Safety and in vivo immune assessment of escalating doses of oral laquinimod in patients with RRMS

Abstract Background Laquinimod is an oral immunomodulator in clinical development to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Laquinimod is in clinical development for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and Huntington Disease (HD). The objective of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and cytoimmunologic effects following escalating doses of laquinimod in patients with RRMS. Methods One hundred twelve patients were randomly assigned to laquinimod/placebo in a series of separate dose-escalating cohorts starting from a daily oral dose of 0.9 mg/1.2 mg escalating to 2.7 mg, in 0.3 mg increments. Results Twenty-eight patients received placebo and 84 received laquinimod ranging from 0.9 to 2.7 mg. No deaths occurred. One serious adverse event (SAE) of perichondritis was reported, which was unrelated to laquinimod (0.9 mg). There was no increased incidence of adverse events (AEs) with escalating doses. Laquinimod-treated patients showed more abnormal laboratory levels in liver enzymes, P-amylase, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen, but most shifts were clinically non-significant. The exposure of laquinimod was dose proportional and linear in the tested dose range. An immunological substudy showed significant dose-dependent decreases in 6-sulpho LacNAc + dendritic cell (slanDC) frequency following laquinimod compared to placebo. Conclusion Laquinimod doses up to 2.7 mg were safely administered to patients with RRMS. An in vivo effect of laquinimod on the innate immune system was demonstrated. Trial registration EudraCT Number: 2009-011234-99 . Registered 23 June 2009

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF CARBAMAZEPINE AND VALPROIC ACID ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND METABOLIC PROFILE OF TOPIRAMATE AT STEADY STATE IN PATIENTS WITH EPILEPSY

PURPOSE: To compare the influence of enzyme-inducing comedication and valproic acid (VPA) on topiramate (TPM) pharmacokinetics and metabolism at steady state. METHODS: Three groups were assessed: (a) patients receiving TPM mostly alone (control group, n =13); (b) patients receiving TPM with carbamazepine (CBZ; n = 13); and (c) patients receiving TPM with VPA (n = 12). TPM and its metabolites were assayed in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in TPM oral (CL/F) and renal (CL(r)) clearance between the VPA group and the control group. Mean TPM CL/F and CL(r) were higher in the CBZ group than in controls (2.1 vs. 1.2 L/h and 1.1 vs. 0.6L/h, respectively; p 0.05). Urinary recovery of 2,3-O-des-isopropylidene-TPM (2,3-diol-TPM) accounted for 3.5% of the dose in controls, 2.2% in the VPA group (p > 0.05), and 13% in the CBZ group (p <0.05). The recovery of 10-hydroxy-TPM (10-OH-TPM) was twofold higher in the CBZ group than in controls, but it accounted for only <2% of the dose. The plasma concentrations of TPM metabolites were several fold lower than those of the parent drug. CONCLUSIONS: Renal excretion remains a major route of TPM elimination, even in the presence of enzyme induction. The twofold increase in TPM-CL/F in patients taking CBZ can be ascribed, at least in part, to stimulation of the oxidative pathways leading to formation of 2,3-diol-TPM and 10-OH-TPM. VPA was not found to have any clinically significant influence on TPM pharmacokinetic and metabolic profiles

A comparative study of the effect of carbamazepine and valproic acid on the pharmacokinetics and metabolic profile of topiramate at steady state in patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE: To compare the influence of enzyme-inducing comedication and valproic acid (VPA) on topiramate (TPM) pharmacokinetics and metabolism at steady state. METHODS: Three groups were assessed: (a) patients receiving TPM mostly alone (control group, n =13); (b) patients receiving TPM with carbamazepine (CBZ; n = 13); and (c) patients receiving TPM with VPA (n = 12). TPM and its metabolites were assayed in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in TPM oral (CL/F) and renal (CL(r)) clearance between the VPA group and the control group. Mean TPM CL/F and CL(r) were higher in the CBZ group than in controls (2.1 vs. 1.2 L/h and 1.1 vs. 0.6L/h, respectively; p < 0.05). In all groups, the urinary recovery of unchanged TPM was extensive and accounted for 42-52% of the dose (p > 0.05). Urinary recovery of 2,3-O-des-isopropylidene-TPM (2,3-diol-TPM) accounted for 3.5% of the dose in controls, 2.2% in the VPA group (p > 0.05), and 13% in the CBZ group (p < 0.05). The recovery of 10-hydroxy-TPM (10-OH-TPM) was twofold higher in the CBZ group than in controls, but it accounted for only <2% of the dose. The plasma concentrations of TPM metabolites were severalfold lower than those of the parent drug. CONCLUSIONS: Renal excretion remains a major route of TPM elimination, even in the presence of enzyme induction. The twofold increase in TPM-CL/F in patients taking CBZ can be ascribed, at least in part, to stimulation of the oxidative pathways leading to formation of 2,3-diol-TPM and 10-OH-TPM. VPA was not found to have any clinically significant influence on TPM pharmacokinetic and metabolic profiles

Additional file 1: Figure S1. of Safety and in vivo immune assessment of escalating doses of oral laquinimod in patients with RRMS

Study MS-LAQ-101 flow chart. Figure S2. Average plasma concentrations of laquinimod on Day 21 after repeated daily administration. Figure S3. Exposure-dose plots of laquinimod after multiple dose administration. Table S1. Distribution of study drug termination reasons. Table S2. Biochemistry shift analysis to abnormal levels. Table S3. Hematology shift analysis. (DOCX 276 kb