Preliminary evidence on the safety profile of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty): new insights from data analysis in EudraVigilance and adverse reaction reports from an Italian health facility

The first vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 made available in Italy has been BNT162b2, the two-dose mRNA-based vaccine developed by Pfizer-BioNTech. The ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco hospital is located in one of the areas most affected by the pandemic, and to date over 2000 healthcare professionals have been injected with both vaccine doses. We have collected all spontaneous safety reports in which BNT162b2 was designated as the possible cause. We also have carried out a descriptive analysis of reports submitted in EudraVigilance in the same time-frame and compared our findings with those observed in clinical trials. We have identified several new and unexpected adverse reactions that will be helpful for reviewing the safety profile defined in the Summary of Product Characteristics for this vaccine

A randomized comparison of bypassing agents in hemophilia complicated by an inhibitor : the FEIBA NovoSeven Comparative (FENOC) Study

The development of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII is a serious complication of hemophilia. FEIBA (factor VIII inhibitor-bypassing activity), an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), and NovoSeven, recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), are used as hemostatic bypassing agents in treating patients with inhibitors. The FENOC study was designed to test equivalence of the products in the treatment of ankle, knee, and elbow joint bleeding. A prospective, open-label, randomized, crossover, equivalency design was used. The parameters of interest were the percentage of patients who reported efficacy in response to FEIBA and the percentage that reported efficacy in response to NovoSeven. A difference in these percentages of no more than 15% was determined to be a clinically acceptable magnitude for equivalence of the 2 products. The primary outcome was evaluation 6 hours after treatment. Data for 96 bleeding episodes contributed by 48 participants were analyzed. The criterion for declaring the 2 products equivalent at 6 hours was not met; however, the confidence interval of the difference in percentages of efficacy reported for each product only slightly exceeded the 15% boundary (-11.4%-15.7%), P = .059. FEIBA and NovoSeven appear to exhibit a similar effect on joint bleeds, although the efficacy between products is rated differently by a substantial proportion of patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00166309

Thoracoscopic Ablation of Critically Located Liver Tumors: A Safety and Efficacy Cohort Study

Background: Liver resection represents the first curative treatment to treat primary and secondary hepatic tumors. Thoracoscopic liver ablation is a viable and minimally invasive alternative treatment, especially for patients with previous multiple abdominal surgeries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic ablation for liver tumors.Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients with liver tumors, treated with thoracoscopic trans-diagrammatic ablation (MWA or RFA) at our institution from 2012 to 2018. The primary endpoint was post-operative mortality at 30 days, while secondary endpoints were morbidity and efficacy of ablation (i.e., response rate evaluated according to mRECIST criteria, and overall patient survival). Patient demographics, operational characteristics, and complications were recorded.Results: A total of 13 nodules were treated in 10 patients with a median age of 65.5 years. Post-operative mortality was 0%, and overall morbidity was 40% (Clavien-Dindo I complications 30%, II 0%, III 10%, IV 0%). Complete radiological response was obtained in 83.3% of nodules at 3 months. After a median follow-up of 20.95 months, the local tumor progression rate was 30%, with an intra-segmental-recurrence of 30%, and an intra-hepatic-recurrence of 30%. The overall 1-, 2-, and 3-years survival rates were 80%, 58%, and 58%.Conclusion: Thoracoscopic trans-diaphragmatic ablation proved to be a safe and effective way to treat liver tumors when abdominal approach is not feasible. Considering the low morbidity, it is a viable option to treat patients with recurrent disease and/or previous multiple abdominal surgeries

Long-term results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: anupdate of the University of Padova experience.

Abstract: Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) competes with benign liver disease as indication for liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to determine long-term results of OLT for HCC. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic role of HCC diagnosis at pathological exam in adult OLT. In the HCC group, we evaluated the prognostic role of the time of diagnosis (incidental versus nonincidental) and of pathological tumor TNM staging. The primary endpoint was 1-, 3-, and 10-year patient survivals. Results. From 1991 to 2006, among 550 adults who underwent first OLT, HCC was found in 120 patients at pathological exam. In 26 cases (22%), the diagnosis of HCC was incidental. There were 59 cases (49%) of pathological T1 to T2 tumor (one nodule < 5 cm, or two to three nodules < 3 cm, without metastases and/or vascular invasion), and 61 cases (51%) of pathologic T3-T4a tumor. HCC diagnosis did not show a significant prognostic impact by Cox survival analysis. After a median follow-up of 31 months, 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals were 91%, 81%, and 73% in the HCC group, and 84%, 76%, and 67% in the non-HCC group. Time of HCC diagnosis (incidental versus nonincidental) and pathological TNM staging (T1 to T2 vs T3 to T4a) did not result significant survival predictors upon Cox analysis. Conclusion. In our experience, the long-term results of OLT for HCC overlapped those of OLT for benign disease, although 51% of tumors were T3 to T4a at pathological exam