9 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Single-Trial EEG Analysis Predicts Memory Retrieval and Reveals Source-Dependent Differences
We used pattern classifiers to extract features related to recognition memory retrieval from the temporal information in single-trial electroencephalography (EEG) data during attempted memory retrieval. Two-class classification was conducted on correctly remembered trials with accurate context (or source) judgments vs. correctly rejected trials. The average accuracy for datasets recorded in a single session was 61% while the average accuracy for datasets recorded in two separate sessions was 56%. To further understand the basis of the classifier’s performance, two other pattern classifiers were trained on different pairs of behavioral conditions. The first of these was designed to use information related to remembering the item and the second to use information related to remembering the contextual information (or source) about the item. Mollison and Curran (2012) had earlier shown that subjects’ familiarity judgments contributed to improved memory of spatial contextual information but not of extrinsic associated color information. These behavioral results were similarly reflected in the event-related potential (ERP) known as the FN400 (an early frontal effect relating to familiarity) which revealed differences between correct and incorrect context memories in the spatial but not color conditions. In our analyses we show that a classifier designed to distinguish between correct and incorrect context memories, more strongly involves early activity (400–500 ms) over the frontal channels for the location distinctions, than for the extrinsic color associations. In contrast, the classifier designed to classify memory for the item (without memory for the context), had more frontal channel involvement for the color associated experiments than for the spatial experiments. Taken together these results argue that location may be bound more tightly with the item than an extrinsic color association. The multivariate classification approach also showed that trial-by-trial variation in EEG corresponding to these ERP components were predictive of subjects’ behavioral responses. Additionally, the multivariate classification approach enabled analysis of error conditions that did not have sufficient trials for standard ERP analyses. These results suggested that false alarms were primarily attributable to item memory (as opposed to memory of associated context), as commonly predicted, but with little previous corroborating EEG evidence
Electrophysiological correlates of high-level perception during spatial navigation
We studied the electrophysiological basis of object recognition by recording scalp\ud
electroencephalograms while participants played a virtual-reality taxi driver game.\ud
Participants searched for passengers and stores during virtual navigation in simulated\ud
towns. We compared oscillatory brain activity in response to store views that were targets or\ud
nontargets (during store search) or neutral (during passenger search). Even though store\ud
category was solely defined by task context (rather than by sensory cues), frontal ...\ud
\u
Recommended from our members
Investigating Familiarity's Contribution to Source Recognition
In a dual-process framework, two processes are involved in successful recognition memory: recollection involves the retrieval of specific information from the study episode, and familiarity supports recognition without remembering additional episodic details. The differences between these processes have been examined using patterns of activity in the electroencephalogram (EEG) correlated with behavior. Event-related potentials (ERPs) dissociate these recognition memory processes, specifically with an early (approximately 300–500 ms) frontal effect relating to familiarity (the FN400) and a later parietal (500–800 ms) effect relating to recognition. It has been debated whether source information for a studied item (i.e., contextual associations from when the item was previously encountered) is only accessible through recollection, or whether familiarity can contribute to successful source recognition. Importantly, prior research has shown that while familiarity can assist in perceptual source monitoring when the source attribute is an intrinsic property of the item (e.g., an object's surface color), only one prior study has demonstrated its contribution to recognizing extrinsic (unrelated) source associations. Perceptual and conceptual source associations were examined in three experiments involving memory judgments for pictures of common objects. In Experiment 1, source information was arbitrary perceptual associations presented visually (screen side and frame color). Results were inconsistent with the idea that only recollection supports the recognition of correct source information: the FN400 ERP component was significantly different between trials that had correct and incorrect source judgments. Source information in Experiment 2 was defined according to the conceptual encoding task completed during the study lists (size and animacy judgments); the FN400 did not differ between correct and incorrect source monitoring. Experiment 3 combined the perceptual and conceptual source aspects of the first two experiments, and behavioral analyses support the results of the first two experiments. Overall, the results suggest that familiarity's contribution to source monitoring depends on the type of source information being remembered. The familiarity process is more likely to successfully contribute to source recognition when the attributes are perceptually defined than when they are conceptual, and familiarity can successfully monitor extrinsic sources
Recommended from our members
Single-Trial EEG Analysis Predicts Memory Retrieval and Reveals Source-Dependent Differences.
We used pattern classifiers to extract features related to recognition memory retrieval from the temporal information in single-trial electroencephalography (EEG) data during attempted memory retrieval. Two-class classification was conducted on correctly remembered trials with accurate context (or source) judgments vs. correctly rejected trials. The average accuracy for datasets recorded in a single session was 61% while the average accuracy for datasets recorded in two separate sessions was 56%. To further understand the basis of the classifier's performance, two other pattern classifiers were trained on different pairs of behavioral conditions. The first of these was designed to use information related to remembering the item and the second to use information related to remembering the contextual information (or source) about the item. Mollison and Curran (2012) had earlier shown that subjects' familiarity judgments contributed to improved memory of spatial contextual information but not of extrinsic associated color information. These behavioral results were similarly reflected in the event-related potential (ERP) known as the FN400 (an early frontal effect relating to familiarity) which revealed differences between correct and incorrect context memories in the spatial but not color conditions. In our analyses we show that a classifier designed to distinguish between correct and incorrect context memories, more strongly involves early activity (400-500 ms) over the frontal channels for the location distinctions, than for the extrinsic color associations. In contrast, the classifier designed to classify memory for the item (without memory for the context), had more frontal channel involvement for the color associated experiments than for the spatial experiments. Taken together these results argue that location may be bound more tightly with the item than an extrinsic color association. The multivariate classification approach also showed that trial-by-trial variation in EEG corresponding to these ERP components were predictive of subjects' behavioral responses. Additionally, the multivariate classification approach enabled analysis of error conditions that did not have sufficient trials for standard ERP analyses. These results suggested that false alarms were primarily attributable to item memory (as opposed to memory of associated context), as commonly predicted, but with little previous corroborating EEG evidence