Genotypic variability enhances the reproducibility of an ecological study

Many scientific disciplines are currently experiencing a “reproducibility crisis” because numerous scientific findings cannot be repeated consistently. A novel but controversial hypothesis postulates that stringent levels of environmental and biotic standardization in experimental studies reduces reproducibility by amplifying impacts of lab-specific environmental factors not accounted for in study designs. A corollary to this hypothesis is that a deliberate introduction of controlled systematic variability (CSV) in experimental designs may lead to increased reproducibility. We tested this hypothesis using a multi-laboratory microcosm study in which the same ecological experiment was repeated in 14 laboratories across Europe. Each laboratory introduced environmental and genotypic CSV within and among replicated microcosms established in either growth chambers (with stringent control of environmental conditions) or glasshouses (with more variable environmental conditions). The introduction of genotypic CSV led to lower among-laboratory variability in growth chambers, indicating increased reproducibility, but had no significant effect in glasshouses where reproducibility was generally lower. Environmental CSV had little effect on reproducibility. Although there are multiple causes for the “reproducibility crisis”, deliberately including genetic variation may be a simple solution for increasing the reproducibility of ecological studies performed in controlled environments

Measurement precision and accuracy of high artificial enrichment 15N and 13C tracer samples

ISSN:1097-0231ISSN:0951-419

Patterns of total root and shoot carbon dioxide fluxes and their impact on daily tree carbon budget in large tropical tree saplings

A significant amount of the carbon (C) assimilated in photosynthesis by trees is re-emitted to the atmosphere via the respiratory CO2 flux of roots. Because of technical constraints, we have little understanding of the extent and dynamics of the respiratory CO2 flux of roots at the total root system scale (RCF). This study aimed to fill this gap and to quantify the daily C budget of entire trees. We used aeroponics as a novel approach to measure directly and simultaneously RCF and the net CO2 flux of the entire shoot (SCF), to estimate their night- and day-time contributions to daily tree CO2 budget and to estimate the relative contribution of different root categories to RCF in large saplings of the tropical tree species Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. By maintaining root temperature within a narrow range (24-27.5 degrees C), we controlled for its effect on RCF, thus allowing the potential relationship between RCF and SCF to be tested. The carbon gain of the fast-growing saplings was 0.79 +/- 0.10 g C sapling(-1) day(-1), with day-time shoot CO2 uptake outweighing night-time shoot and day- and night-time root CO2 losses by a factor of two. Other than a slight rise in the morning hours, RCF was relatively stable and not coupled to the daily dynamics of SCF. Albeit having lower specific respiration rates compared with fine-roots, the relative contributions of coarse-roots (diameter >2 mm) to RCF were substantial because of their large biomass and were estimated to range from 43 to 63% of RCF at midday of different days during the growing season. The results of this study suggest that (i) the entire root system needs to be monitored for its impact on the tree CO2 budget, (ii) RCF cannot be derived from SCF and (iii) the importance of coarse-root respiration to RCF may be greater than appreciated.ISSN:0829-318XISSN:1758-446

Data from 14 labortories testing the impact of introduced variability on the reproducibility of a microcosm ecological experiment

Although microcosm experiments are a frequent tool used to address fundamental ecological questions, there has been no quantitative assessment of the reproducibility of any microcosm experiment. This dataset contains the response variables measured in a multi-laboratory microcosm study in which the same microcosm experiment was repeated in 14 laboratories across Europe. All laboratories simultaneously run a simple microcosm experiment using grass (Brachypodium distachyon L.) monocultures and grass and legume (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.) mixtures. All twelve variables were then used to calculate the effect of the presence of nitrogen-fixing legume on the grass-legume mixtures (i.e. the net legume effect). The project tested a controversial hypotheses postulating that stringent levels of environmental and biotic standardization in experimental studies reduces reproducibility by amplifying impacts of lab-specific environmental factors not accounted for in the experimental design. This implies that the deliberate introduction of controlled systematic variability (CSV) in experimental designs can increase reproducibility. To test this hypothesis, each laboratory followed the same experimental protocol and introduced environmental and genotypic controlled systematic variability (CSV) within and among replicated microcosms established in either growth chambers (with stringent control of environmental conditions) or glasshouses (with more variable environmental conditions). Data were used to test the extent to which the effect size of the net legume effect varied with the CSV treatment and to estimate the number of laboratories that produced results that can be considered reproducible