Anamnesis y examen físico

El método más efectivo para el diagnóstico de alergia alimentaria es la historia clínica, que comprende la anamnesis y el examen físico. La anamnesis debe incluir el interrogatorio dirigido y detallado, y junto con el examen físico aportarán los datos necesarios para orientar hacia el diagnóstica, y sugerir si la fisiopatología es mediada o no por IgE, lo que es pertinente para la selección e interpretación de las pruebas específicas y establecer el diagnóstico certero, además de evaluar la posibilidad de distinguir entre los distintos diagnósticos diferenciales.La expresión de la alergia alimentaria está influenciada por factores de riesgo no modificables que incluyen sexo, raza y genética (familiares), y factores modificables: dermatitis atópica, deficiencia de vitamina D, dieta con alta cantidad de grasas poliinsaturadas y deficiente de antioxidantes, consumo de fármacos antiácidos, obesidad, aumento de la higiene, influencia de la microbiota, tiempo y vía de exposición de los alimentos (mayor riesgo al retrasar la ingestión oral de alérgenos y concomitante exposición ambiental de los mismos que conduce a sensibilización y alergia)

Latin American anaphylaxis registry

Background: Recent data about clinical features, triggers and management of anaphylaxis in Latin America is lacking. Objective: To provide updated and extended data on anaphylaxis in this region. Method: An online questionnaire was used, with 67 allergy units involved from 12 Latin-American countries and Spain. Among data recorded, demographic information, clinical features, severity, triggering agents, and treatment were received. Results: Eight hundred and seventeen anaphylactic reactions were recorded. No difference in severity, regardless of pre-existing allergy or asthma history was found. Drug induced anaphylaxis (DIA) was most frequent (40.6%), followed by food induced anaphylaxis (FIA) (32.9%) and venom induced anaphylaxis (VIA) (12%). FIA and VIA were more common in children-adolescents. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA) were the most frequent drugs involved. Milk (61.1% of FIA) and egg (15.4% of FIA) in children, and shellfish (25.5% of FIA), fresh fruits (14.2% of FIA), and fish (11.3% of FIA) in adults were the most common FIA triggers. Fire ants were the most frequent insect triggers, and they induced more severe reactions than triggers of FIA and DIA (p < 0.0001). Epinephrine was used in 43.8% of anaphylaxis episodes. After Emergency Department treatment, epinephrine was prescribed to 13% of patients. Conclusions: Drugs (NSAIDs and BLA), foods (milk and egg in children and shellfish, fruits and fish in adults) and fire ants were the most common inducers of anaphylaxis. Epinephrine was used in less than half of the episodes emphasizing the urgent need to improve dissemination and implementation of anaphylaxis guidelines.Revisión por pare

Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions (HDR) In Latin America : Similarities and Differences Between Children and Adults

HDR are frequent motives for consultation in Allergology services. Possible etiologic factors and clinical presentation differences between Latin American children and adults have not been described yet.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Drug-induced anaphylaxis, elicitors, risk factors, and management in Latin America

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequent triggers of drug-induced anaphylaxis in Latín America, whereas antibiotics elicited faster onset and more scvere reactions. An improvement was observed in epinephrinc use and adherence to guidelines in the emergency department treatment of anaphylaxis in Latín America compared with our last report.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Physician's experience on managing asthma in adolescents: results of the International AMADO (Asthma Management in ADOlescents) survey

International audienceBackground: Worldwide prevalence of asthma seems to be increasing in adolescents, but limited data is available regarding the management of asthma in this age group.Objective: Therefore, we conducted an international survey focused on physicians who manage asthma in order to understand how Asthma Management in ADOlescents (AMADO) is currently performed.Methods: The AMADO survey is a web-based global survey of physician's attitudes towards the management of asthma in adolescents, circulated for 17 weeks. The survey had an anonymous and voluntary standard. The questionnaire consisted in 27 questions covering the training background of respondents, difficulties in diagnosis, and in management of asthma in adolescents.Results: Two hundred forty-four responses were received from 46 countries, from all continents. Most (65%) of participants indicated allergy as being their main specialty. The majority of participants (62%) had more than 5 years of clinical practice, but 62% have no formal training in management of adolescents with asthma. Most of participants (96%) indicated having at least one case of asthma in adolescents per month. 60% of respondents mentioned that the asthmatic adolescents only had the consultation due to the family imposition. All respondents mentioned having difficulties in the management of asthma in adolescents due to patient poor adherence. Overall, 44% of participants have no specific health care resources for adolescents in their departments. Main suggestions from the participants were: optimization of time and personalized communication to these cohort, and standardization of multidisciplinary actions to improve adherence to asthma control treatment.Conclusion: Management of asthma in adolescents is still a challenge in clinical practice. The results from this survey helped us to identify the key issues to improve clinical outcomes in the future. This survey is the first step of the international AMADO initiative, which intends to optimize diagnosis and control of asthma and prevent avoidable deaths