Hemostasis testing in patients with liver dysfunction: Advantages and caveats

International audienceDue to concomitant changes in pro- and anti-coagulant mechanisms, patients with liver dysfunction have a “rebalanced hemostasis”, which can easily be tipped toward either a hypo- or a hypercoagulable phenotype. Clinicians are often faced with the question whether patients with chronic liver disease undergoing invasive procedures or surgery and those having active bleeding require correction of the hemostasis abnormalities. Conventional coagulation screening tests, such as the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio and the activated partial thromboplastin time have been demonstrated to have numerous limitations in these patients and do not predict the risk of bleeding prior to high-risk procedures. The introduction of global coagulation assays, such as viscoelastic testing (VET), has been an important step forward in the assessment of the overall hemostasis profile. A growing body of evidence now suggests that the use of VET might be of significant clinical utility to prevent unnecessary infusion of blood products and to improve outcomes in numerous settings. The present review discusses the advantages and caveats of both conventional and global coagulation assays to assess the risk of bleeding in patients with chronic liver disease as well as the current role of transfusion and hemostatic agents to prevent or manage bleeding

Antiplatelet Agents for Cancer Prevention: Current Evidences and Continuing Controversies

International audienceOver the past two decades, aspirin has emerged as a promising chemoprotective agent to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). In 2016, the mounting evidence supporting its chemoprotective effect, from both basic science and clinical research, led the US Preventive Services Task Force to recommend regular use of low-dose aspirin in some subgroups of patients for whom the benefits are deemed to outweigh the risks. In contrast, data on the chemoprotective effect of aspirin against other cancers are less clear and remain controversial. Most data come from secondary analyses of cardiovascular prevention trials, with only a limited number reporting cancer outcomes as a prespecified endpoint, and overall unclear findings. Moreover, the potential chemoprotective effect of aspirin against other cancers has been recently questioned with the publication of 3 long-awaited trials of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases reporting no benefit of aspirin on overall cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality. Data on the chemoprotective effects of other antiplatelet agents remain scarce and inconclusive, and further research to examine their benefit are warranted. In this narrative review, we summarize current clinical evidence and continuing controversies on the potential chemoprotective properties of antiplatelet agents against cancer

Are Patients with Active Cancer and Those with History of Cancer Carrying the Same Risks of Recurrent VTE and Bleeding While on Anticoagulants?

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are now recommended for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) based on the results of dedicated trials demonstrating that DOAC are non-inferior to low molecular weight heparins in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population. The definition of “cancer patient” differs substantially among studies. Whether patients with active cancer and those with a history of cancer (HOC) carry the same risks of recurrent VTE and bleeding remains unclear. Few studies reported data on the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants according to active cancer or HOC categories. While in subgroup analyses of EINSTEIN and HOKUSAI the rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding did not differ between these categories, results from a subgroup analysis of AMPLIFY, from HOKUSAI-Cancer, and from the COMMAND cohort suggest that HOC patients might have a lower bleeding risk than active cancer patients. Whether the inclusion of HOC patients in CAT studies might introduce some bias by decreasing the rates of both recurrent VTE and bleeding remains an unanswered issue since no dedicated prospective study addressed this question. A strict definition of active cancer should be used in further trials

Utilisation des drones pour l'évaluation des dégâts de la faune (sanglier - Sus scrofa) à l'agriculture (maïs - Zea mays)

peer reviewedDamage caused by ungulates to agricultural areas are difficult to evaluate because the real extent of the damage remains usually poorly described and potentially arising conflicts. Recent advances in unmanned aerial system (UAS) provide new versatile mapping and quantification possibilities in a wide range of applications. We used crop fields (Zea mays) damaged by wild boar (Sus scrofa) and compared the extent of the damage by means of three methods: i) traditional ground-based assessment ii) UAS orthoimages with operator delineation and iii) UAS Crop Height Model with automatic delineation based on height threshold. We showed for the first time that UAS could be applied for assessing damage of ungulates to agriculture. The two methods using UAS imagery provide coherent and satisfactory results and trended to underestimate the damage area when compared to in-use ground-based field expertise. However we suggest that performance of UAS should further be tested in variable conditions in order to assess the broad application of this tool. Our study describes the potential of UAS as a tool for estimating more accurately the damage area and subsequently the compensation costs for wildlife damage. The proposed approach can come in support of local and regional policies for the definitions of compensation for farmers

How to avoid systematic postoperative blood test after total hip arthroplasty: A new risk scoring system compared to Wu's score.

BACKGROUND: Routine laboratory studies are often performed following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, lately, their necessity has been challenged and risk factors for postoperative transfusion are still debated. Recently, a risk scoring system to single out patients that should have a postoperative blood test has been published by Wu et al. The purposes of this retrospective study were: (1) to validate this recently published risk scoring system to identify patients who should have a postoperative laboratory test; (2) to single out risk factors of postoperative transfusion; (3) to determine if another score can more accurately predict the need for postoperative transfusion. HYPOTHESIS: Wu et al.'s risk scoring system can accurately identify patients who should have a postoperative blood test. METHODS: In all, 1693 patients who underwent primary THAs between June 2015 and October 2020 were screened for potential eligibility to include 1000 patient for analysis. Preoperative and postoperative blood tests were done for every patient. Clinical information and laboratory results were retrospectively collected and analyzed. A descriptive analysis followed by univariate and multivariate analysis were sequentially performed. A multiple logistic regression model was employed to determine a formula predicting the transfusion risk called THABUS for Total Hip Arthroplasty Blood test Usefulness Score. The risk scoring system for complete blood count published by Wu et al. in may 2020 was performed for every patient and compared to the THABUS predictive model. RESULTS: The transfusion rate was 2.3% (23/1000). The risk-scoring system published by Wu and al. showed that a laboratory test was necessary for 60.6% (606/1000) however 13% (3/23) of the patients who needed a blood transfusion were missed by the risk-scoring system, giving it a sensitivity of 86.95% and a specificity of 40%. Increasing age, arterial hypertension, female gender, low preoperative hemoglobin, ASA score≥2 and diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head were significantly associated with postoperative transfusion. The THABUS formula can predict the risk for transfusion with a sensibility of 96.65% and a specificity of 75.54%. In our cohort of 1000 patients, following the THABUS formula would have led to 261 postoperative blood test and cost savings of 32,132$. Only one patient (4.3%) was missed by our new score. The THABUS formula is significantly better than Wu et al.'s complete blood count score in identifying both patient that will need a transfusion (p<0.01) and those who shouldn't have a postoperative blood test (p<0.001). Medical intervention because of creatinine or electrolytes abnormality was needed in 0.3% (3/1000) of patients. DISCUSSION: In this study Wu et al.'s recently published complete blood count risk-scoring system was not validated. However, in the studied population the THABUS formula can accurately target patients who might need a transfusion. The use of the THABUS formula could reduce hospitalization costs without compromising the patients' safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study