ETV7 reduces inflammatory responses in breast cancer cells by repressing the TNFR1/NF-κB axis

: The transcription factor ETV7 is an oncoprotein that is up-regulated in all breast cancer (BC) types. We have recently demonstrated that ETV7 promoted breast cancer progression by increasing cancer cell proliferation and stemness and was also involved in the development of chemo- and radio-resistance. However, the roles of ETV7 in breast cancer inflammation have yet to be studied. Gene ontology analysis previously performed on BC cells stably over-expressing ETV7 demonstrated that ETV7 was involved in the suppression of innate immune and inflammatory responses. To better decipher the involvement of ETV7 in these signaling pathways, in this study, we identified TNFRSF1A, encoding for the main receptor of TNF-α, TNFR1, as one of the genes down-regulated by ETV7. We demonstrated that ETV7 directly binds to the intron I of this gene, and we showed that the ETV7-mediated down-regulation of TNFRSF1A reduced the activation of NF-κB signaling. Furthermore, in this study, we unveiled a potential crosstalk between ETV7 and STAT3, another master regulator of inflammation. While it is known that STAT3 directly up-regulates the expression of TNFRSF1A, here we demonstrated that ETV7 reduces the ability of STAT3 to bind to the TNFRSF1A gene via a competitive mechanism, recruiting repressive chromatin remodelers, which results in the repression of its transcription. The inverse correlation between ETV7 and TNFRSF1A was confirmed also in different cohorts of BC patients. These results suggest that ETV7 can reduce the inflammatory responses in breast cancer through the down-regulation of TNFRSF1A

Sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using fibrin gel reduces ischemia time while preserving renal function

Objectives: We evaluated the efficacy of sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), using a fibrin gel in order to minimize renal ischemia time and preserve kidney function. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients (mean age 58.3 ± 7.1) undergoing sutureless LPN using a fbrin gel were compared with a control group consisting of 21 patients (mean age 57.9 ± 7.5) subjected to LPN with standard suturing. Intraand post-operative data for the two groups were compared. The following parameters were recorded: patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor characteristics according to the RENAL score, warm ischemia and operative times, estimated blood loss, mean hospital stay, post-operative complications referring to the Clavien-Dindo classification, renal function parameters pathologic and follow-up data. The main outcome measure was renal ischemia time and maintenance of kidney function. Results: Median warm ischemia time was 13 minutes (range 11-19) in the group treated with fibrin gel and 19 (range 17- 29) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The two groups were homogeneous in terms of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (4.6 vs 4.8) and RENAL score (9.6 vs 9.4). Median operative time differed significantly in the two groups, 183 minutes (range 145-218) in the group treated with fibrin gel and 201 (range 197-231) in the control group (p < 0.001). A negative surgical margin was reported in 18 patients (94.7%) in the group treated with fibrin gel and in 21 patients (100%) in the control group. No difference in renal function was found between the two groups. Conclusions: Sutureless LPN with fibrin gel can reduce warm ischemia and total operative time while preserving kidney function

On the origin and propagation of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Italian Province of Trento, a tourist region of Northern Italy

15openInternationalItalian coauthor/editorBackground: Trentino is an Italian province with a tourism-based economy, bordering the regions of Lombardy and Veneto, where the two earliest and largest outbreaks of COVID-19 occurred in Italy. The earliest cases in Trentino were reported in the first week of March 2020, with most of the cases occurring in the winter sport areas in the Dolomites mountain range. The number of reported cases decreased over the summer months and was followed by a second wave in the autumn and winter of 2020. Methods: we performed high-coverage Oxford Nanopore sequencing of 253 positive SARS-CoV-2 swabs collected in Trentino between March and December 2020. Results: in this work, we analyzed genome sequences to trace the routes through which the virus entered the area, and assessed whether the autumnal resurgence could be attributed to lineages persisting undetected during summer, or as a consequence of new introductions. Conclusions: Comparing the draft genomes analyzed with a large selection of European sequences retrieved from GISAID we found that multiple introductions of the virus occurred at the early stage of the epidemics; the two epidemic waves were unrelated; the second wave was due to reintroductions of the virus in summer when traveling restrictions were upliftedopenBianco, Luca; Moser, Mirko; Silverj, Andrea; Micheletti, Diego; Lorenzin, Giovanni; Collini, Lucia; Barbareschi, Mattia; Lanzafame, Paolo; Segata, Nicola; Pindo, Massimo; Franceschi, Pietro; Rota-Stabelli, Omar; Rizzoli, Annapaola; Fontana, Paolo; Donati, ClaudioBianco, L.; Moser, M.; Silverj, A.; Micheletti, D.; Lorenzin, G.; Collini, L.; Barbareschi, M.; Lanzafame, P.; Segata, N.; Pindo, M.; Franceschi, P.; Rota-Stabelli, O.; Rizzoli, A.; Fontana, P.; Donati, C

Biosafety in surgical pathology in the era of SARS-Cov2 pandemia. A statement of the Italian Society of Surgical Pathology and Cytology

Surgical pathology units face chemical and biological risks. While chemical risks have been intensely evaluated since the formalin ban, less attention has been drown to biological risks. The actual epidemiologic situation due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia has raised a series of questions, which need to be addressed as soon as possible. We have to pursue two lines of action: on one hand we must immediately adopt urgent measures to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection of laboratory personnel, and on the other hand, we must address crucial technical and organizational aspects of biological risk reduction, preserving as much as possible the quality of tissue and cell samples. The evaluation of biological risk is an analytical process which involves different steps: a) characterization of the hazard (also known as risk assessment) and b) definition of a risk reduction strategy (also known as risk mitigation) 1. Risk assessment implies a) the identification of the intrinsic biologic characteristics of the infectious agent, and b) the identification of the laboratory procedures related to the agent. The intrinsic biologic characteristics of infectious agents are classified in 4 risk groups (RG) by the laboratory biosafety manual of the WHO 2. The RG range from level 1 (RG1) which includes microorganisms that are unlikely to cause human or animal disease, to level 4 (RG4) which includes pathogens which cause serious diseases, that can be readily transmitted from one individual to another, and for which effective treatment and preventive measures are not usually available. Risk mitigation includes the definition of the appropriate a) level of biosafety of the laboratory, b) type of personal protection equipment (PPE), c) type of infrastructure and equipment, and d) education of involved personnel. Laboratory biosafety is graded in 4 levels (BSL-1 to BSL-4) as exhaustively described in the laboratory biosafety manual of the WHO 2, and these levels are usually also defined by law (in Italy by the D. Lgs. 81/2008). BSL are a series of protections, which include individual safeguards designed to protect laboratory personnel, as well as the surrounding environment and community. The biosafety level required in laboratories derives from the characterization of the risk, and is not automatically derived from the risk group to which the pathogenic agent belongs. It is obvious that the biosafety level for a laboratory which cultivates a RG3 agent, will be higher than the level needed for a laboratory which performs diagnostic tests on inactivated biomaterials on the same agent. Specific checklists, derived from the WHO laboratory biosafety manual, which in Italy are also defined by the National Institute of Labor Safety Insurance (Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro) in its 6th Fascicle published in 2010 3 are necessary to verify the compliance of a given laboratory with the required biosafety level

heterogeneity of large cell carcinoma of the lung an immunophenotypic and mirna based analysis

Large cell carcinomas (LCCs) of the lung are heterogeneous and may be of different cell lineages. We analyzed 56 surgically resected lung tumors classified as LCC on the basis of pure morphologic grounds, using a panel of immunophenotypic markers (adenocarcinoma [ADC]-specific, thyroid transcription factor-1, cytokeratin 7, and napsin A; squamous cell carcinoma [SQCC]–specific, p63, cytokeratin 5, desmocollin 3, and Δnp63) and the quantitative analysis of microRNA-205 (microRNA sample score [mRSS]). Based on immunoprofiles 19 (34%) of the cases were reclassified as ADC and 14 (25%) as SQCC; 23 (41%) of the cases were unclassifiable. Of these 23 cases, 18 were classified as ADC and 5 as SQCC according to the mRSS. Our data show that an extended panel of immunohistochemical markers can reclassify around 60% of LCCs as ADC or SQCC. However, a relevant percentage of LCCs may escape convincing immunohistochemical classification, and mRSS could be used for further typing, but its clinical relevance needs further confirmation. Large cell carcinoma (LCC) of the lung is 1 of 4 major histopathologic tumor subtypes recognized by current classifications of lung tumors. However, although squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC), adenocarcinoma (ADC), and small cell carcinoma are well-defined entities with typical morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features, LCCs, with the exception of the rare neuroendocrine, rhabdoid, basaloid, and lymphoepithelioma-like subtypes, are defined as poorly differentiated non–small cell tumors lacking features of ADC and SQCC. Therefore, the term LCC has frequently and improperly been used as a synonym of undifferentiated non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and has been used as a "wastebasket" for tumors lacking a definite morphologic pattern. Studies show that, by using ancillary techniques, a relevant percentage of LCCs could be reclassified as SQCC or ADC. Gene profiling shows that most LCCs have profiles quite similar to ADC or SQCC. 1-3 Similarly, by using appropriate immunohistochemical stains, almost two thirds of LCCs can be reclassified as poorly differentiated ADC or SQCC. 4,5 These studies have profound clinical relevance because rendering a diagnosis of LCC may represent a challenge for oncologists who need accurate subtyping of lung cancers to provide patients with optimal targeted chemotherapeutic agents, showing different efficacy with specific NSCLC categories (usually effective for ADC and not for others). 6,

ETS-related gene (ERG) undermines genome stability in mouse prostate progenitors via Gsk3β dependent Nkx3.1 degradation.

21q22.2-3 deletion is the most common copy number alteration in prostate cancer (PCa). The genomic rearrangement results in the androgen-dependent de novo expression of ETS-related gene (ERG) in prostate cancer cells, a condition promoting tumor progression to advanced stages of the disease. Interestingly, ERG expression characterizes 5-30% of tumor precursor lesions - High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) - where its role remains unclear. Here, by combining organoids technology with Click-chemistry coupled Mass Spectrometry, we demonstrate a prominent role of ERG in remodeling the protein secretome of prostate progenitors. Functionally, by lowering autocrine Wnt-4 signaling, ERG represses canonical Wnt pathway in prostate progenitors, and, in turn, promotes the accumulation of DNA double strand breaks via Gsk3β-dependent degradation of the tumor suppressor Nkx3.1. On the other hand, by shaping extracellular paracrine signals, ERG strengthens the pro-oxidative transcriptional signature of inflammatory macrophages, which we demonstrate to infiltrate pre-malignant ERG positive prostate lesions. These findings highlight previously unrecognized functions of ERG in undermining adult prostate progenitor niche through cell autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms. Overall, by supporting the survival and proliferation of prostate progenitors in the absence of growth stimuli and promoting the accumulation of DNA damage through destabilization of Nkx3.1, ERG could orchestrate the prelude to neoplastic transformation

Appendiceal collision tumors: case reports, management and literature review

Appendiceal tumors are incidentally detected in 0.5% cases of appendectomy for acute appendicitis and occur in approximately 1% of all appendectomies. Here, we report two cases of appendiceal collision tumors in two asymptomatic women. In both cases, imaging revealed right-lower-quadrant abdominal masses, which were laparoscopically resected. In both cases, histological examinations revealed an appendiceal collision tumor comprising a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). For complete oncological control, right hemicolectomy was performed in one patient for the aggressive behavior of NEN; however, histology revealed no metastasis. The other patient only underwent appendectomy. No further treatment was recommended. According to the latest guidelines, exact pathology needs to be defined. Proper management indicated by a multidisciplinary team is fundamental