs County Sheriff A. I Monson to Attorney General Langer Regarding Beverages and Tobacco Sold in Griggs Country, 1917

    Get PDF
    Letter dated July 21, 1917 from Griggs County Sheriff A. I Monson to Attorney General Langer listing beverages and tobacco products sold, and by what people or establishments, in Griggs Country.https://commons.und.edu/langer-papers/1285/thumbnail.jp

    Why are estimates of global isoprene emissions so similar (and why is this not so for monoterpenes)?

    No full text
    International audienceEmissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC) are a chief uncertainty in calculating the burdens of important atmospheric compounds like tropospheric ozone or secondary organic aerosol, reflecting either imperfect chemical oxidation mechanisms or unreliable emission estimates, or both. To provide a starting point for a more systematic discussion we review here global isoprene and monoterpene emission estimates to-date. We note a surprisingly small variation in the predictions of global isoprene emission rate that is in stark contrast with our lack of process understanding and the small number of observations for model parameterisation and evaluation. Most of the models are based on similar emission algorithms, using fixed values for the emission capacity of various plant functional types. In some studies these values are very similar, but they differ substantially in others. The models differ also broadly with regard to their representation of net primary productivity, method of biome coverage determination and climate data. Their similarities with regard to the global isoprene emission rate would suggest that the dominant parameters driving the ultimate global estimate, and thus the dominant determinant of model sensitivity, are the specific emission algorithm and isoprene emission capacity. Contrary to isoprene, monoterpene estimates show significantly larger model-to-model variation although variation in terms of leaf algorithm, emission capacities, the way of model upscaling, vegetation cover or climatology used in terpene models are comparable to those used for isoprene. From our summary of published studies there appears to be no evidence that the terrestrial modelling community has been any more successful in "resolving unknowns" in the mechanisms that control global isoprene emissions, compared to global monoterpene emissions. Rather, the proliferation of common parameterization schemes within a large variety of model platforms lends the illusion of convergence towards a common estimate of global isoprene emissions. This convergence might be used to provide optimism that the community has reached the "relief phase", the phase when sufficient process understanding and data for evaluation allows for models to converge, when applying a recently proposed concept. We argue that there is no basis for this apparent "relief" phase. Rather, we urge modellers to be bolder in their analysis to draw attention to the fact that terrestrial emissions, particularly in the area of biome-specific emission capacities, are unknown rather than uncertain

    The Iowa Homemaker vol.21, no.3

    Get PDF
    Freshmen – Please Note, page 2 Hospital Research, Ann Koebel, page 3 Orchids to Pat, page 4 The Army Eats Well, Mary I. Barber, page 5 Making Things Grow, Betty Ann Iverson, page 6 Look Before You Snap, Kathryn Monson, page 7 Major Departments on Review, Elizabeth Murfield, page 8 Patriotic Sally, Patricia Hayes, page 10 What’s New in Home Economics, Dorothy Olson, page 12 Summer Job Holders Reap Experience, page 14 A List of Don’ts, Costume Design Class, page 15 We Salute Campus Leaders, Margaret Kirchner, page 16 Home Economics Looks to Future, M. L. Morton, page 17 Behind Bright Jackets, Julie Wendel, page 18 Alums in the News, Mary Elizabeth Sather, page 20 Nutrition for Defense, Dorothy Ann Roost, page 22 That Personal Touch, Margaret Ann Clarke, page 23 Journalistic Spindles, Elizabeth Hanson, page 2

    Radiocarbon constraint on relict organic carbon contributions to Ross Sea sediments

    Get PDF
    Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2006. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 7 (2006): Q04012, doi:10.1029/2005GC001097.We estimate the relative contribution of relict organic matter to the acid-insoluble organic carbon (AIOC) fraction of surface sediments from Ross Sea, Antarctica, on the basis of 14C abundance. The bulk isotopic characteristics of AIOC can largely be explained by simple two-source models of modern and relict organic carbon, when samples are grouped according to two geographical regions, namely, southwestern and south central Ross Sea. This spatial variability in relict organic carbon could be controlled by proximity to the edge of the Ross Ice Shelf and ice drainage areas. Radiocarbon abundance in the AIOC is potentially an excellent tool to estimate the contribution of relict organic carbon in the Antarctic margin sediments.This work was partly supported by a grant from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to N.O

    Scaling study of the pion electroproduction cross sections and the pion form factor

    Full text link
    The 1^{1}H(e,e′π+e,e^\prime \pi^+)n cross section was measured for a range of four-momentum transfer up to Q2Q^2=3.91 GeV2^2 at values of the invariant mass, WW, above the resonance region. The Q2Q^2-dependence of the longitudinal component is consistent with the Q2Q^2-scaling prediction for hard exclusive processes. This suggests that perturbative QCD concepts are applicable at rather low values of Q2Q^2. Pion form factor results, while consistent with the Q2Q^2-scaling prediction, are inconsistent in magnitude with perturbative QCD calculations. The extraction of Generalized Parton Distributions from hard exclusive processes assumes the dominance of the longitudinal term. However, transverse contributions to the cross section are still significant at Q2Q^2=3.91 GeV2^2.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figure

    Nuclear transparency and effective kaon-nucleon cross section from the A(e, e'K+) reaction

    Full text link
    We have determined the transparency of the nuclear medium to kaons from A(e,e′K+)A(e,e^{'} K^{+}) measurements on 12^{12}C, 63^{63}Cu, and 197^{197}Au targets. The measurements were performed at the Jefferson Laboratory and span a range in four-momentum-transfer squared Q2^2=1.1 -- 3.0 GeV2^2. The nuclear transparency was defined as the ratio of measured kaon electroproduction cross sections with respect to deuterium, (σA/σD\sigma^{A}/\sigma^{D}). We further extracted the atomic number (AA) dependence of the transparency as parametrized by T=(A/2)α−1T= (A/2)^{\alpha-1} and, within a simple model assumption, the in-medium effective kaon-nucleon cross sections. The effective cross sections extracted from the electroproduction data are found to be smaller than the free cross sections determined from kaon-nucleon scattering experiments, and the parameter α\alpha was found to be significantly larger than those obtained from kaon-nucleus scattering. We have included similar comparisons between pion- and proton-nucleon effective cross sections as determined from electron scattering experiments, and pion-nucleus and proton-nucleus scattering data.Comment: 7 pages, 5 figure

    Study of the A(e,e'Ï€+\pi^+) Reaction on 1^1H, 2^2H, 12^{12}C, 27^{27}Al, 63^{63}Cu and 197^{197}Au

    Full text link
    Cross sections for the p(e,e′π+e,e'\pi^{+})n process on 1^1H, 2^2H, 12^{12}C, 27^{27}Al, 63^{63}Cu and 197^{197}Au targets were measured at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab) in order to extract the nuclear transparencies. Data were taken for four-momentum transfers ranging from Q2Q^2=1.1 to 4.8 GeV2^2 for a fixed center of mass energy of WW=2.14 GeV. The ratio of σL\sigma_L and σT\sigma_T was extracted from the measured cross sections for 1^1H, 2^2H, 12^{12}C and 63^{63}Cu targets at Q2Q^2 = 2.15 and 4.0 GeV2^2 allowing for additional studies of the reaction mechanism. The experimental setup and the analysis of the data are described in detail including systematic studies needed to obtain the results. The results for the nuclear transparency and the differential cross sections as a function of the pion momentum at the different values of Q2Q^2 are presented. Global features of the data are discussed and the data are compared with the results of model calculations for the p(e,e′π+e,e'\pi^{+})n reaction from nuclear targets.Comment: 28 pages, 19 figures, submited to PR
    • …
    corecore