Is Herpes Simplex virus (HSV) a sign of Encephalitis in Iranian Newborns? Prevalence of HSV Infection in Pregnant Women in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

How to Cite This Article: Arabsalmani M, Behzadifar M, Baradaran HR, Toghae M, Beyranvand Gh, Olyaeemanesh A, Behzadifar M. Is Herpes Simplex virus (HSV) a sign of Encephalitis in Iranian Newborns? Prevalence of HSV Infection in Pregnant Women in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Child Neurol.Spring 2017; 11(2):1-7. AbstractObjectiveHerpes Simplex virus (HSV) is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases in the world. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of herpes simplex virus in pregnant women in Iran.Materials & MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted to study the HSV subtypes in Persian and English papers through several databases. We searched Pub Med, Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct and national databases as Magiran, Iranmedex and Science Information Database (SID) up to October 2015. Random-effects model were applied to calculate the pooled prevalence of HSV subtypes.ResultsFive eligible studies were identified, including 1140 participants. The pooled prevalence of HSV infection in pregnant women was 0.64% (95% CI: 0.10- 1.18) in Iran. The pooled prevalence of studies on both HSV-1 and HSV-2 was 0.91% (CI: 0.81-1.02) and studies on only HSV-2 was 0.23% (CI: -0.61-0.63), respectively.ConclusionThe prevalence of HSV infection in pregnant women in Iran was higher. HSV infection of the central nervous system, especially with HSV-2, can also cause recurrent aseptic meningitis and monophasic, as well as radiuculitis or myelitis. The performance of screening to detect infection in pregnant women can play an important role in the prevention and treatment of patients and help to prevent the transmission of HSV infection to infants in Iran.References 1.Xu F, Sternberg MR, Kottiri BJ, McQuillan GM, Lee FK, Nahmias AJ, et al. Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in the United States. JAMA Neurol 2006; 296:964-73.2.Bochner AF, Madhivanan P, Niranjankumar B, Ravi K, Arun A, Krupp K, et al. The Epidemiology of Herpes Simplex Virus Type-2 Infection among Pregnant Women in Rural Mysore Taluk, India. J Sex Transm Dis 2013; 2013:1-6.3.Kulhanjian JA, Soroush V, Au DS, Bronzan RN, Yasukawa LL, Weylman LE, et al. Identification of women at unsuspected risk of primary infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1992; 326 :916–20.4.Whitley RJ, Corey L, Arvin A, Lakeman FD, Sumaya CV, Wright PF, et al. Changing presentation of herpes simplex virus infection in neonates. J Infect Dis 1988; 158:109–16.5.Cusini M, Ghislanzoni M. The importance of diagnosing genital herpes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 47:9-16.6.Cherpes TL, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, Lurie JG, Hillier SL. Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37:319-25.7.Gottlieb SL, Douglas JM, Schmid DS, Bolan G, Iatesta M, Malotte CK, et al. Seroprevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in five sexually transmitted–disease clinics. J Infect Dis 2002; 186:1381-9.8.Arvaja M, Lehtinen M, Koskela P, Lappalainen M, Paavonen J, Vesikari T. Serological evaluation of herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 infections in pregnancy. J Sex Transm Infect 1999;75:168-71.9.Brown ZA, Selke S, Zeh J, Kopelman J, Maslow A, Ashley RL, et al. The acquisition of herpes simplex virus during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:509-16.10.Anzivino E, Fioriti D, Mischitelli M, Bellizzi A, Barucca V, Chiarini F, et al. Herpes simplex virus infection in pregnancy and in neonate: status of art of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapy and prevention. Virol J 2009; 6: 68-74.11.Weiss H. Epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the developing world. Herpes 2004;11:24-35.12.Swetha G, Pinninti, David W, Kimberlin. Preventing HSV in the Newborn. Clin Perinatol 2014; 41:945–55.13.Sheffield JS, Hill JB, Hollier LM, Laibl VR, Roberts SW, Sanchez PJ. Valacyclovir prophylaxis to prevent recurrent herpes at delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:141-7.14.Watts DH, Brown ZA, Money D, Selke S, Huang ML, Sacks SL. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of acyclovir in late pregnancy for the reduction of herpes simplex virus shedding and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188:836-43.15.Bulletin AP. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 45:102- 13.16.Curtis N, Finn A, Pollard A. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infections: where are we now? Hot Topics in Infection and Immunity in Children VII. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2011. P.146.17.Allen UD, Robinson JL. Prevention and management of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections. Pediatr Child Health 2014;19:19-31.18.Bernstein DI, Bellamy AR, Hook EW, Levin MJ, Wald A, Ewell MG, et al. Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, and Antibody Response to Primary Infection With Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 in Young Women. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56:344-51.19.Whitley R, Arvin A, Prober C, Corey L, Burchett S, Plotkin S, et al. Predictors of morbidity and mortality in neonates with herpes simplex virus infections. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:450-4.20.Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:573–7.21.Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 5thed. London, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.P.420.22.Danesh Shahraki A, Moghim S, Akbari P. Evaluation of the Serum Level of Herpes Simplex Type 2 Antibody among Pregnant Women in Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Isfahan. J Red Med Sci 2010;15:243.23.Bagheri Josheghani S, Moniri R, Baghbani Taheri F, Sadat S, Heidarzadeh Z. The Prevalence of Serum antibodies in TORCH Infections during the First Trimester of Pregnancy in Kashan, Iran. Iran J Neonatol 2015; 6:8-12.24.Ghasemi FS, Rasti S, Piroozmand A, Fakhrie-Kashan Z, Mousavi GA. Relationship between the prevalence of antibodies against cytomegalo, rubella, and herpes simplex viruses in women with spontaneous abortion compared to normal delivery. J Feyz 2015;19:86-92.25.Pourmand D, Janbakhsh A, Hamzehi K, Dinarvand F, Ahmadi D. Seroepide Miological Study of Herpes Simplex Virus in Pregnant Women Referring to Health and Care Center in Kermanshah. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2008;11:462-9.26.Golalipour MJ, Khodabakhshi B, Ghaemi E. Possible role of TORCH agents in congenital malformations in Gorgan, northern Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 2009;15:330-6.27.Chen KT, Segu M, Lumey LH, Kuhn L, Carter RJ, Bulterys M, et al. Genital herpes simplex virus infection and perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:1341-8.28.Ali S, Khan FA, Mian AA, Afzal MS. Seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus and rubella virus among pregnant women in KPK province of Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries 2014;18:389-90.29.Hezarjaribi HZ, Fakhar M, Shokri A, Teshnizi SH, Sadough A, Taghavi M. Trichomonas vaginalis infection among Iranian general population of women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitol Res 2015;114:1291- 300.30.Sauerbrei A, Wutzler P. Herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus infections during pregnancy: current concepts of prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Part 1: herpes simplex virus infections. Med Microbiol Immunol 2007; 196:89–9431.Büchner S, Erni P, Garweg J, Gerber S, Kempf W, Lauper U, et al. Swiss recommendations for the management of genital herpes and herpes simplex virus infection of the neonate. Swiss Medi Wkly 2004; 134:205–21432.Meerbach A, Sauerbrei A, Meerbach W, Bittrich HJ, Wutzler P. Fatal outcome of herpes simplex virus type 1-induced necrotic hepatitis in a neonate. Med Microbiol Immunol 2006; 195:101–10533.Tyler KL. Herpes simplex virus infections of the central nervous system: encephalitis and meningitis, including Mollaret’s. Herpes 2004. ; 11:57A-64A34.Corey L, Whitley RJ, Stone EF, Mohan K. Difference between herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 neonatal encephalitis in neurological outcome. Lancet 1988; 1:1-435.Berger JR, Houff S. Neurological complications of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Arch Neurol 2008.; 65:596-60036.Gallo MF, Warner L, Macaluso M, Stone KM, Brill I, Fleenor ME. Risk factors for incident herpes simplex type 2 virus infection among women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:679–85.37.Riley LE. Herpes simplex virus. Semin Perinatal 1998; 22:284-92.38.Lankarani KB, Alavian SM, Peymani P. Health in the Islamic Republic of Iran, challenges and progresses. Med J Islamic Repub Iran 2013; 27:42.39.Hoaglin DC. Assessment of heterogeneity in meta-analyses. JAMA Neurol 2014; 312:2286-7

The impact of Covid-19 on harm reduction policies in Iran:an interrupted time series analysis

Background: The global emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2019 posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems, disrupting routine services and necessitating swift adaptations. Harm reduction programs, vital for addressing substance use-related health risks, faced unique challenges during the pandemic, impacting vulnerable populations. This study focuses on the repercussions of Covid-19 on harm reduction policies in Iran, specifically examining the distribution of condoms, syringes, and methadone to high-risk individuals attending Triangle Centers. Aim: The study aims to assess the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on harm reduction services in Iran and provide evidence-based insights for policy adjustments. Using Interrupted Time Series Analysis (ITSA), the research analyzes trends in the distribution of condoms, syringes, and methadone before and after the official declaration of the pandemic in February 2020. Method: ITSA, a valuable tool for evaluating program impacts, was employed to analyze data collected from Triangle Centers in Lorestan Province, Iran. Monthly records of harm reduction services (condoms, syringes, methadone) from January 2017 to February 2023 were extracted. The pre-intervention period spanned January 2017 to January 2020, with the post-intervention period extending from February 2020 to February 2023. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Newey-West technique, Combi-Huizinga autocorrelation test, and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, with a significance threshold set at P-value < 0.05. Results: Following the onset of Covid-19, the level change in condom distribution to high-risk individuals showed a significant decline, decreasing by 2,168.87 units per month (95% CI: -2,405.57 to -1,932.15). Methadone dispensation, crucial for opioid harm reduction, also witnessed a substantial level change, decreasing by 5,007.60 cc per month (95% CI: -6,251.75 to -3,763.45). Additionally, the provision of syringes decreased significantly, with a level change of -601.01 units per month (95% CI: -706.39 to -495.62). Conclusion: This study reveals significant disruptions in harm reduction services in Iran post-Covid-19, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Factors such as fear, stigma, resource reallocation, and logistical challenges contribute to the observed decreases. Policymakers must prioritize sustaining harm reduction services during pandemics, ensuring continuity for vulnerable populations. The findings underscore the importance of proactive policy development and preparedness to prevent delays and inequalities in accessing essential services for individuals with high-risk behaviors. Overall, integrating harm reduction into pandemic planning is crucial for a resilient and equitable health system

Unleashing the potential:the imperative of political support for health technology assessment in Iran

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is essential for evidence-based healthcare decision-making, yet its integration into Iran’s healthcare system faces political and logistical challenges. Despite HTA’s potential to improve resource allocation, limited awareness, data gaps, and competing priorities hinder its implementation. This commentary emphasizes the need for political support, advocating capacity-building, collaboration, and alignment with long-term health policies. Leveraging international partnerships and monitoring outcomes can enhance HTA’s role in improving healthcare in Iran and contributing to global health advancements

Iran's Health System Transformation Plan: A SWOT analysis

Background: Societies are characterized by evolving health needs, which become more challenging throughout time, to which health system should respond. As such, a constant monitoring and a periodic review and reformation of healthcare systems are of fundamental importance to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare services delivery, equity, and sustainable funding. The establishment of President Rouhani's government in Iran, on May 5, 2014, the settlement of the new Ministry of Health and Medical Education administration (MoHME) and the need for change in the provision of healthcare services has led to the "Health System Transformation Plan" (HSTP). The aim of the current investigation was to critically evaluate the health transformation plan in Iran. Methods: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis enables to identify and assess the strengths and weaknesses within an organization or program, as well as the threats and opportunities outside the given organization or program. To identify SWOT of the HSTP in Iran, all articles concerning this program published in scholarly databases as well as in the gray literature were systematically searched. Subsequently, all factors identified at the first round were thematically classified into four categories and for reaching consensus on this classification, the list of points and factors was sent to 40 experts - policy- and decisionmakers, professors and academicians, health department workers, health activists, journalists. Results: Thirty-four subjects expressed comments on classification. Incorporating their suggestions, the SWOT analysis of Iran's HSTP was revised, finalized and then performed. Conclusion: HSTP in Iran, like many of the initiatives that have been recently introduced and not fully implemented, have various challenges, difficulties and pitfalls that health policymakers need to pay attention to. Interacting with criticisms, taking into account public opinion and strengthening the plan can make the project more effective, and it can be anticipated that in the future, better conditions in the health sector will be achieved

Assessing Iran’s health system according to the COVID-19 strategic preparedness and response plan of the World Health Organization: health policy and historical implications

Background: The role of health systems in the management of disasters including natural hazards like outbreaks and pandemics, is crucial and vital. Healthcare systems which are unprepared to properly deal with crises are much more likely to expose their public health workers and health personnel to harm and will not be able to deliver healthcare provisions in critical situations. This can lead to a drammatic toll of deaths, even in developed countries. The possible occurrence of global crises has prompted the WHO to devise instruments, guidelines and tools to assess the capacity of countries to deal with disasters. Iran’s health system has been hit hardly by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we aimed to assess its preparedness and response to the outbreak. Methods: The present investigation was designed as a qualitative study. We utilized the “COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan” devised by WHO as a conceptual framework. Results: The dimension/pillars which scored the highest was national laboratories, followed by surveillance, rapid response teams and case investigations. Risk communication and community engagement was another pillar receiving a high score, followed by infection prevention and control and by country-level coordination, planning and monitoring. The pillar/dimensions receiving the lowest scores were operational support and logistics; case management; and points of entry. Discussion: The COVID-19 pandemic has represented an unprecedent event that has challenged healthcare systems and facilities worldwide, highlighting their weaknesses and the need for inter-sectoral cooperation and collaboration during the crisis. Analyzing these experiences and capitalizing on them, by strengthening them,will help countries to be more prepared to face opossible future crises

General health status in Iranian diabetic patients assessed by short-form-36 questionnaire : A systematic review and meta-analysis

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on outpatient visits for patients with cancer in Iran:an interrupted time series analysis

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, affecting routine medical services, including for cancer patients. This study investigates the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on outpatient visits for patients with cancer in Iran. Methods: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) on data collected from electronic medical records. The ITSA methodology was employed to analyze monthly outpatient visits for patients with cancer data from March 2017 to January 2023 in Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. Results: Following the announcement of Covid-19 in Iran, outpatient visits for patients with cancer decreased immediately and sharply, with a mean of 247.08 visits per month, which has a 95% confidence interval of [-297; -197]. Subsequent waves in June 2020, September 2020, April 2021, July 2021, and January 2022 further affected outpatient visits. However, the initiation of Covid-19 vaccination, particularly for cancer patients, marked a positive turning point, leading to an increase of 156.39 outpatient visits between January and February 2022. Conclusion: Our study provides critical insights into the dynamic relationship between the Covid-19 pandemic, patient behavior, and cancer care utilization. The observed decrease in outpatient visits underscores the multifaceted challenges faced by cancer patients during the pandemic, while the positive influence of vaccination signals a pathway towards recovery. The importance of vaccination is highlighted as a key factor in improving outpatient visit rates. As healthcare systems adapt to ongoing challenges, understanding the complex interplay between public health crises and patient behavior is crucial for shaping resilient and patient-centric healthcare systems

Analysis and evolution of health policies in Iran through policy triangle framework during the last thirty years: a systematic review of the historical period from 1994 to 2021

Background: Health policy analysis as a multi-disciplinary approach to public policy illustrates the need for interventions that highlight and address important policy issues, improve the policy formulation and implementation process and lead to better health outcomes. Various theories and frameworks have been contributed as the foundation for the analysis of policy in various studies. This study aimed to analyze health policies during the historical period of the almost last 30 years in Iran using policy triangle framework. Method: To conduct the systematic review international databases (PubMed / Medline, Scopus, Web of Sciences, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, The Cochran Library) and Iranian databases from January 1994 to January 2021 using relevant keywords. A thematic qualitative analysis approach was used for the synthesis and analysis of data. Results: Out of 731 articles, 25 articles were selected and analyzed. Studies used health policy triangle framework to analyze policies in the Iranian health sector has been published since 2014. All the included studies were retrospective. The main focus of most of studies for the analysis was on the context and process of polices as the elements of the policy triangle. Conclusion: The main focus of health policy analysis studies in Iran over the last thirty years was on the context and process of polices. Although range of actors within and outside the Iran government influence health policies but in many policy processes the power and the role of all actors or players involved in the policy are not recognized carefully. Also, Iran's health sector suffers from lack of a proper framework for evaluating various implemented policies

Navigating barriers to health technology assessment development in Iran: A qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives

Background: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) plays a crucial role in informing healthcare policy and decision-making, especially in low- and middle-income countries like Iran. Despite its potential, the development of HTA in Iran faces significant barriers due to political, financial, technical, and social challenges. This study aims to explore stakeholder perspectives on the barriers hindering HTA development in Iran and to identify strategies for overcoming these obstacles. Methods: This qualitative study utilized semi-structured interviews to collect data from 18 stakeholders involved in the healthcare sector in Iran, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, and experts in health economics and policy. Thematic analysis was applied to identify key barriers and overarching themes related to HTA development. Results: Seven overarching themes emerged: [1] lack of a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework [2], financial constraints and limited funding [3], shortage of trained professionals and organizational resistance [4], low public and professional awareness [5], weak technical infrastructure and data systems [6], poor inter-organizational collaboration, and [7] political interference in health decision-making. These barriers hinder the effective integration of HTA into Iran’s healthcare system. Despite these barriers, participants suggested actionable recommendations, including strengthening governance structures, increasing financial investment, enhancing stakeholder engagement, and improving technical capacity. Conclusion: This study highlights the unique misalignment between HTA priorities and national health policies in Iran, barriers less frequently reported in other LMICs. Addressing these barriers through targeted policy reforms, investment in human resources, and enhanced collaboration could facilitate HTA development and improve healthcare decision-making in Iran

Exploring the landscape of health technology assessment in Iran: Perspectives from stakeholders on needs, demand and supply

Background: The evaluation of health technologies plays a crucial role in the allocation of resources and the promotion of equitable healthcare access, known as health technology assessment (HTA). This study focuses on Iran’s efforts to integrate HTA and aims to gain insights into stakeholder perspectives regarding capacity needs, demand and implementation. Methods: In this study, we employed the HTA introduction status analysis questionnaire developed by the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI), which has been utilized in various countries. The questionnaire consisted of 12 questions divided into three sections: HTA need, demand and supply. To identify key informants, we conducted a literature review and consulted with the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME), as well we experts in policy-making, health service provision and HTA. We selected stakeholders who held decision-making positions in the healthcare domain. A modified Persian version of the questionnaire was administered online from September 2022 to January 2023 and was pretested for clarity. The analysis of the collected data involved quantitative methods for descriptive analysis and qualitative methods for thematic analysis. Results: In this study, a total of 103 questionnaires were distributed, resulting in a favourable response rate of 61% from 63 participants, of whom 68% identified as male. The participants, when assessing the needs of HTA, rated allocative efficiency as the highest priority, with a mean rating of 8.53, thereby highlighting its crucial role in optimizing resource allocation. Furthermore, healthcare quality, with a mean rating of 8.17, and transparent decision-making, with a mean rating of 7.92, were highly valued for their impact on treatment outcomes and accountability. The importance of budget control (mean rating 7.58) and equity (mean rating 7.25) were also acknowledged, as they contribute to maintaining sustainability and promoting social justice. In terms of HTA demand, safety concerns were identified as the top priority, closely followed by effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, with an expanded perspective on the economy. However, limited access to local data was reported, which arose from various factors including data collection practices, system fragmentation and privacy concerns. The priorities of HTA users encompassed coverage, payment reform, benefits design, guidelines, service delivery and technology registration. Evidence generation involved the participation of medical universities, research centres and government bodies, albeit with ongoing challenges in research quality, data access and funding. The study highlights government support and medical education as notable strengths in this context. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of Iran’s HTA landscape, considering its capacity, demand and implementation aspects. It underlines the vital role of HTA in optimizing resources, improving healthcare quality and promoting equity. The study also sheds light on the strengths of evidence generation in the country, while simultaneously identifying challenges related to data access and system fragmentation. In terms of policy priorities, evidence-based decision-making emerges as crucial for enhancing healthcare access and integrating technology. The study stresses the need for evidence-based practices, a robust HTA infrastructure and collaboration among stakeholders to achieve better healthcare outcomes in Iran