Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements

Many (inter)national standards exist to evaluate the resistance of mortar and concrete to carbonation. When a carbonation coefficient is used for performance comparison of mixtures or service life prediction, the applied boundary conditions during curing, preconditioning and carbonation play a crucial role, specifically when using latent hydraulic or pozzolanic supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). An extensive interlaboratory test (ILT) with twenty two participating laboratories was set up in the framework of RILEM TC 281-CCC ‘Carbonation of Concrete with SCMs’. The carbonation depths and coefficients determined by following several (inter)national standards for three cement types (CEM I, CEM II/B-V, CEM III/B) both on mortar and concrete scale were statistically compared. The outcomes of this study showed that the carbonation rate based on the carbonation depths after 91 days exposure, compared to 56 days or less exposure duration, best approximates the slope of the linear regression and those 91 days carbonation depths can therefore be considered as a good estimate of the potential resistance to carbonation. All standards evaluated in this study ranked the three cement types in the same order of carbonation resistance. Unfortunately, large variations within and between laboratories complicate to draw clear conclusions regarding the effect of sample pre-conditioning and carbonation exposure conditions on the carbonation performance of the specimens tested. Nevertheless, it was identified that fresh and hardened state properties alone cannot be used to infer carbonation resistance of the mortars or concretes tested. It was also found that sealed curing results in larger carbonation depths compared to water curing. However, when water curing was reduced from 28 to 3 or 7 days, higher carbonation depths compared to sealed curing were observed. This increase is more pronounced for CEM I compared to CEM III mixes. The variation between laboratories is larger than the potential effect of raising the CO concentration from 1 to 4%. Finally, concrete, for which the aggregate-to-cement factor was increased by 1.79 in comparison with mortar, had a carbonation coefficient 1.18 times the one of mortar

The Realization of Clinker-Reduced, Performance-Based Sustainable Concrete by the Micro-Filler, Eco-Filler Concept

In times of climate change, the reduction in embodied greenhouse gas emissions is a premise for sustainable concrete infrastructure. As Portland cement clinker is mainly responsible for the high CO2 emissions of concrete, its reduction is necessary. In order to be sustainable, the concrete must meet processing, mechanical and durability properties while taking cost aspects into account. The paper presents (i) the “micro-filler/eco-filler concept” for achieving a clinker reduced, optimised binder and (ii) a performance-based approach to put sustainable “Eco-concrete” into practice. Clinker is substituted by locally available inert fillers by at least two different particle size fractions and supplementary cementitious materials. The method is based on particle packing optimisation, reduction in water demand and optimisation of the mix ratio of the binder blend, which allows the performance requirements to be met. The new Eco-concretes deliver the desired performance in terms of processability, strength and durability (water penetration, frost, carbonation and chloride resistance) while lowering the environmental impact in comparison to standard concrete. One of the new mixes was used for a small animal passage tunnel. The direct comparison of the developed Eco-concrete and standard concrete showed a 24% reduction in CO2, while achieving satisfactory workability, stripping strength and durability performance

A new test for combined Ca-leaching and sulphate resistance of cementitious materials

Limitations in the understanding of chemical key controls on concrete damaging mechanisms exacerbate predictions on the long-term performance and durability of cementitious materials. Therefore, the scope of the project “ASSpC Advanced and Sustainable Sprayed Concrete” is to obtain a better mechanistic understanding of the processes underlying deleterious chemical attacks. The herein presented alternative test, loosely following the regulations of the German Building Authority (DIBt) testing procedure (the so-called SVA test) for sulphate resistance, investigates the resistance of concrete mixes with high levels of limestone substitution (35%, 50% and 65%) against sulphate attack in a 10 g L-1 Na2SO4 solution at ambient temperature. Powdered samples were used in favour of prisms or drill cores to accelerate alteration reactions and to eliminate variations in microstructure or porosity. Based on throughout chemical and mineralogical characterisation of the experimental solutions and solid materials, we identified and traced several mineral reactions taking place in a chronological order: (1) dissolution of portlandite and Ca-leaching from C-S-H started immediately at the beginning of the experiments and provided the physicochemical conditions favourable for (2) the precipitation of massive calcite and ettringite during the advanced stage of chemical attack. Ongoing changes in the aqueous composition indicate that C-S-H dissolves incongruently and may be transformed into Si-bearing hydrogarnet. The amount of precipitated ettringite is apparently controlled by the availability of calcium, sulphate and aluminium and the precipitation rate correlates with the superplasticiser demand of the concrete mixes and with the pH of the solution during the nucleation and crystal growth stages, respectively. Our test allows distinguishing between competing reaction paths and kinetics and is capable to provide new insights into concrete damaging mechanisms in sulphate-loaded aqueous environments

A new test for combined Ca-leaching and sulphate resistance of cementitious materials

Limitations in the understanding of chemical key controls on concrete damaging mechanisms exacerbate predictions on the long-term performance and durability of cementitious materials. Therefore, the scope of the project “ASSpC Advanced and Sustainable Sprayed Concrete” is to obtain a better mechanistic understanding of the processes underlying deleterious chemical attacks. The herein presented alternative test, loosely following the regulations of the German Building Authority (DIBt) testing procedure (the so-called SVA test) for sulphate resistance, investigates the resistance of concrete mixes with high levels of limestone substitution (35%, 50% and 65%) against sulphate attack in a 10 g L-1 Na2SO4 solution at ambient temperature. Powdered samples were used in favour of prisms or drill cores to accelerate alteration reactions and to eliminate variations in microstructure or porosity. Based on throughout chemical and mineralogical characterisation of the experimental solutions and solid materials, we identified and traced several mineral reactions taking place in a chronological order: (1) dissolution of portlandite and Ca-leaching from C-S-H started immediately at the beginning of the experiments and provided the physicochemical conditions favourable for (2) the precipitation of massive calcite and ettringite during the advanced stage of chemical attack. Ongoing changes in the aqueous composition indicate that C-S-H dissolves incongruently and may be transformed into Si-bearing hydrogarnet. The amount of precipitated ettringite is apparently controlled by the availability of calcium, sulphate and aluminium and the precipitation rate correlates with the superplasticiser demand of the concrete mixes and with the pH of the solution during the nucleation and crystal growth stages, respectively. Our test allows distinguishing between competing reaction paths and kinetics and is capable to provide new insights into concrete damaging mechanisms in sulphate-loaded aqueous environments

Wide-range optical pH imaging of cementitious materials exposed to chemically corrosive environments

The pH of concrete-based material is a key parameter for the assessment of its stability and durability, since a change in pH is usually associated with major types of chemical degradation such as carbonation, leaching and acid attacks. Conventional surface pH measurements with potentiometric flat surface electrodes have low spatial resolution, whereas optical pH visualization with indicator dyes (phenolphthalein) only indicates the areas with higher or lower pH than the pKa of the indicator. In this regard, it is key to develop wide-range imaging systems, enabling accurate and spatially resolved determination of pH variability for an advanced knowledge of degradation mechanisms. This contribution presents the enhancements made for a high-resolution optical pH imaging system based on fluorescent aza-BODIPY indicator dyes. The measurement range was increased to 6 pH units (pH 6.5 to pH 12.5) by a combination of two indicator dyes. Moreover, background scattering effects were sufficiently eliminated. With the improved sensor foils steep pH gradients (up to 3 pH units within 2 mm) were successfully recorded in various concrete specimens using a macro lens reaching a resolution of down to 35 µm per pixel

Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements

This report has been prepared by members of the working groups 1 and 2 within a framework of RILEM TC 281-CCC “Carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious materials” and further reviewed and approved by all members of the RILEM TC 281-CCC.Many (inter)national standards exist to evaluate the resistance of mortar and concrete to carbonation. When a carbonation coefficient is used for performance comparison of mixtures or service life prediction, the applied boundary conditions during curing, preconditioning and carbonation play a crucial role, specifically when using latent hydraulic or pozzolanic supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). An extensive interlaboratory test (ILT) with twenty two participating laboratories was set up in the framework of RILEM TC 281-CCC 'Carbonation of Concrete with SCMs'. The carbonation depths and coefficients determined by following several (inter)national standards for three cement types (CEM I, CEM II/B-V, CEM III/B) both on mortar and concrete scale were statistically compared. The outcomes of this study showed that the carbonation rate based on the carbonation depths after 91 days exposure, compared to 56 days or less exposure duration, best approximates the slope of the linear regression and those 91 days carbonation depths can therefore be considered as a good estimate of the potential resistance to carbonation. All standards evaluated in this study ranked the three cement types in the same order of carbonation resistance. Unfortunately, large variations within and between laboratories complicate to draw clear conclusions regarding the effect of sample pre-conditioning and carbonation exposure conditions on the carbonation performance of the specimens tested. Nevertheless, it was identified that fresh and hardened state properties alone cannot be used to infer carbonation resistance of the mortars or concretes tested. It was also found that sealed curing results in larger carbonation depths compared to water curing. However, when water curing was reduced from 28 to 3 or 7 days, higher carbonation depths compared to sealed curing were observed. This increase is more pronounced for CEM I compared to CEM III mixes. The variation between laboratories is larger than the potential effect of raising the CO2 concentration from 1 to 4%. Finally, concrete, for which the aggregate-to-cement factor was increased by 1.79 in comparison with mortar, had a carbonation coefficient 1.18 times the one of mortar.H. Vanoutrive has received internal funding from KU Leuven which made this interlaboratory study possible. P. Van den Heede, N. Alderete and Z. Liu are funded by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) (project No. G062720N, 12ZG820N and G0F3619N). The financial support of FWO is gratefully acknowledged