Acute Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion and Minor Clinical Deficits: Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Implications

Background and Purpose: The optimal acute management of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and minor clinical deficits on admission [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 4] remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic factors and therapeutic management of those patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated (1) all patients with acute ischemic stroke due to an LVO who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and (2) all patients with minor clinical deficits (NIHSS ≤ 4) on admission due to an LVO between January 2013 and December 2016 at the University Medical Center Erlangen. We dichotomized management of patients with minor deficits treated with MT for analysis according to immediate mechanical thrombectomy (IT) and initial medical management with rescue intervention (MM) in case of secondary deterioration. Primary endpoints were secondary deterioration, in-hospital mortality, and functional outcome on day 90 (dichotomized modified Rankin Scale 0–2: favorable, 3–6: poor). Results: Two hundred twenty-three patients (83% with anterior circulation stroke, 13 (6%) with minor deficits) treated with MT and 88 patients with minor deficits due to LVO [13 (15%) treated with MT] were included. Secondary deterioration (n = 19) was independently associated with poor outcome in patients with minor deficits and LVO [odds ratio (OR), 0.060; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.013–0.280], which in turn was associated with the occlusion site [especially M1 occlusion: 11 (58%) vs. 3 (4%) in patients without secondary deterioration, p < 0.0001]. IT (n = 8) was associated with a lower intrahospital mortality compared to MM (n = 5; 13 vs. 80%; OR, 0.036; 95% CI, 0.002–0.741). Seven of eight patients with IT survived until discharge, with 29% showing a favorable functional outcome on day 90. Conclusions: Secondary deterioration is associated with poor outcome in patients with LVO and minor deficits, which in turn was associated with occlusion site. Future randomized controlled trials should assess whether selected patients, depending on occlusion site and associated characteristics, may benefit from MT

Ischemic stroke and dose adjustment of oral Factor Xa inhibitors in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background Oral Factor Xa inhibitors for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation require dose adjustment based on certain clinical criteria, but the off-label use of the reduced doses is common. Methods Data from an observational registry including patients admitted with acute cerebral ischemia while taking oral Factor Xa inhibitors for atrial fibrillation between April 2016 and December 2018 were investigated. The dose regimen of the Xa inhibitor was classified as “appropriate”, “underdosed” and “overdosed” in conformity with the European Medicines Agency labelling. The effect of underdosing on the functional factor Xa plasma level on admission, the clinical stroke severity and the functional outcome after 3 months were investigated. Results 254 patients with cerebral ischemia while on Factor Xa inhibitors were included. The dose regimen of the Factor Xa inhibitor was appropriate in 166 patients (65%), underdosed in 67 patients (26%) and overdosed in 21 patients (8%). Underdosing was associated with female sex, diabetes mellitus and higher CHA2DS2–Vasc scores. Underdosing independently predicted lower anti-Xa plasma levels on admission [median 69.4 ng/ml (IQR 0.0–121.6) vs. 129.2 ng/ml (65.5–207.2); p < 0.001], was associated with higher NIHSS scores on admission [median 5 (IQR 1–10) vs. 3 (1–7); p = 0.041] and worse functional outcome after 3 months (favorable outcome 26.9% vs. 46.9%; p = 0.025). Conclusion One in three patients with ischemic stroke during treatment with oral Xa inhibitors used inappropriate dose regimens. Underdosing was associated with lower functional plasma levels, higher clinical stroke severity and worse functional outcome

Ischemic stroke and dose adjustment of oral Factor Xa inhibitors in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background!#!Oral Factor Xa inhibitors for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation require dose adjustment based on certain clinical criteria, but the off-label use of the reduced doses is common.!##!Methods!#!Data from an observational registry including patients admitted with acute cerebral ischemia while taking oral Factor Xa inhibitors for atrial fibrillation between April 2016 and December 2018 were investigated. The dose regimen of the Xa inhibitor was classified as 'appropriate', 'underdosed' and 'overdosed' in conformity with the European Medicines Agency labelling. The effect of underdosing on the functional factor Xa plasma level on admission, the clinical stroke severity and the functional outcome after 3 months were investigated.!##!Results!#!254 patients with cerebral ischemia while on Factor Xa inhibitors were included. The dose regimen of the Factor Xa inhibitor was appropriate in 166 patients (65%), underdosed in 67 patients (26%) and overdosed in 21 patients (8%). Underdosing was associated with female sex, diabetes mellitus and higher CHA!##!Conclusion!#!One in three patients with ischemic stroke during treatment with oral Xa inhibitors used inappropriate dose regimens. Underdosing was associated with lower functional plasma levels, higher clinical stroke severity and worse functional outcome