How breast cancer treatments affect the quality of life of women with non-metastatic breast cancer one year after surgical treatment: a cross-sectional study in Greece

Background: The continuously increasing survivorship of female breast cancer makes the monitoring and improvement of patients' quality of life ever so important. While globally there is a growing body of research on health-related quality of life 1 year after surgical treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer, up-to-date information regarding Greek patients is scarce. Objective: To measure the level of QoL of non-metastatic BC survivors in Greece 1 year after surgery. Methods: A sample of 200 female breast cancer survivors aged 18 to 75, who followed up as outpatients in five public hospitals were included in this cross-sectional study. All recruited patients agreed to participate in the study (100% response rate). Quality of life data were collected through the EORTC QLQ-C30 as well as BR23 questionnaires. Results: Cronbach's alpha for all scales of the two questionnaires was from 0.551 to 0.936 indicating very good reliability. According to the Multiple Linear Regression, older patients showed a lower future perspective (p =.031), with those living in rural areas, which was associated with more financial difficulties (p =.001). Women with tertiary education and those who had been hospitalized in a university hospital recorded better on global health status (p =.003 and.000 respectively). Patients who underwent chemotherapy reported better scores in the emotional function sub-scale (p =.025). Women with reconstruction and at least one complication appeared to have significantly better scores in future perspective and social function (p =.005,.002 respectively). Conclusions: Breast cancer survivors were found to have an overall good quality of life, functioning/symptoms scores and were satisfied with the provided care

High Alloreactivity of Low-Dose Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients with Acute Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with an Alemtuzumab-Containing Conditioning Regimen

AbstractThe value of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pDLI) is unclear and differs among diseases and transplantation protocols. Experience with this approach in patients with acute leukemia undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with an alemtuzumab-incorporating conditioning protocol is lacking. We conducted a single-center prospective study to investigate the applicability and efficacy of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pDLI) in patients with leukemia undergoing HCT with a low-dose alemtuzumab-containing conditioning regimen. Inclusion criteria were high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or increasing mixed chimerism. All patients included were tapered off of immunotherapy. Exclusion criteria were a history of ≥grade II or active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Of the 56 consecutive patients who underwent HCT with an alemtuzumab-containing regimen, 15 patients (8 with acute myelogenous leukemia and 7 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia) met the study inclusion criteria and received prophylactic DLI (total of 45 infusions) from 7 sibling donors and 8 unrelated donors. The first infusion was given at a median of 162 days posttransplantation. The median number of DLIs was 3, and the median cumulative CD3+ cell dose was 2 × 106cells/kg. Six of the 8 patients (75%) who received pDLI while in mixed chimerism converted to stable, complete donor chimerism. Some 47% of DLI recipients developed GVHD (4 acute GVHD and 3 with chronic GVHD) after a median cumulative dose of 2 × 106 CD3+ cells/kg. After a median follow-up of 575 days, 11 (73%) pDLI recipients were alive. All 4 deaths were due to GVHD-related causes. None of the patients who received pDLIs relapsed. Patients with leukemia who received low-dose pDLI after conditioning with alemtuzumab are at low risk for relapse; however, this approach is associated with a relatively high incidence of severe GVHD