Depression as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization among hemodialysis patients in the United States and Europe

Depression as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization among hemodialysis patients in the United States and Europe.BackgroundDepression is not uncommon among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) being treated by hemodialysis. We investigated whether risk of mortality and rate of hospitalization may be predicted from physician-diagnosed depression and patients' self-reports of depressive symptoms.MethodsData were analyzed from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) for randomly selected ESRD patients being treated by hemodialysis in the United States (142 facilities, 2855 patients) and five European countries (101 facilities, 2401 patients). The diagnosis of depression during the past year was abstracted from the medical records. In addition, the patients were asked to indicate how much of their time over the previous four weeks they had felt (1) “so down in the dumps that nothing could cheer you up” and (2) “downhearted and blue.” A response of “a good bit,”“most,” or “all” of the time were classified as depressed.ResultsThe prevalence of depression was nearly 20%. The relative risks of mortality and hospitalization among depressed (vs. non-depressed), adjusted for time on dialysis, age, race, socioeconomic status, comorbid indicators and country were, respectively: 1.23 and 1.11 for physician-diagnosed depression, 1.48 and 1.15 for the “so down in the dumps” question, and 1.35 and 1.11 for the “downhearted and blue” question (P < 0.05 for all six relative risks). These associations were not significantly different between US and European patients.ConclusionsSelf-reported depression by two simple questions was associated with increased risks of mortality and hospitalization for hemodialysis patients. Future research needs to assess whether early identification and treatment of depression may help to improve quality of life and survival in hemodialysis patients

Screening for depression in hemodialysis patients: Associations with diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the DOPPS

Screening for depression in hemodialysis patients: Associations with diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the DOPPS.BackgroundDepressive symptoms and depression are the most frequent psychologic problems reported by hemodialysis patients. We assessed the prevalence of depressive symptoms and physician-diagnosed depression, their variations by country, and associations with treatment by antidepressants among hemodialysis patients. We also assessed whether depressive symptoms were independently associated with mortality, hospitalization, and dialysis withdrawal.MethodsThe sample was represented by 9382 hemodialysis patients randomly selected from dialysis centers of 12 countries enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS II). Depressive symptoms were assessed by the short version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Screening Index (CES-D), using ≥10 CES-D score as the cut-off value.ResultsOverall prevalence of physician-diagnosed depression was 13.9%, and percentage of CES-D score ≥10 43.0%. While the smallest prevalence of physician-diagnosed depression was observed in Japan (2.0%) and France (10.6%), the percentage of CES-D score ≥10 in these counties was similar to the whole sample. Patients on antidepressants also varied by country, 34.9% and 17.3% among those with physician-diagnosed depression and CES-D scores ≥10, respectively. In Cox models adjusted for several comorbidities, CES-D scores ≥10 were associated with significantly higher relative risks (RR) of death (RR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.57), hospitalization (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.22), and dialysis withdrawal (RR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.85).ConclusionThe data suggest that depression is underdiagnosed and undertreated among hemodialysis patients. CES-D can help identify hemodialysis patients who are at higher risk of death and hospitalization. Interventions should target these patients with the goal to improve survival and reduce hospitalizations

The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): How Can We Improve the Care of Hemodialysis Patients?

Outcomes among dialysis patients vary considerably internationally and across regions within the United States. The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) is a large, prospective, observational study of representative samples of hemodialysis patients in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The DOPPS collects a wealth of data regarding the patients' demographic characteristics, medical histories, laboratory values, prescriptions, dialysis unit practices, and outcomes. The study seeks to clarify which dialysis practices contribute to improved mortality rates, hospitalization rates, health related quality of life, and vascular access outcomes, after adjusting for the effects of comorbid disease and demographic variables. Over 18,000 patients have been enrolled to date. This paper describes the initial findings and outlines the plans to expand the trial.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75010/1/j.1525-139X.2001.00043.x.pd

Factors associated with health-related quality of life among hemodialysis patients in the DOPPS

n/

Recovery time, quality of life, and mortality in hemodialysis patients: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

BACKGROUND There is limited information about the clinical and prognostic significance of patient-reported recovery time. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 6,040 patients in the DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study). PREDICTOR Answer to question "How long does it take you to recover from a dialysis session?" categorized as follows: fewer than 2, 2-6, 7-12, or longer than 12 hours. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between recovery time and patient characteristics, hemodialysis treatment variables, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS 32% reported recovery time shorter than 2 hours; 41%, 2-6 hours; 17%, 7-12 hours; and 10%, longer than 12 hours. Using proportional odds (ordinal) logistic regression, shorter recovery time was associated with male sex, full-time employment, and higher serum albumin level. Longer recovery time was associated with older age, dialysis vintage, body mass index, diabetes, and psychiatric disorder. Greater intradialytic weight loss, longer dialysis session length, and lower dialysate sodium concentration were associated with longer recovery time. In facilities that used uniform dialysate sodium concentrations for ≥90% of patients, the adjusted OR of longer recovery time, comparing dialysate sodium concentration12 vs 2-6 hours 1.22 [95% CI, 1.09-1.37] and 1.47 [95% CI, 1.19-1.83], respectively). LIMITATIONS Answers are subjective and not supported by physiologic measurements. CONCLUSIONS Recovery time can be used to identify patients with poorer HRQoL and higher risks of hospitalization and mortality. Interventions to reduce recovery time and possibly improve clinical outcomes, such as increasing dialysate sodium concentration, need to be tested in randomized trials

Associations of self-reported physical activity types and levels with quality of life, depression symptoms, and mortality in hemodialysis patients: the DOPPS.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Physical activity has been associated with better health status in diverse populations, but the association in patients on maintenance hemodialysis is less established. Patient-reported physical activities and associations with mortality, health-related quality of life, and depression symptoms in patients on maintenance hemodialysis in 12 countries were examined. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In total, 5763 patients enrolled in phase 4 of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (2009-2011) were classified into five aerobic physical activity categories (never/rarely active to very active) and by muscle strength/flexibility activity using the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity questionnaire. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life scale was used for health-related quality of life. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale was used for depression symptoms. Linear regression was used for associations of physical activity with health-related quality of life and depression symptoms scores. Cox regression was used for association of physical activity with mortality. RESULTS The median (interquartile range) of follow-up was 1.6 (0.9-2.5) years; 29% of patients were classified as never/rarely active, 20% of patients were classified as very active, and 20.5% of patients reported strength/flexibility activities. Percentages of very active patients were greater in clinics offering exercise programs. Aerobic activity, but not strength/flexibility activity, was associated positively with health-related quality of life and inversely with depression symptoms and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio of death for very active versus never/rarely active, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.77). Similar associations with aerobic activity were observed in strata of age, sex, time on dialysis, and diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS The findings are consistent with the health benefits of aerobic physical activity for patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Greater physical activity was observed in facilities providing exercise programs, suggesting a possible opportunity for improving patient outcomes