21 research outputs found

    A comparison of psoriasis severity in pediatric patients treated with methotrexate vs biologic agents

    Get PDF
    This cohort study compares the use of methotrexate vs biologic agents in children with moderate to severe psoriasis. Question What is the association between use of methotrexate vs biologics and psoriasis severity and drug survival (rate and duration of adherence to a specific drug regimen) in pediatric patients with moderate to severe psoriasis? Findings In this cohort study including 234 pediatric patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, those receiving biologics were more likely than those treated with methotrexate to achieve a Physician Global Assessment status of clear/almost clear and 75% or more improvement of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index rating at 6 months. In addition, biologics were associated with better drug survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years, with comparable discontinuation rates owing to lack of response. Meaning In pediatric patients with psoriasis, treatment with biologics may be associated with a significantly greater reduction in psoriasis severity than methotrexate; nevertheless, with 35.6% of the patients achieving clear/almost clear and 40.0% reaching 75% or more improvement on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, methotrexate remains an effective treatment for pediatric psoriasis. Importance Few studies have compared the use of methotrexate and biologics, the most commonly used systemic medications for treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in children. Objective To assess the real-world, 6-month reduction in psoriasis severity and long-term drug survival (rate and duration of adherence to a specific drug) of methotrexate vs biologics in plaque psoriasis in children. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective medical records review was conducted at 20 European and North American centers. Treatment response was based on site-reported Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and/or Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores at baseline and within the first 6 months of treatment. Participants included all 234 consecutively seen children with moderate to severe psoriasis who received at least 3 months of methotrexate or biologics from December 1, 1990, to September 16, 2014, with sufficient data for analysis. Data analysis was performed from December 14, 2015, to September 1, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures PASI, with a range from 0 to 72 (highest score indicating severe psoriasis), and/or PGA, with a scale of 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (very severe). Results Of 234 pediatric patients (103 boys [44.0%]; 131 girls [56.0%]) treated with methotrexate and/or biologics, 163 patients (69.7%) exclusively received methotrexate, 47 patients (20.1%) exclusively received biologics, and 24 children (10.2%) received methotrexate and biologics sequentially. Of the latter cohort, 23 children were treated initially with methotrexate. Mean (SD) age at initiation was 11.6 (3.7) years for methotrexate and 13.3 (2.9) years for biologics (73.2% for etanercept) (P = .002). Among patients evaluated by a scoring method at 6-month follow-up, 75% or greater improvement in PASI (PASI75) was achieved in 12 of 30 patients (40.0%) receiving methotrexate and 20 of 28 patients (71.4%) receiving biologics, and PGA was clear/almost clear (PGA 0/1) in 41 of 115 patients (35.6%) receiving methotrexate and 18 of 37 patients (48.6%) receiving biologics. Achieving PASI75 and/or PGA 0/1 between baseline and 6 months was more likely with biologics than methotrexate (PASI75: odds ratio [OR], 4.56; 95% CI, 2.02-10.27; P < .001; and PGA 0/1: OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.98-4.00; P = .06). Decreased mean PASI and PGA scores were associated with biologics more than with methotrexate (PASI effect, -3.13; 95% CI, -4.33 to -1.94; P < .001; and PGA effect, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.06; P = .02). After 1, 3, and 5 years of use, overall drug survival rates for methotrexate were 77.5%, 50.3%, and 35.9%, and for biologics, the rates were 83.4%, 64.3%, and 57.1%, respectively. Biologics were associated with a better confounder-corrected drug survival than methotrexate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23; 95% CI, 1.21-4.10; P = .01). Discontinuation owing to lack of response was comparable (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.80-3.36; P = .18). Conclusions and Relevance Methotrexate and biologics appear to be associated with improvement in pediatric psoriasis, although biologics seem to be associated with greater reduction in psoriasis severity scores and higher drug survival rates than methotrexate in the real-world setting. Additional studies directly comparing these medications should be performed for confirmation

    Management of infantile hemangiomas during the COVID pandemic

    Get PDF
    This article is made available for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused significant shifts in patient care including a steep decline in ambulatory visits and a marked increase in the use of telemedicine. Infantile hemangiomas (IH) can require urgent evaluation and risk stratification to determine which infants need treatment and which can be managed with continued observation. For those requiring treatment, prompt initiation decreases morbidity and improves long‐term outcomes. The Hemangioma Investigator Group has created consensus recommendations for management of IH via telemedicine. FDA/EMA‐approved monitoring guidelines, clinical practice guidelines, and relevant, up‐to‐date publications regarding initiation and monitoring of beta‐blocker therapy were used to inform the recommendations. Clinical decision‐making guidelines about when telehealth is an appropriate alternative to in‐office visits, including medication initiation, dosage changes, and ongoing evaluation, are included. The importance of communication with caregivers in the context of telemedicine is discussed, and online resources for both hemangioma education and propranolol therapy are provided

    Searches for IceCube Neutrinos Coincident with Gravitational Wave Events

    Get PDF

    An improved infrastructure for the IceCube realtime system

    Get PDF

    Teledermatology in practice: Report of Mayo Clinic experience

    No full text
    Background Delivery of dermatologic care through telemedicine was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to analyze the teledermatology experience across Mayo Clinic's health care system to identify strengths and limitations of teledermatology. Methods Electronic health records of dermatology televisits were reviewed from multiple U.S. Mayo Clinic sites from January 2020 through January 2021. Results A total of 13,181 dermatology televisits were conducted in 6468 unique patients. Patients were primarily female (60.2%), and mean age of all patients was 34.1 years. Synchronous / live video conferencing visits were the most common (40.0%) telecare modality. Synchronous / live audio conferencing and asynchronous / store-and-forward visits comprised 33.0% and 27.0% of appointments. In total, 3944 televisits (29.9%) were successfully concluded via a single appointment. An in-person appointment was needed for 1693 patients (26.2%) after their initial televisit. For patients with a single televisit, synchronous / live video conferencing was the most common virtual modality (58.0% vs 32.2% of patients with multiple visits, p  < 0.001). Patients needing in-person follow-up visits were slightly older than those who did not (mean [SD], 38.8 [22.3] vs 35.0 [23.6] years; p  < 0.001) but without any sex-based difference. Around one-third of patients needed an in-person follow-up visit after their initial asynchronous / store-and-forward visit which was higher when compared with synchronous / live audio and video conferencing. Conclusion Single dermatology televisits effectively managed nearly one-third of patients who did not require in-person follow-up. An initial synchronous / live video conferencing was more likely to yield a single clinical encounter, whereas asynchronous / store-and-forward visits required more in-person follow-up. Future studies are required that focus on dermatology-specific cost, diagnoses, access, quality of care, and outcomes

    Prospective Observational Study of Pain Severity and Pain Interference Outcomes Following Percutaneous MRI-guided Laser Ablation or Cryoablation for Focal Painful Peripheral, Soft Tissue Vascular Malformations: 12-month Outcomes

    No full text
    Background:. Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation has emerged as a treatment option for vascular malformations (VM). However, prospective data on intermediate to long-term effectiveness with uniform follow-up are lacking. Purpose:. To prospectively evaluate the 12-month pain severity and pain interference outcomes following percutaneous MRI-guided laser ablation and cryoablation of focal painful, peripheral soft tissue VM. Materials and Methods:. Participants undergoing clinically indicated MRI-guided laser ablation and cryoablation for focal painful (worst pain ≥4 out of 10 on Visual Analog Scale), peripheral soft tissue vascular malformations (VM) were enrolled in an IRB-approved prospective, observational study after giving informed consent. Participants completed the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire prior to ablation and 1, 3, 6, and 12-month postablation. Differences in pain severity and interference outcomes from baseline on a 0 to 10 scale were compared using a paired t-test. Results:. Seventeen participants (15 female; mean age 28.3 ± 9.3 years) underwent 24 MRI-guided and monitored ablation sessions including laser (n = 21), cryoablation (n = 2), or both (n = 1) for treatment of painful slow-flow (n = 16) or high-flow (n = 1) VM. Median maximal VM diameter was 5.7 cm (range 1.1 to 31.0 cm). Mean (±SD) preablation worst pain score was 7.9 ± 1.4. There was a significant decrease in worst pain at 1-month postablation (–3.5 ± 2.9; P = .0007) that was sustained at 3 (–3.4 ± 3.2; P = .0007), 6 (–4.2 ± 3.6; P = .0003), and 12 months (–3.6 ± 3.9; P = .002), with similar results for average, current, and least pain scores. There was a significant improvement in pain interference outcomes at 12-month postablation: general activity (P = .018), walking ability (P = .008), work (P = .003), sleep (P = .007), and enjoyment of life (P = .033). Conclusions:. These data suggest that MRI-guided and monitored thermal ablation is safe and provides early and sustained significant improvements in pain severity and pain interference outcomes during the first year of follow-up in participants with focal painful peripheral soft tissue VM

    Consensus Statement for the Management and Treatment of Port-Wine Birthmarks in Sturge-Weber Syndrome.

    No full text
    ImportanceSturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a neurocutaneous syndrome involving the skin, brain, and eyes. Consensus recommendations for management are lacking.ObjectiveTo consolidate the current literature with expert opinion to make recommendations that will guide treatment and referral for patients with port-wine birthmarks (PWBs).Evidence reviewIn this consensus statement, 12 nationally peer-recognized experts in dermatology with experience treating patients with SWS were assembled. Key topics and questions were formulated for each group and included risk stratification, optimum treatment strategies, and recommendations regarding light-based therapies. A systematic PubMed search was performed of English-language articles published between December 1, 2008, and December 1, 2018, as well as other pertinent studies identified by the expert panel. Clinical practice guidelines were recommended.FindingsTreatment of PWBs is indicated to minimize the psychosocial impact and diminish nodularity and potentially tissue hypertrophy. Better outcomes may be attained if treatments are started at an earlier age. In the US, pulsed dye laser is the standard for all PWBs regardless of the lesion size, location, or color. When performed by experienced physicians, laser treatment can be safe for patients of all ages. The choice of using general anesthesia in young patients is a complex decision that must be considered on a case-by-case basis.Conclusions and relevanceThese recommendations are intended to help guide clinical practice and decision-making for patients with SWS and those with isolated PWBs and may improve patient outcomes
    corecore