20 research outputs found

    Sensitivity and specificity of loss of heterozygosity analysis for the classification of rare germline variants in BRCA1/2: results of the observational AGO-TR1 study (NCT02222883)

    Get PDF
    Variant-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses may be useful to classify BRCA1/2 germline variants of unknown significance (VUS). The sensitivity and specificity of this approach, however, remains unknown. We performed comparative next-generation sequencing analyses of the BRCA1/2 genes using blood-derived and tumour-derived DNA of 488 patients with ovarian cancer enrolled in the observational AGO-TR1 trial (NCT02222883). Overall, 94 pathogenic, 90 benign and 24 VUS were identified in the germline. A significantly increased variant fraction (VF) of a germline variant in the tumour indicates loss of the wild-type allele; a decreased VF indicates loss of the variant allele. We demonstrate that significantly increased VFs predict pathogenicity with high sensitivity (0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91), poor specificity (0.63, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.73) and poor positive predictive value (PPV; 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.79). Significantly decreased VFs predict benignity with low sensitivity (0.26, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.35), high specificity (1.0, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00) and PPV (1.0, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). Variant classification based on significantly increased VFs results in an unacceptable proportion of false-positive results. A significantly decreased VF in the tumour may be exploited as a reliable predictor for benignity, with no false-negative result observed. When applying the latter approach, VUS identified in four patients can now be considered benign. Trial registration number NCT02222883

    Associations of common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with risk of breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Get PDF
    Introduction: More than 70 common alleles are known to be involved in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility, and several exhibit significant heterogeneity in their associations with different BC subtypes. Although there are differences in the association patterns between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and the general population for several loci, no study has comprehensively evaluated the associations of all known BC susceptibility alleles with risk of BC subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Methods: We used data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 carriers to analyze the associations between approximately 200,000 genetic variants on the iCOGS array and risk of BC subtypes defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and triple-negative- (TN) status; morphologic subtypes; histological grade; and nodal involvement. Results: The estimated BC hazard ratios (HRs) for the 74 known BC alleles in BRCA1 carriers exhibited moderate correlations with the corresponding odds ratios from the general population. However, their associations with ER-positive BC in BRCA1 carriers were more consistent with the ER-positive as

    Associations of common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with risk of breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Get PDF

    Associations of common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with risk of breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Get PDF
    Abstract Introduction More than 70 common alleles are known to be involved in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility, and several exhibit significant heterogeneity in their associations with different BC subtypes. Although there are differences in the association patterns between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and the general population for several loci, no study has comprehensively evaluated the associations of all known BC susceptibility alleles with risk of BC subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Methods We used data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 carriers to analyze the associations between approximately 200,000 genetic variants on the iCOGS array and risk of BC subtypes defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and triple-negative- (TN) status; morphologic subtypes; histological grade; and nodal involvement. Results The estimated BC hazard ratios (HRs) for the 74 known BC alleles in BRCA1 carriers exhibited moderate correlations with the corresponding odds ratios from the general population. However, their associations with ER-positive BC in BRCA1 carriers were more consistent with the ER-positive associations in the general population (intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45 to 0.74), and the same was true when considering ER-negative associations in both groups (ICC = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.72). Similarly, there was strong correlation between the ER-positive associations for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (ICC = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.78), whereas ER-positive associations in any one of the groups were generally inconsistent with ER-negative associations in any of the others. After stratifying by ER status in mutation carriers, additional significant associations were observed. Several previously unreported variants exhibited associations at P <10−6 in the analyses by PR status, HER2 status, TN phenotype, morphologic subtypes, histological grade and nodal involvement. Conclusions Differences in associations of common BC susceptibility alleles between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and the general population are explained to a large extent by differences in the prevalence of ER-positive and ER-negative tumors. Estimates of the risks associated with these variants based on population-based studies are likely to be applicable to mutation carriers after taking ER status into account, which has implications for risk prediction

    BRCA diagnostics of ovarian cancer. Molecular tumor testing since the introduction of PARP inhibitor therapy

    No full text
    Approximately 9000 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Germany each year. The most common subtype is high-grade serous ovarian cancer. A relevant proportion of these tumors are associated with mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) representing highly penetrant tumor suppressor genes with autosomal inheritance and play a crucial role in DNA repair mechanisms. These patients have predominantly germline mutations and less frequently have somatic BRCA mutations. Tumors harboring BRCA mutations show a significant improvement in progression-free survival under therapy with poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. In 2015 the first PARP inhibitor was approved for the therapy of high-grade serous ovarian cancer with BRCA mutations. Mutation analysis can be performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue within a few days

    Ein seltener oropharyngealer Befund - Das primÀres Merkelzell-Karzinom der Tonsille

    No full text

    Metastasierendes pleomorphes Adenom - ungewöhnliche PrĂ€sentation eines SpeicheldrĂŒsentumors

    No full text
    Einleitung: Das pleomorphe Adenom, der hĂ€ufigste benigne SpeicheldrĂŒsentumor, kann in seltenen FĂ€llen metastasieren. Hier beschreiben wir den Fall einer Patientin mit Metastasen eines pleomorphen Adenoms in der Lunge sowie im Bereich der Laterobasis.Methoden: Einundzwanzig Jahre nach Resektion eines pleomorphen Adenoms der Gl. parotidea stellt sich die Patientin mit HĂ€moptysen vor. In der CT-Diagnostik finden sich Rundherde in beiden LungenflĂŒgeln. Die Resektion ergibt jeweils den histologischen Befund der Metastase eines pleomorphen Adenoms.Drei Jahre spĂ€ter stellt sich die Patientin mit pulssynchronem OhrgerĂ€usch, Hörminderung links und einem otoskopisch sichtbaren Tumor hinter dem Trommelfell vor. Ein Paragangliom kann angiographisch ausgeschlossen werden. Die folgende Tumorbiopsie zeigt abermals den Befund eines pleomorphen Adenoms, sodass sich eine radikale Tumorentfernung anschließt. Bei Infiltration des N. facialis ist die Resektion des Nerven und Rekonstruktion mittels N. auricularis magnus-Interponat erforderlich. Zudem erfolgt eine Revisionsparotidektomie mit Entfernung eines Tumorknotens - erneut histologisch ein pleomorphes Adenom.Ergebnisse: Die histologische und immunhistochemische Aufarbeitung ergibt fĂŒr alle Lokalisationen ein pleomorphes Adenom ohne histologische MalignitĂ€tskriterien. Im weiteren Verlauf kommt es zu einer sehr guten Defektheilung des N. facialis bei bislang rezidivfreier Patientin.Schlussfolgerung: Der Fall weist auf die Bedeutung der Metastasierungstendenz mancher pleomorpher Adenome hin, welche beim Management dieser Erkrankung zu bedenken ist. Trotz fehlender histologischer MalignitĂ€tskriterien kann es hierbei zu malignem Wachstumsverhalten mit Metastasierung kommen.Der Erstautor gibt keinen Interessenkonflikt an

    The brave new world of endometrial cancer Future implications for adjuvant treatment decisions

    No full text
    Purpose For many decades, endometrial cancer (EC) has been considered as a homogenous tumor entity with good prognosis. The currently valid risk stratification considers clinical and pathological factors. Treatment recommendations differ considerably from country to country. Materials and methods The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network has shown that ECs should be reclassified into four novel molecular prognostic groups, with the potential of changing adjuvant management of EC patients: ultra-mutated, hyper-mutated, copy-number low, and copy-number high. Clinical examples are shown, and the available literature has been highlighted. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) guideline for endometrial cancer takes the new classification system into consideration for adjuvant treatment decisions and will be published this year. Results In the near future, we expect new treatment recommendations that may differ considerably from the clinicopathologically driven recommendations on the basis of our deeper insight and better understanding of molecular markers in endometrial cancer. The PORTEC 4a study is the only recruiting study which randomizes patients to adjuvant or no adjuvant treatment on the basis of the aforementioned new classification system. Conclusion The aim of the new classification is a more personalized adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy decision and better oncologic outcomes or avoidance of overtreatment
    corecore