GSTM1 (Glutathione S-transferase M1)

Review on GSTM1, with data on DNA, on the protein encoded, and where the gene is implicated

Polymorphic expression of glutathione transferases A1, M1, P1 and T1 in epithelial ovarian cancer: a Serbian case-control study

PURPOSE: Since several studies have proposed that epithelial ovarian cancer should not be considered as a single disease entity and that it results from an accumulation of genetic changes, we aimed to assess the polymorphic expression of major cytosolic glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1, T1, A1 and P1) with respect to ovarian cancer susceptibility and aggressiveness. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 93 newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer patients and 178 healthy matched controls. The multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect homozygous deletions of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. Analysis of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) GSTA1 C69T was performed using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), while for SNP GSTP1 Ile105Val real-time PCR was used. RESULTS: No significant association to ovarian cancer risk was found for individual GSTM1, GSTA1 and GSTP1 genotypes (p>0.05). However, the carriers of GSTT1-active genotype were at 2-fold higher risk of ovarian cancer development (95%CI: 1.00-4.01, p=0.049), which was even more elevated in the subgroup of patients with positive family history of cancer. Moreover, the frequency of all three GST genotypes that might be associated to ovarian cancer risk (GSTT1-active, GSTA1-active and GSTP1-referent) was significantly higher in patients than in the control group (p=0.042). Even more, patients who were carriers of combination of these three genotypes represented over 64% of the total number of patients within any of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages of ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides supportive evidence that GSTs might affect both susceptibility and progression of ovarian cance

Co-localization of GSTP1 and JNK in transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of urinary bladder belongs to glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) overexpressing tumors. Upregulated GSTP1 in TCC is related to apoptosis inhibition. This antiapoptotic effects of GSTP1 might be mediated through protein:protein interaction with c-Jun NH2 -terminal kinase (JNK). Herein, we analyzed whether a direct link between GSTP1 and JNK exists in TCC. The presence of GSTP1/JNK complexes was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting in 20 TCC specimens, obtained after surgery. Co-localization of GSTP1 and JNK was also investigated in the 5637 TCC cell line by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. By means of immunoprecipitation we show for the first time the presence of GSTP1/JNK complexes in all TCC samples studied. A co-localization of GSTP1 and JNK was also demonstrated in the 5637 TCC cell line by means of confocal microscopy. Protein-protein interactions, together with co-localization between GSTP1 and JNK provide evidence that GSTP1 most probably inhibits apoptosis in TCC cells by non-covalent binding to JNK

Is Increased Susceptibility to Balkan Endemic Nephropathy in Carriers of Common GSTA1 (*A/*B) Polymorphism Linked with the Catalytic Role of GSTA1 in Ochratoxin A Biotransformation? Serbian Case Control Study and In Silico Analysis

Although recent data suggest aristolochic acid as a putative cause of Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN), evidence also exists in favor of ochratoxin A (OTA) exposure as risk factor for the disease. The potential role of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, such as the glutathione transferases (GSTs), in OTA biotransformation is based on OTA glutathione adducts (OTHQ-SG and OTB-SG) in blood and urine of BEN patients. We aimed to analyze the association between common GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and BEN susceptibility, and thereafter performed an in silico simulation of particular GST enzymes potentially involved in OTA transformations. GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 genotypes were determined in 207 BEN patients and 138 non-BEN healthy individuals from endemic regions by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Molecular modeling in silico was performed for GSTA1 protein. Among the GST polymorphisms tested, only GSTA1 was significantly associated with a higher risk of BEN. Namely, carriers of the GSTA1*B gene variant, associated with lower transcriptional activation, were at a 1.6-fold higher BEN risk than those carrying the homozygous GSTA1*A/*A genotype (OR = 1.6; p = 0.037). In in silico modeling, we found four structures, two OTB-SG and two OTHQ-SG, bound in a GSTA1 monomer. We found that GSTA1 polymorphism was associated with increased risk of BEN, and suggested, according to the in silico simulation, that GSTA1-1 might be involved in catalyzing the formation of OTHQ-SG and OTB-SG conjugates

Glutathione S-transferase A1, M1, P1 and T1 null or low-activity genotypes are associated with enhanced oxidative damage among haemodialysis patients

Background. Increased oxidative stress is a hallmark of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics and protection of oxidative damage. We hypothesized that genetic polymorphism in antioxidant enzymes GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 is more frequent in ESRD and modulates the degree of oxidative stress in these patients. Methods. GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genotypes were determined in 199 ESRD patients and 199 age- and gender-matched controls. Markers of protein and lipid oxidative damage [thiol groups, carbonyl groups, advanced oxidative protein products, nitrotyrosine, malondialdehyde (MDA) and MDA adducts], together with total oxidant status and pro-oxidant antioxidant balance were determined. Results. Individual GST polymorphisms influence vulnerability to both protein and lipid oxidation, with GSTM1-null gene variant having the most pronounced effect. Furthermore, a strong combined effect of null/low-activity GSTM1, GSM, GSTA1 and GSTP1 genotypes in terms of susceptibility towards oxidative and carbonyl stress was found in ESRD patients. When patients were stratified according to GSTM1 and GSTT1, the highest oxidant damage was noted in those with the GSTM1-null/GSTT1-null genotype. The observed effect was even stronger in patients with the third low-activity GSTP1 or GSTA1 genotype. Finally, the level of oxidative and carbonyl stress was most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with all four null or low-activity GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and GSTA1 genotypes. Conclusions. According to the GST genotype, ESRD patients may be stratified in terms of the level of oxidative and carbonyl stress that might influence cardiovascular prognosis, but could also improve efforts towards individualization of antioxidant treatment

BMP axis in cancer cachexia

BACKGROUND Cancer cachexia is a devastating metabolic syndrome characterized by systemic inflammation and massive muscle and adipose tissue wasting. Although cancer cachexia is responsible for about 25% of cancer deaths, no effective therapies are available, and the underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Its occurrence complicates patients’ management, reduces tolerance to treatments and negatively affects patient quality of life. Muscle wasting, mainly due to increased protein breakdown rates, is one of the most prominent features of cachexia. Blocking muscle loss in cachexia mouse models dramatically prolongs survival even of animals in which tumor growth is not inhibited. Recent observations showed that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling, acting through Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 (Smad1/5/8), is a master regulator of muscle homeostasis. BMP-Smad1/5/8 axis negatively regulates a novel ubiquitin ligase (MUSA1) required for muscle loss induced by denervation. MATERIALS AND METHODS First aim of the present work was to test if alterations of the BMP signaling pathway occur in cancer-induced muscle wasting in patients. For this purpose we checked the state of activation of the BMP pathway in muscle of cachectic vs non–cachectic patients affected by colon, pancreatic and esophagus cancer and in control subjects. We checked by Western Blot the phosphorylation levels of Smad1/5/8 and of Smad3 and by quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) the expression levels of different atrophy-related genes The second aim was to evaluate the degree of muscle atrophy and distribution of muscle fibers in patients and control subjects using morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses. We also performed analysis on distribution of NCAM positive muscle fibers to assess the effect of denervation on muscle tropism. RESULTS From December 2014 we collected 95 rectus abdominis muscle biopsies of cancer patients and 11 from control subjects. In line with the results we obtained in C26 mice model (a well-established cancer cachexia experimental model) Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation, readout of the state of activation of the BMP pathway, was nearly completely abrogated in the muscles of cancer cachectic patients compared to cancer non-cachectic ones. Interestingly, the level of phosphorylation of Smad3 was not significantly affected suggesting specific effects of cancer growth on BMP pathway. The expression levels of different atrophy-related genes including MUSA1 were induced in the cachectic muscles. Interestingly, several BMP related genes are also changing the expression during cancer growth. We also found a correlation between suppression of BMP pathway, expression of atrophy related genes and Noggin, known to block BMP pathway. Morphometric analysis shown that patients with cancer cachexia have smaller myofiber diameter (in particular fast type fibers) in comparison to age-matched controls. In skeletal muscle from cancer patients (either cachectic or non-cachectic) we detected a prevalence of flat shaped, angulated and severely atrophic myofibers (i.e. morphological features of denervated myofibers), big fiber-type grouping (i.e. typical hallmark of denervation/reinnervation events) and numerous NCAM positive myofibers (i.e. specific marker of denervation). CONCLUSIONS These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that BMP inhibition is permissive to cachexia onset. Since the reactivation of the BMP-dependent signaling and MUSA1 suppression was sufficient to prevent tumor-induced muscle atrophy in our C26 mouse model (data not shown), the present data suggest that the BMP axis can be an effective target for therapeutic approaches to counteract cachexia also in cancer patients. The results of morphometric and immunohistochemical studies collected till now may suggest that denervation contributes to myofiber atrophy in cancer cachexia

Glutathione Transferases: Potential Targets to Overcome Chemoresistance in Solid Tumors

Multifunctional enzymes glutathione transferases (GSTs) are involved in the development of chemoresistance, thus representing a promising target for a novel approach in cancer treatment. This superfamily of polymorphic enzymes exhibits extraordinary substrate promiscuity responsible for detoxification of numerous conventional chemotherapeutics, at the same time regulating signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis. In addition to upregulated GST expression, different cancer cell types have a unique GST signature, enabling targeted selectivity for isoenzyme specific inhibitors and pro-drugs. As a result of extensive research, certain GST inhibitors are already tested in clinical trials. Catalytic properties of GST isoenzymes are also exploited in bio-activation of specific pro-drugs, enabling their targeted accumulation in cancer cells with upregulated expression of the appropriate GST isoenzyme. Moreover, the latest approach to increase specificity in treatment of solid tumors is development of GST pro-drugs that are derivatives of conventional anti-cancer drugs. A future perspective is based on the design of new drugs, which would selectively target GST overexpressing cancers more prone to developing chemoresistance, while decreasing side effects in off-target cells

<i>GSTM1</i> and <i>GSTP1</i> Polymorphisms Affect Outcome in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Background and Objectives: Despite improvements in screening programs, a large number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are diagnosed in an advanced disease stage. Previous investigations imply that glutathione transferases (GSTs) might be associated with the development and progression of CRC. Moreover, the detoxification mechanism of oxaliplatin, which represents the first line of treatment for advanced CRC, is mediated via certain GSTs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of certain GST genetic variants on CRC prognosis and the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based treatment. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 523 patients diagnosed with CRC in the period between 2014 and 2016, at the Digestive Surgery Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade. Patients were followed for a median of 43.47 ± 17.01 months (minimum 1–63 months). Additionally, 109 patients with advanced disease, after surgical treatment, received FOLFOX6 treatment as a first-line therapy between 2014 and 2020. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze cumulative survival, and the Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to study the effects of different GST genotypes on overall survival. Results: Individuals with the GSTM1-null genotype and the GSTP1 IleVal+ValVal (variant) genotype had significantly shorter survival when compared to referent genotypes (GSTM1-active and GSTP1 IleIle) (log-rank: p = 0.001). Moreover, individuals with the GSTM1-null genotype who received 5-FU-based treatment had statistically significantly shorter survival when compared to individuals with the GSTM1-active genotype (log-rank: p = 0.05). Conclusions: Both GSTM1-null and GSTP1 IleVal+ValVal (variant) genotypes are associated with significantly shorter survival in CRC patients. What is more, the GSTM1-null genotype is associated with shorter survival in patients receiving FOLOFOX6 treatment

Glutathione Transferase P1: Potential Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer

Chemotherapy resistance of ovarian cancer, regarded as the most lethal malignant gynecological disease, can be explained by several mechanisms, including increased activity of efflux transporters leading to decreased intracellular drug accumulation, increased efflux of the therapeutic agents from the cell by multidrug-resistance-associated protein (MRP1), enhanced DNA repair, altered apoptotic pathways, silencing of a number of genes, as well as drug inactivation, especially by glutathione transferase P1 (GSTP1). Indeed, GSTP1 has been recognized as the major enzyme responsible for the conversion of drugs most commonly used to treat metastatic ovarian cancer into less effective forms. Furthermore, GSTP1 may even be responsible for chemoresistance of non-GST substrate drugs by mechanisms such as interaction with efflux transporters or different signaling molecules involved in regulation of apoptosis. Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been identified as important gene regulators in ovarian cancer, which are able to target GST-mediated drug metabolism in order to regulate drug resistance. So far, miR-186 and miR-133b have been associated with reduced ovarian cancer drug resistance by silencing the expression of the drug-resistance-related proteins, GSTP1 and MDR1. Unfortunately, sometimes miRNAs might even enhance the drug resistance in ovarian cancer, as shown for miR-130b. Therefore, chemoresistance in ovarian cancer treatment represents a very complex process, but strategies that influence GSTP1 expression in ovarian cancer as a therapeutic target, as well as miRNAs affecting GSTP1 expression, seem to represent promising predictors of chemotherapeutic response in ovarian cancer, while at the same time represent potential targets to overcome chemoresistance in the future