Infección por SARS-CoV-2 : implicaciones para la salud sexual y reproductiva. Una declaración de posición de la Asociación Española de Andrología, Medicina Sexual y Reproductiva (ASESA)

El objetivo de esta revisión es resumir la evidencia disponible sobre los posibles efectos adversos del SARS-CoV-2 en el sistema reproductor masculino y proporcionar una declaración de posición oficial de la Asociación Española de Andrología, Medicina Sexual y Reproductiva (ASESA). Se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva en las bibliotecas Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, Cochrane y MedRxiv. No se ha confirmado la orquitis como una posible complicación de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Un estudio informó que el 19% de los hombres con COVID-19 presentaban molestias escrotales sugestivas de orquitis viral, que no se pudo confirmar. Es posible que el virus no infecte los testículos directamente, si no que desencadene una respuesta autoinmune secundaria y que cause una orquitis autoinmune. COVID-19 se ha asociado con anormalidades en la coagulación por lo que la orquitis podría ser el resultado de una vasculitis segmentaria. Los datos disponibles sobre la presencia del virus en semen son contradictorios. Sólo un estudio informó de la presencia de ARN en el 15,8% de enfermos de COVID-19. La presencia de ácido nucleico o antígeno en el semen no implica la existencia de virus con capacidad de replicación o infección. En hombres con COVID-19 se ha observado un incremento significativo de LH en suero y una drástica disminución de la ratio T/LH y FSH/LH, congruente con un hipogonadismo subclínico. Los datos disponibles y los hallazgos de los estudios recientes se basan en tamaños de muestra pequeños y proporcionan informaciones contradictorias. Existe la posibilidad teórica de que pueda producirse daño testicular y posterior infertilidad después de la infección por COVID-19, por lo que especialmente para aquellos hombres en edad reproductiva, se debe sugerir consulta y evaluación de la función gonadal y análisis de semen. En cuanto a la posibilidad de transmisión sexual, no hay evidencia suficiente para respaldar la necesidad de que las parejas asintomáticas eviten las relaciones sexuales para protegerse contra la transmisión del virus. Se necesita más investigación para comprender los impactos a largo plazo del SARS-CoV-2 en la función reproductiva masculina, incluidos sus posibles efectos sobre la fertilidad y la función endocrina testicular

Quantitative Pathology: Historical Background, Clinical Research and Application of Nuclear Morphometry and DNA Image Cytometry

Quantitative analysis of histo- and cytochemical components such as DNA, RNA or chromatin pattern on one hand (cytometry) and the quantitative analysis of geometric non-chemical cell and tissue components (morphometry and sterology) on the other, have developed somewhat independently. Today, many different techniques, such as morphometry, sterology, and static image and flow cytometry are well established and routinely used in diagnostic quantitative pathology. The potential significance of these techniques in the individualization of care in cancer patients include the objective distinction between benign, borderline and malignant lesions, objective grading of invasive tumours, prediction of prognosis, and therapy response

The relationship of serum and salivary cortisol levels to male sexual dysfunction as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function

To evaluate the biomarkers of sexual function, we investigated the relationship between questionnaire responses and biological hormones such as testosterone (T) and cortisol (F) in serum and saliva. The study population included 105 men aged 30–72 years (mean: 49±4.5, median: 49). Levels of all serum hormones (Total-T, Free-T, Bioavailable-T, Total-F and Bioavailable-F) and salivary hormones (Saliva-T and Saliva-F) were measured directly by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used as a questionnaire to evaluate sexual dysfunction. Free-T and Bioavailable-T showed significant inverse correlations with age (P<0.01). In the group not taking antidepressants, the levels of Bioavailable-F and Saliva-F showed significant inverse correlations with a portion of the IIEF score (P<0.05). However, reductions in Bioavailable-T and Saliva-T showed no association with the IIEF score. In the group taking antidepressants, these hormone levels showed no correlation with IIEF

Prognostic factors in prostate cancer

Prognostic factors in organ confined prostate cancer will reflect survival after surgical radical prostatectomy. Gleason score, tumour volume, surgical margins and Ki-67 index have the most significant prognosticators. Also the origins from the transitional zone, p53 status in cancer tissue, stage, and aneuploidy have shown prognostic significance. Progression-associated features include Gleason score, stage, and capsular invasion, but PSA is also highly significant. Progression can also be predicted with biological markers (E-cadherin, microvessel density, and aneuploidy) with high level of significance. Other prognostic features of clinical or PSA-associated progression include age, IGF-1, p27, and Ki-67. In patients who were treated with radiotherapy the survival was potentially predictable with age, race and p53, but available research on other markers is limited. The most significant published survival-associated prognosticators of prostate cancer with extension outside prostate are microvessel density and total blood PSA. However, survival can potentially be predicted by other markers like androgen receptor, and Ki-67-positive cell fraction. In advanced prostate cancer nuclear morphometry and Gleason score are the most highly significant progression-associated prognosticators. In conclusion, Gleason score, capsular invasion, blood PSA, stage, and aneuploidy are the best markers of progression in organ confined disease. Other biological markers are less important. In advanced disease Gleason score and nuclear morphometry can be used as predictors of progression. Compound prognostic factors based on combinations of single prognosticators, or on gene expression profiles (tested by DNA arrays) are promising, but clinically relevant data is still lacking

The Morbidity of Prolonged Wound Drainage after Kidney Transplantation

PURPOSE: The consequences of prolonged wound drainage, defined as extravasation of more than 50 ml. fluid daily for more than 1 week through a drain or wound after renal transplantation, have not been well described in the literature. We examine the association of prolonged wound drainage with other clinical events, and its impact on hospitalization, and patient and graft survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively documented prolonged wound drainage in 392 recipients of cadaver and live renal transplants from July 1993 to December 1997. Potential risk factors, associated outcomes within the first 6 months and effect on length of hospital stay due to prolonged wound drainage were determined. RESULTS: Prolonged wound drainage was significantly associated with pre-transplantation weight, weight gain by post-transplantation day 3, delayed graft function and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis on univariate analysis but only with delayed graft function (odds ratio 2.8, 95% confidence intervals 1.4 to 5.6) on multivariate analysis. Post-transplantation lymphoceles (5.2, 9 to 14), wound infection (27, 5.7 to 130) and wound dehiscence (5.8, 1.7 to 20) were associated with prolonged wound drainage. Patients with prolonged wound drainage stayed 8.7 additional days during the first hospitalization and overall 11.3 additional days during the first 6 months after transplantation independent of other co-morbid events, such as delayed graft function, rejection or cytomegalovirus disease. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged wound drainage is an important post-renal transplantation event that impacts patient outcomes and hospital resource use. Efforts to prevent this complication should be considered