Modern mapping and ablation of idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

Outflow tract (OT) premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are being recognized as a common and often troubling, clinical electrocardiographic finding. The OT areas consist of the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract (RVOT), the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT), the Aortomitral Continuity (AMC), the aortic cusps and the Left Ventricular (LV) summit. By definition, all OT PVCs will exhibit an inferior QRS axis, defined as positive net forces in leads II, III and aVF. Activation mapping using the contemporary 3D mapping systems followed by pace mapping is the cornerstone strategy of every ablation procedure in these patients. In this mini review we discuss in brief all the modern mapping and ablation modalities for successful elimination of OT PVCs, along with the potential advantages and disadvantages of each ablation technique

Predictors of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse: A meta-analysis

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) has an estimated prevalence of 2-3% in the general population. Patients with MVP have an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmic events. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify easily obtained markers that can be used for the arrhythmic risk stratification of MVP patients. This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA Statement). The search strategy identified 23 studies that were finally included in the study. The quantitative synthesis showed that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) [RR 6.40 (2.11-19.39), I2 77%, P = 0.001], longer QTc interval [mean difference: 14.2 (8.92-19.49) I2 0%, P < 0.001], T-wave inversion in inferior leads [RR 1.60 (1.39-1.86), I2 0%, P < 0.001], mitral annular disjunction (MAD) [RR 1.77 (1.29-2.44), I2 37%, P = 0.0005], lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [mean difference: -0.77 (-1.48, -0.07) I2 0%, P = 0.03], bileaflet MVP [RR 1.32 (1.16-1.49), I2 0%, P < 0.001], increased anterior [mean difference: 0.45 (0.28, 0.61), I2 0%, P < 0.001] and posterior [mean difference: 0.39 (0.26, 0.52), I2 0%, P < 0.001] mitral leaflet thickness were significantly associated with ventricular arrhythmias in MVP patients. On the other hand, gender, QRS duration, anterior, and posterior mitral leaflet length were not associated with increased risk of arrhythmias. In conclusion, inferior T-wave inversions, QTc interval, LGE, LVEF, MAD, bileaflet MVP, anterior, and posterior mitral leaflet thickness are easily obtained markers that can be used for the risk stratification of patients with MVP. Prospective studies should be designed for the better stratification of this population. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Predictors of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with Mitral valve prolapse: A meta-analysis.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) has an estimated prevalence of 2-3% in the general population. Patients with MVP have an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmic events. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify easily obtained markers that can be used for the arrhythmic risk stratification of MVP patients. This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA Statement). The search strategy identified 23 studies that were finally included in the study. The quantitative synthesis showed that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) [RR 6.40 (2.11-19.39), I2 77%, P = 0.001], longer QTc interval [mean difference: 14.2 (8.92-19.49) I2 0%, P < 0.001], T-wave inversion in inferior leads [RR 1.60 (1.39-1.86), I2 0%, P < 0.001], mitral annular disjunction (MAD) [RR 1.77 (1.29-2.44), I2 37%, P = 0.0005], lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [mean difference: -0.77 (-1.48, -0.07) I2 0%, P = 0.03], bileaflet MVP [RR 1.32 (1.16-1.49), I2 0%, P < 0.001], increased anterior [mean difference: 0.45 (0.28, 0.61), I2 0%, P < 0.001] and posterior [mean difference: 0.39 (0.26, 0.52), I2 0%, P < 0.001] mitral leaflet thickness were significantly associated with ventricular arrhythmias in MVP patients. On the other hand, gender, QRS duration, anterior, and posterior mitral leaflet length were not associated with increased risk of arrhythmias. In conclusion, inferior T-wave inversions, QTc interval, LGE, LVEF, MAD, bileaflet MVP, anterior, and posterior mitral leaflet thickness are easily obtained markers that can be used for the risk stratification of patients with MVP. Prospective studies should be designed for the better stratification of this population. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

The RV1-V3 transition ratio: A novel electrocardiographic criterion for the differentiation of right versus left outflow tract premature ventricular complexes

Background: Several electrocardiographic (ECG) indices have been proposed to predict the origin of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) with precordial transition in lead V3. However, the accuracy of these algorithms is limited. Objectives: We sought to evaluate a new ECG criterion differentiating the origin of outflow tract with precordial transition in lead V3. Methods: We included in our study patients exhibiting outflow tract PVCs with precordial transition in lead V3 referred for ablation. We analyzed a novel new ECG criterion, RV1-V3 transition ratio, for distinguishing right from left idiopathic outflow tract PVCs with precordial transition in lead V3. The RV1-V3 transition ratio was defined as (RV1+RV2+RV3) PVC / (RV1+RV2+RV3) SR (sinus rhythm). Results: We included 58 patients in our study. The ratio was lower for right ventricular outflow tract origins than left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) origins (median [interquartile range], 0.6953 [0.4818–1.0724] vs 1.5219 [1.1582–2.4313], P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.856 for the ratio, and a cut-off value of ≥0.9 predicting LVOT origin with 94% sensitivity and 73% specificity. This ratio was superior to any previously proposed ECG criterion for differentiating right from left outflow tract PVCs. Conclusion: The RV1-V3 transition ratio is a simple and accurate novel ECG criterion for distinguishing right from left idiopathic outflow tract PVCs with precordial transition in lead V3.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Right ventricular outflow tract electroanatomical abnormalities in asymptomatic and high-risk symptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome: Evidence for a new risk stratification tool?

Introduction: Microstructural abnormalities at the epicardium of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) may provide the arrhythmia substrate in Brugada syndrome (BrS). Endocardial unipolar electroanatomical mapping allows the identification of epicardial abnormalities. We evaluated the clinical implications of an abnormal endocardial substrate as perceived by high-density electroanatomical mapping (HDEAM) in patients with BrS. Methods: Fourteen high-risk BrS patients with aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) (12 males, mean age: 41.9 ± 11.8 years) underwent combined endocardial-epicardial HDEAM of the right ventricle/RVOT, while 40 asymptomatic patients (33 males, mean age: 42 ± 10.7 years) underwent endocardial HDEAM. Based on combined endocardial-epicardial procedures, endocardial HDEAM was considered abnormal in the presence of low voltage areas (LVAs) more than 1 cm2 with bipolar signals less than 1 mV and unipolar signals less than 5.3 mV. Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) was performed in all patients. Results: The endocardial unipolar LVAs were colocalized with epicardial bipolar LVAs (p = .0027). Patients with aborted SCD exhibited significantly wider endocardial unipolar (p < .01) and bipolar LVAs (p < .01) compared with asymptomatic individuals. A substrate size of unipolar LVAs more than 14.5 cm2 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.92, p < .001] and bipolar LVAs more than 3.68 cm2 (AUC: 0.82, p = .001) distinguished symptomatic from asymptomatic patients. Patients with ventricular fibrillation inducibility (23/54) demonstrated broader endocardial unipolar (p < .001) and bipolar LVAs (p < .001) than noninducible patients. The presence of unipolar LVAs more than 13.5 cm2 (AUC: 0.95, p < .001) and bipolar LVAs more than 2.97 cm2 (AUC: 0.78, p < .001) predicted a positive PVS. Conclusion: Extensive endocardial electroanatomical abnormalities identify high-risk patients with BrS. Endocardial HDEAM may allow risk stratification of asymptomatic patients referred for PVS