L' activation éosinophilique dans les lymphomes T cutanés primitifs

PARIS7-Bibliothèque centrale (751132105) / SudocSudocFranceF

Topical non-occlusive polymers in hand-foot Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Many cytotoxic and biological drugs are cause of severe dermatological side effects, such as hand-foot syndrome (HFS) and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR). Oncologic patients with HFS or HFSR presents relevant symptoms that interferes with daily activities and with adherence to anticancer treatment. The HFRS control and treatment are important goals to enhance the quality of life of oncologic patients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a b.i.d. (bis in die) topical administration of an anhydric ointment based on topical non-occlusive polymers (TNOP) in patients with HFS on current anticancer drug regiments. METHODS: A prospective, open, multicenter clinical study was conducted in oncologic patients with HFS attended two hospital-based Italian dermatological unit. A global-non-instrumental evaluation, based on different standardized tools (i.e., Sum Score System Index [SRRC] Score, Dermatology Life Qualiy Index [DLQI] and global efficacy) was conducted using measurements at baseline, at 4 and 8 weeks. Non-parametric test for two correlate samples, was used to assess changes in means of the different scores. The protocol was approved by ethical committee of both dermatology service pariticipating to the study. RESULTS: Twenty-one oncologic patients were enrolled. Thirteen (61.9%) of participants were female. The median age was 63 years (range: 37-73). Seventeen (80.9%) patients presenting a HFS associated to capecitabine, and four patients (19.1%) associated to docetaxel. At the enrollment, 33.3% (7/21) of patients showed at level of the hands a HFS of grade 2 and 9.5% (2/21) of grade 3. At level of the feet, 28.6% (6/21) showed a HFS of grade 2, and 17.4% (4/21) of grade 3. The SRRC scores were significantly decreased after 8 weeks of treatment compared to baseline, for both sites. In particular, SRRC score decreased from 4.38 to 1.67 (Z=-3.60, P=0.00) and from 4.48 to 1.43 (Z=-3.87, P=0.00) for hands and feet, respectively. A consistent significant improvement in the perceived QoL of patients was also observed. From baseline to visit 3, the total mean score of DLQI decreased from 10.62 to 4.57 (Δ=-57%, Z=-4.020, P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of oncologic patients with HFS, the b.i.d. administration of TNOP for eight weeks, induced a progressive and significant decrease of the SRRC Score and a relevant improvement in the perceived quality of life

Psoriasis Management Challenges Regarding Difficult-to-Treat Areas: Therapeutic Decision and Effectiveness

Psoriasis is not optimally controlled in spite of newly developed treatments, possibly due to the difficulty of objectively quantifying the disease’s severity, considering the limitations of the clinical scores used in clinical practice. A major challenge addresses difficult-to-treat areas, especially in the absence of significant body surface involvement. It is controversial whether the severity evaluation of patients with several affected areas (having at least one difficult-to-treat area) should be done differently from current methods. Scores used for special areas (PSSI, NAPSI and ESIF) allow an accurate assessment of disease severity in difficult-to-treat areas, but the issue of whether to integrate these scores into PASI, BSA or DLQI remains. The review’s purpose resides in providing an overview of the main current issues in determining psoriasis severity in patients with psoriasis in difficult-to-treat areas and suggesting possible solutions for the optimal integration of the area assessment in current scores: severity can be either established according to the highest calculated score (PASI or PSSI or NAPSI or ESIF) or by adding a correction factor in the calculation of PASI for special areas

Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)