Réirradiations des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures : indications et résultats

International audienceDespite progress in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a significant proportion of patients previously irradiated for head-and-neck cancer will develop locoregional recurrence or a second primary. Because of the heterogeneity of this population with respect to disease-related factors (localization, volume, recurrence or second primary, time interval from previous irradiation.. .) and patient-related factors (comorbidities, sequelae of previous irradiation.. .), the optimal reirradiation treatment remains to be defined. Salvage therapy using reirradiation, despite some encouraging results, has historically been avoided because of concerns regarding toxicity. The results of more recent studies using contemporary treatment techniques and conformal delivery methods such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) have been somewhat more promising. The aim of this review is to discuss the reirradiation of HNSCC in terms of patient selection and modern radiotherapy techniques.Malgré les progrès dans la prise en charge des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supé-rieures (VADS), de nombreux patients vont développer une récidive en territoire irradié ou un second primitif. Devant la très grande hétérogénéité de ces patients, des facteurs liés à la maladie (localisa-tion, volume, récidive ou second primitif, intervalle depuis la première irradiation, etc.), des facteurs liés au patient (comorbidités, séquelles de la première irradiation.. .), les indications sont posées au cas par cas. Les données historiques de réirradiation, bien que rapportant des données d'efficacité parfois encourageantes, font état de taux de toxicité de grades 4 et 5 importants. Avec la généralisation récente des techniques de radiothérapie plus précises et mieux conformées comme la radiothérapie confor-mationnelle avec modulation d'intensité (RCMI) ou la radiothérapie stéréotaxique (SBRT), le rapport bénéfice/risque de la réirradiation a évolué ces dernières années. L'objectif de cette revue est de faire le point sur les réirradiations des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures en termes de sélection de patients, et de techniques modernes de radiothérapie. © 2019 Société franç aise de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)

Chimioradiothérapie concomitante des cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures. Faut-il revoir les contraintes de dose dans les organes à risque ?

International audienceConcurrent chemoradiotherapy improves the outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancers and the current reference chemotherapy is cisplatin. These results are obtained at the cost of increased toxicities. To limit the risk of toxicity, organ at riskdose constraints have been established starting with 2D radiotherapy, then 3D radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Regarding grade ≥3 acute toxicities, the scientific literature attests that concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly increases risks of mucositis and dysphagia. Constraints applied to the oral mucosa volume excluding the planning target volume, the pharyngeal constrictor muscles and the larynx limit this adverse impact. Regarding late toxicity, concurrent chemoradiotherapy increases significantly the risk of postoperative neck fibrosis and hearing loss. However, for some organs at risk, concurrent chemotherapy appears to increase late radiation induced effect, even though the results are less marked (brachial plexus, mandible, pharyngeal constrictor muscles, parotid gland). This additional adverse impact of concomitant chemotherapy may be notable only when organs at risk receive less than their usual dose thresholds and this would be vanished when those thresholds are exceeded as seems to be the situation for the parotid glands. Until the availability of more robust data, it seems appropriate to apply the principle of delivering dose to organs at risk as low as reasonably achievable

Double-blind randomized phase II results comparing concurrent high-dose cisplatin chemorradiation (CRT) plus debio 1143 or placebo in high-risk patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): A GORTEC study

44th Congress of the European-Society-for-Medical-Oncology (ESMO), Barcelona, SPAIN, SEP 27-OCT 01, 2019International audienc

Proposition de délinéation des volumes cibles anatomocliniques postopératoires de la tumeur primitive des cancers de l’ethmoïde [Proposal for the delineation of postoperative primary clinical target volumes in ethmoid cancers]

It is proposed to delineate the anatomo-clinical target volumes of primary tumor (CTV-P) in ethmoid cancers treated with post-operative radiotherapy. This concept is based on the use of radioanatomy and the natural history of cancer. It is supported by the repositioning of the planning scanner with preoperative imaging for the replacement of the initial GTV and the creation of margins around it extended to the microscopic risk zones according to the anatomical concept. This article does not discuss the indications of external radiotherapy but specifies the volumes to be delineated if radiotherapy is considered

Impact of neck dissection in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas of unknown primary

Purpose: Management of head and neck cancers of unknown primary (HNCUP) combines neck dissection (ND) and radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. The prognostic value of ND has hardly been studied in HNCUP. Methods: A retrospective multicentric study assessed the impact of ND extent (adenectomy, selective ND, radical/radical-modified ND) on nodal relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) or survival, taking into account nodal stage. Results: 53 patients (16.5%) had no ND, 33 (10.2%) had lymphadenectomy, 116 (36.0%) underwent selective ND and 120 underwent radical/radical-modified ND (37.3%), 15 of which received radical ND (4.7%). With a 34-month median follow-up, the 3-year incidence of nodal relapse was 12.5% and progression-free survival (PFS) 69.1%. In multivariate analysis after adjusting for nodal stage, the risk of nodal relapse or progression was reduced with lymphadenectomy, selective or radical/modified ND, but survival rates were similar. Patients undergoing lymphadenectomy or ND had a better PFS and lowered nodal relapse incidence in the N1 + N2a group, but the improvement was not significant for the N2b or N2 + N3c patients. Severe toxicity rates exceeded 40% with radical ND. Conclusion: In HNCUP, ND improves PFS, regardless of nodal stage. The magnitude of the benefit of ND does not appear to depend on ND extent and decreases with a more advanced nodal stage

Unilateral or bilateral irradiation in cervical lymph node metastases of unknown primary? A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cervical lymphadenopathy of unknown primary carcinoma (CUP) usually undergo neck dissection and irradiation. There is an ongoing controversy regarding the extent of nodal and mucosal volumes to be irradiated. We assessed outcomes after bilateral or unilateral nodal irradiation. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included patients with CUP and squamous cellular carcinoma who underwent radiotherapy (RT) between 2000 and 2015. RESULTS: Of 350 patients, 74.5% had unilateral disease and 25.5% had bilateral disease. Of 297 patients with available data on disease and irradiation sides, 61 (20.5%) patients had unilateral disease and unilateral irradiation, 155 (52.2%), unilateral disease and bilateral irradiation and 81 (27.3%), bilateral disease and bilateral irradiation. Thirty-four (9.7%) and 217 (62.0%) patients received neoadjuvant and/or concomitant chemotherapy, respectively. Median follow-up was 37 months. Three-year local, regional, locoregional failure rates and CUP-specific survival were 5.6%, 11.7%, 15.0% and 84.7%, respectively. In patients with unilateral disease, the 3-year cumulative incidence of regional/local relapse was 7.7%/4.3% after bilateral irradiation versus 16.9%/11.1% after unilateral irradiation (hazard ratio = 0.56/0.61, p = 0.17/0.32). The cumulative incidence of CUP-specific deaths was 9.2% after bilateral irradiation and 15.5% after unilateral irradiation (p = 0.92). In multivariate analysis, mucosal irradiation was associated with better local control, whereas no neck dissection, 65N2b and interruption of RT for more than 4 days were associated with poorer regional control. Toxicity was higher after bilateral irradiation (p < 0.05). No positron-emission tomography-computed tomography, largest node diameter, 65N2b, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interruption of RT were associated with poorer cause-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Bilateral nodal irradiation yielded non-significant better nodal and mucosal control rates but was associated with higher rates of severe toxicity

Debio 1143 and high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy in high-risk locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 study.

Debio 1143 is an orally available antagonist of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins with the potential to enhance the antitumour activity of cisplatin and radiotherapy. The radiosensitising effect of Debio 1143 is mediated through caspase activation and TNF, IFNγ, CD8 T cell-dependent pathways. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Debio 1143 in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 study by the French Head and Neck Radiotherapy Oncology Group (GORTEC) was run at 19 hospitals in France and Switzerland. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with locoregionally advanced, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (characterised as non-metastatic, measurable stage III, IVa, or IVb [limited to T ≥2, N0-3, and M0] disease), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, a history of heavy tobacco smoking (&gt;10 pack-years) with no previous or current treatment for invasive head and neck cancer, and no previous treatment with inhibitor of apoptosis protein antagonists. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral Debio 1143 (200 mg per day on days 1-14 of 21-day cycles, for three cycles) or oral placebo (20 mg/mL, administered at the same dosing schedule) using a stochastic minimisation technique according to node involvement and primary tumour site, and HPV-16 status in patients with an oropharyngeal primary tumour site. All patients received standard high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with locoregional control 18 months after chemoradiotherapy, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (primary analysis), and repeated in the per-protocol population. Responses were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02022098, and is still active but not recruiting. Between Jan 25, 2016, and April 24, 2017, 48 patients were randomly assigned to the Debio 1143 group and 48 to the placebo group (one patient in the placebo group did not receive the study drug and was not included in the safety analysis). Median duration of follow-up was 25·0 months (IQR 19·6-29·4) in the Debio 1143 group and 24·2 months (6·6-26·8) in the placebo group. Locoregional control 18 months after chemoradiotherapy was achieved in 26 (54%; 95% CI 39-69) of 48 patients in the Debio 1143 group versus 16 (33%; 20-48) of 48 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio 2·69 [95% CI 1·13-6·42], p=0·026). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 41 (85%) of 48 patients in the Debio 1143 group and in 41 (87%) of 47 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dysphagia (in 24 [50%] patients in the Debio 1143 group vs ten [21%] in the placebo group), mucositis (in 15 [31%] vs ten [21%]), and anaemia (in 17 [35%] vs 11 [23%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded in 30 (63%) of 48 patients in the Debio 1143 group and 28 (60%) of 47 in the placebo group. In the placebo group, two (4%) deaths were due to adverse events (one multiple organ failure and one asphyxia; neither was considered to be related to treatment). No deaths due to adverse events occurred in the Debio 1143 group. To our knowledge, this is the first treatment regimen to achieve superior efficacy in this disease setting against a high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy comparator in a randomised trial. These findings suggest that inhibition of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins is a novel and promising approach in this poor prognostic population and warrant confirmation in a phase 3 study with the aim of expanding the therapeutic options for these patients. Debiopharm