Futility: ein Begriff im chirurgischen Alltag?

Zusammenfassung: Ethisch anspruchsvolle Indikationsstellungen bei Patienten, die ihren Willen nicht selbst äußern können, wie beispielsweise schwer demenzkranke Patienten, konfrontieren uns häufig. Es stellt sich hierbei die Frage, ob wir mit operativen Eingriffen eine Übertherapie vollziehen. Der Begriff "futility" der Medizinethik beschreibt Übertherapie, ist allerdings für eine konkrete Anwendung problematisch, da eine exakte Definition fehlt. In der klinischen Situation von schwer demenzkranken, hochbetagten Patienten muss in chirurgischen Abteilungen eine Aufarbeitung von medizinischem Hintergrund, Lebensumständen des Patienten und belegtem oder mutmaßlichem Patientenwillen erfolgen mit dem Ziel, Indikationen individualisiert zu stellen. Nur so können diese Patienten optimal versorgt werden, eine klare Kommunikation über Behandlungsziele mit Angehörigen stattfinden sowie eine Vermeidung eines "burn out" bei den Behandelnden erreicht werden. Von großem Nutzen ist hierbei eine enge Zusammenarbeit mit Medizinethiker

Identifying the subtypes of cancer-related fatigue: results from the population-based PROFILES registry

Purpose: Little research has been done to identify possible cancer-related fatigue (CRF) subtypes and to classify cancer survivors accordingly. We aimed to identify CRF subtypes in a large population-based sample of (long term) stage I–III colorectal cancer survivors. We also identified factors associated with the CRF subtypes. Methods: Respondents completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory and other validated questionnaires on anxiety and reduced positive affect (anhedonia), sleep quality, and lifestyle factors (body mass index and physical activity). Latent class analysis was used to derive the CRF subtypes. Factors associated with the derived CRF subtypes were determined with multinomial logistic regression. Results: Three CRF classes were identified: class 1 (no fatigue and distress, n = 644, 56%), class 2 (low f

Perceived care and well-being of patients with cancer and matched norm participants in the COVID-19 crisis:Results of a survey of participants in the Dutch PROFILES registry

Importance As the resolution of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis is unforeseeable, and/or a second wave of infections may arrive in the fall of 2020, it is important to evaluate patients’ perspectives to learn from this. Oblective To assess how Dutch patients with cancer perceive cancer treatment and follow-up care (including experiences with telephone and video consultations [TC/VC]) and patients’ well-being in comparison with a norm population during the COVID-19 crisis. Design, setting, and participants Cross-sectional study of patients participating in the Dutch Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long-term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry and a norm population who completed a questionnaire from April to May 2020. Main outcomes and measures Logistic regression analysis assessed factors associated with changes in cancer care (treatment or follow-up appointment postponed/canceled or changed to TC/VC). Differences in quality of life, anxiety/depression, and loneliness between patients and age-matched and sex-matched norm participants were evaluated with regression models. Results The online questionnaire was completed by 4094 patients (48.6% response), of whom most were male (2493 [60.9%]) and had a mean (SD) age of 63.0 (11.1) years. Of these respondents, 886 (21.7%) patients received treatment; 2725 (55.6%) received follow-up care. Treatment or follow-up appointments were canceled for 390 (10.8%) patients, whereas 160 of 886 (18.1%) in treatment and 234 of 2725 (8.6%) in follow-up had it replaced by a TC/VC. Systemic therapy, active surveillance, or surgery were associated with cancellation of treatment or follow-up appointment. Younger age, female sex, comorbidities, metastasized cancer, being worried about getting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and receiving supportive care were associated with replacement of a consultation with a TC/VC. Patients and norm participants reported that the COVID-19 crisis made them contact their general practitioner (852 of 4068 [20.9%] and 218 of 979 [22.3%]) or medical specialist/nurse (585 of 4068 [14.4%] and 144 of 979 [14.7%]) less quickly when they had physical complaints or concerns. Most patients who had a TC/VC preferred a face-to-face consultation, but 151 of 394 (38.3%) were willing to use a TC/VC again. Patients with cancer were more worried about getting infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared with the 977 norm participants (917 of 4094 [22.4%] vs 175 of 977 [17.9%]). Quality of life, anxiety, and depression were comparable, but norm participants more often reported loneliness (114 of 977 [11.7%] vs 287 of 4094 [7.0%]) than patients with cancer (P = .009). Conclusions and relevance Among patients with cancer in the Netherlands, 1 in 3 reported changes in cancer care in the first weeks of the COVID-19 crisis. Long-term outcomes need to be monitored. The crisis may affect the mental well-being of the general population relatively more than that of patients with cancer

NAR 18

The Twelfth International Congress on Ancient Bronzes was held in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, from the 1st-4th June 1992 and was organized by the Provinciaal Museum G.M. Kam in cooperation with the Katholieke Universiteit, Nijmegen. As can be seen in the proceedings, a large number of contributions were offered. Because of the limited time available, some of these could only be presented in the form of posters