2 research outputs found

    Collective Action and Decision Making: An Analysis of Economic Modeling and Environmental Free-Riding

    Get PDF
    It is hypothesized that tool-assisted excavation of plant underground storage organs (USOs) played an adaptive role in hominin evolution and was also once considered a uniquely human behavior. Recent data indicate that savanna chimpanzees also use tools to excavate edible USOs. However, those chimpanzees remain largely unhabituated and we lack direct observations of this behavior in the wild. To fill this gap in our knowledge of hominoid USO extractive foraging, we conducted tool-mediated excavation experiments with captive chimpanzees naive to this behavior. We presented the chimpanzees with the opportunity to use tools in order to excavate artificially-placed underground foods in their naturally forested outdoor enclosure. No guidance or demonstration was given to the chimpanzees at any time. The chimpanzees used tools spontaneously in order to excavate the underground foods. They exhibited six different tool use behaviors in the context of excavation: probe, perforate, dig, pound, enlarge and shovel. However, they still excavated manually more often than they did with tools. Chimpanzees were selective in their choice of tools that we provided, preferring longer tools for excavation. They also obtained their own tools mainly from naturally occurring vegetation and transported them to the excavation site. They reused some tools throughout the study. Our new data provide a direction for the study of variables relevant to modeling USO extractive foraging by early hominins.Funding Agencies|La Caixa Foundation Spain [LCF/BQ/EU15/10350002]; University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Norway</p

    Tool-use in excavation of underground food by captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implication for wild chimpanzee behavior

    Get PDF
    Extractive foraging of underground storage organs (USOs) is believed to have played an important role in human evolution. This behavior is also present in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), who sometimes use tools in the task. Despite the importance of studying this behavior in chimpanzees to model how early hominins may have used tools in the context of USO excavation, it remains to be directly observed due to the chimpanzees lack of habituation in the two study sites that yielded evidence of tool-use in USO excavation. Until now, no studies in captivity had been conducted to learn how chimpanzees could excavate underground food. The present experiment was designed to provide captive chimpanzees with opportunities to use tools in the excavation of artificially-placed underground food at their semi-naturally forested enclosure. The study was conducted independently with two groups of chimpanzees living at the Kristiansand Zoo, in Kristiansand, Norway. The experiment had three phases: food was placed inside holes that were 1) left open, 2) filled with regular soil, and 3) filled with clay. Materials to be used as tools were provided once during the study. The chimpanzees predominantly excavated the buried fruits manually. They used one hand to excavate soil and used both hands, alternating right and left, to excavate clay. The chimpanzees rarely used tools to excavate regular soil, while more often used tools to excavate naturally compacted soil (below the depth where the fruits were placed) and clay. In general, tool-use increased with the hardness of the soil type. The chimpanzees were selective in their choice of materials to be used as tools, preferring long and heavy sticks from trees. Even though they were observed to manufacture tools in other contexts, they were never seeing to make tools for the excavation of underground food. Only one instance of tool modification occurred. The chimpanzees gathered their own tools from the enclosure: these tools were similar in physical characteristics and material to the ones they selected from the provided materials. Some tools remained in the study area and were reused in different days. The tools that were reused more frequently were transported more. In the beginning of the study, tools were only used as investigatory probes. But later, the chimpanzees succeeded in using tools for excavation by incorporating different actions: perforate, pound, dig, shovel, and enlarge. Some individuals seemed to acquire the actions through their own trial and error, while others seemed to learn through observation of skilled individuals. It was found that excavation was not a single action, but a series of different actions all performed (manually or with tools) with the goal of extracting the underground food. Tool actions emerged sequentially and independently in the two study groups: probe, perforate, pound, dig, and shovel. Mastering one action seemed to facilitate the invention of the following action. The implications of the present study for the behavior of wild chimpanzees are discussed
    corecore