Two distinct repressive mechanisms for histone 3 lysine 4 methylation through promoting 3'-end antisense transcription

International audienceHistone H3 di- and trimethylation on lysine 4 are major chromatin marks that correlate with active transcription. The influence of these modifications on transcription itself is, however, poorly understood. We have investigated the roles of H3K4 methylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by determining genome-wide expression-profiles of mutants in the Set1 complex, COMPASS, that lays down these marks. Loss of H3K4 trimethylation has virtually no effect on steady-state or dynamically-changing mRNA levels. Combined loss of H3K4 tri- and dimethylation results in steady-state mRNA upregulation and delays in the repression kinetics of specific groups of genes. COMPASS-repressed genes have distinct H3K4 methylation patterns, with enrichment of H3K4me3 at the 3'-end, indicating that repression is coupled to 3'-end antisense transcription. Further analyses reveal that repression is mediated by H3K4me3-dependent 3'-end antisense transcription in two ways. For a small group of genes including PHO84, repression is mediated by a previously reported trans-effect that requires the antisense transcript itself. For the majority of COMPASS-repressed genes, however, it is the process of 3'-end antisense transcription itself that is the important factor for repression. Strand-specific qPCR analyses of various mutants indicate that this more prevalent mechanism of COMPASS-mediated repression requires H3K4me3-dependent 3'-end antisense transcription to lay down H3K4me2, which seems to serve as the actual repressive mark. Removal of the 3'-end antisense promoter also results in derepression of sense transcription and renders sense transcription insensitive to the additional loss of SET1. The derepression observed in COMPASS mutants is mimicked by reduction of global histone H3 and H4 levels, suggesting that the H3K4me2 repressive effect is linked to establishment of a repressive chromatin structure. These results indicate that in S. cerevisiae, the non-redundant role of H3K4 methylation by Set1 is repression, achieved through promotion of 3'-end antisense transcription to achieve specific rather than global effects through two distinct mechanisms

Recrutement de l'hélicase Pif1 par la protéine de réplication RPA durant la réplication et aux cassures double-brin de l'ADN : Etude fonctionnelle de l'Histone méthyltransférase Set1 dans la régulation de la taille des télomères chez Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Différents rôles de l'hélicase Pif1 ont été décrit dont le plus documenté est de décrocher la télomérase des télomères en déroulant les hybrides ARN/ADN formés entre l'ARN de la télomérase et l'ADN télomérique. Plus récemment, une nouvelle voie de signalisation des dommages à l'ADN a été mise en évidence, qui inhibe l'action de la télomérase au niveau d'une cassure de l'ADN via la phosphorylation de l'hélicase Pif1. Cette phosphorylation, dépendante de la kinase ATR (Mec1), inhibe la réparation aberrante de la cassure d'ADN par la télomérase. Nous étudions au sein de l’équipe la protéine RPA (Replication Protein A), affine de l'ADN simple-brin, qui recrute à la fois la protéine de recombinaison homologue Rad52 et la protéine Mec1 impliquée dans la cascade de signalisation des dommages de l'ADN. Lors de l'étude de différentes fonctions de l'hélicase Pif1, j'ai mis en évidence une interaction robuste entre Pif1 et RPA. J'ai identifié un allèle de RFA1, rfa1-D228Y, affectant l'interaction Pif1/RPA et montré, grâce à cet allèle, que cette interaction est impliquée dans le recrutement de Pif1 au niveau d'une cassure double-brins (CDB) induite de l'ADN. Enfin, il a été récemment mis en évidence un nouveau rôle de Pif1 dans la stabilité des G-Quadruplexes durant la réplication du brin avancé. En effet, les cellules pif1 présentent un taux d'instabilité du minisatellite CEB1 inséré sur le brin avancé d'environ 56%, correspondant à des réarrangements de l'ADN de type contractions ou expansions. Lors de l'étude de l'interaction Pif1/RPA, j'ai montré que la mutation rfa1-D228Y entraîne une instabilité du minisatellite CEB1 présent sur le brin avancé, similaire à celle observée avec la délétion pif1∆. Nous suggérons un modèle selon lequel RPA recruterait Pif1 au cours de différents processus cellulaires tels que la réponse des dommages à l'ADN ou la réplication des structures particulières de l'ADN telles que les G-Quadruplexes.En parallèle de cette étude, j’ai étudié le rôle de l'histone méthyltransférase Set1 spécifique de la lysine 4 de l'histone H3 dans la régulation de la taille des télomères. J’ai mis en évidence que le raccourcissement des télomères observé dans un mutant set1 est lié à l'absence de di- et tri-méthylation de H3K4 alors que la perte de monométhylation n'a aucun effet. Cependant, le défaut de la taille des télomères dans les cellules set1∆ n'est pas uniquement lié au défaut de méthylation de H3K4 mais semble impliquer une autre activité de Set1 qu’il reste à déterminer. Etonnamment, nous avons observé que la délétion de SET1 aggrave le raccourcissement des télomères des mutants dont les gènes sont impliqués dans la régulation positive de la taille des télomères et inversement, aggrave le rallongement des télomères de mutants dont les gènes sont impliqués dans la régulation négative des télomères. Nous postulons que l’inactivation de Set1 pourrait à la fois inhiber l’activation précoce des origines de réplication des régions subtélomériques et conduire à un sur-raccourcissement de la taille des télomères, à la fois affecter la synthèse du brin complémentaire dans un contexte où celle-ci est affectée (mutant rif1) et conduire à un sur-allongement des télomères. Une seconde hypothèse propose que Set1 régulerait la transcription deTERRA dans des cellules ayant les télomères déprotégés (mutant rif) entraînant le sur-allongement des télomères.Different roles of Pif1 helicase have been described, the best documented being to remove telomerase from telomeres by unwinding the RNA/DNA hybrid between telomerase RNA and telomeric DNA. Recently, it was shown that the DNA damage signaling down-regulates telomerase action at a DNA break via Pif1 phosphorylation. Pif1 phosphorylation is dependent of the checkpoint kinase ATR (Mec1) and prevents the aberrant healing of broken DNA ends by telomerase. In our laboratory, we study RPA (Replication Protein A), a single-strand DNA binding protein which recruits the proteins involved in the DNA damage response and checkpoint regulation, such as the homologous recombination protein Rad52 and Mec1 involved in the DNA damage response. I have identified an allele of RFA1, rfa1-D228Y, that affects the Pif1/RPA interaction and showed using this allele that this interaction is implicated in the Pif1 recruitment at an induced double-strand break. Recently, a new role of Pif1 in the stability of G-quadruplex DNA during the leading strand replication has been described. pif1 cells show an instability about 56% of the human minisatellite CEB1 inserted on the leading strand. During my study of the Pif1/RPA interaction, I showed that the rfa1-D228Y mutant induced a similar instability of CEB1 minisatellite on the leading strand. We suggested that RPA would recruit Pif1 for many cellular processes such as DNA damage response or replication of secondary DNA structures such as G-Quadruplexes.In parallel, I have studied the role of the Set1 Histone methyltransferase which catalyse the methylation of the lysine 4 of histone H3, in the regulation of telomere length. I showed that the telomere shortening observed in set1 mutant is due to the loss of di- and tri-methylation of H3K4 while the loss of monomethylation has no effect. However, the short telomeres in set1∆ cells is not only due to the methylation defect shedding light on a new Set1 activity that remains to be fully characterized.. The SET1 deletion aggravates the telomere shortening of mutants which genes are involved in positive regulation of telomere length and conversely, aggravates the lengthening of mutants which genes are involved in negative regulation of telomere length. We postulated that inactivation of Set1 could affect at once activation of early-replication origins and leads to a telomere shortening, and affect synthesis of complementary strand in a context where this one is affected (mutant rif1) and leads to a telomere lengthening. A second hypothesis propose that Set1 would regulate TERRA transcription in cells with deprotected-telomere (rif mutant) leading to the lengthening of telomeres

Solving the Telomere Replication Problem

Telomeres are complex nucleoprotein structures that protect the extremities of linear chromosomes. Telomere replication is a major challenge because many obstacles to the progression of the replication fork are concentrated at the ends of the chromosomes. This is known as the telomere replication problem. In this article, different and new aspects of telomere replication, that can threaten the integrity of telomeres, will be reviewed. In particular, we will focus on the functions of shelterin and the replisome for the preservation of telomere integrit

STEEx, a boundary between the world of quiescence and the vegetative cycle

Telomere maintenance mechanism is poorly studied in quiescence, a reversible non-proliferative state. We previously described in fission yeast a new mode of repair of telomeres named STEEx, that specifically operates in post-mitotic cells harboring eroded telomeres. This mechanism, promoted by transcription-induced telomeric recombination, prevents cells to exit properly from quiescence, suggesting that STEEx act as an anti-proliferative barrier. Here, we further showed that STEEx are genetically controlled by the Tel1(ATM)- and Rad3(ATR)- dependent DDR pathways. We discussed the possibility that STEEx represent a boundary between quiescence and vegetative cycle

Meiotic recombination is confirmed to be unusually high in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

In most eukaryotes, meiotic crossovers (COs) are limited to 1–3 per chromosome, and are prevented from occurring close to one another by CO interference. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe,an exception to these general rules, was reported to have the highest CO number per chromosome and no or weak interference. However, global CO frequency was indirectly estimated, calling for confirmation. Here, we used an innovative strategy to determine COs genome-wide in S. pombe. We confirmed weak CO interference, acting at physical distances compatible with the patterning of recombination precursors. We revealed a slight co-variation in CO number between chromosomes, suggesting that a limiting pro-CO factor varies between meiocytes. CO number per chromosome varies proportionally with chromosome size, with the three chromosomes having, on average, 15.9, 12.5, and 7.0 COs, respectively. This reinforces S. pombe’s status as the eukaryote with the highest CO number per chromosome described to date

Eroded telomeres are rearranged in quiescent fission yeast cells through duplications of subtelomeric sequences

How both telomere stability is regulated and dysfunctional telomeres processed in quiescent cells is poorly understood. Here, the authors provide evidence that eroded telomeres in quiescent fission yeast are rearranged by homologous recombination through duplications of subtelomeric sequences

RPA and Pif1 cooperate to remove G-rich structures at both leading and lagging strand

International audienceIn Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the absence of Pif1 helicase induces the instability of G4-containing CEB1 minisatellite during leading strand but not lagging strand replication. We report that RPA and Pif1 cooperate to maintain CEB1 stability when the G4 forming strand is either on the leading or lagging strand templates. At the leading strand, RPA acts in the same pathway as Pif1 to maintain CEB1 stability. Consistent with this result, RPA co-precipitates with Pif1. This association between Pif1 and RPA is affected by the rfa1-D228Y mutation that lowers the affinity of RPA in particular for G-rich single-stranded DNA. At the lagging strand, in contrast to pif1∆, the rfa1-D228Y mutation strongly increases the frequency of CEB1 rearrangements. We explain that Pif1 is dispensable at the lagging strand DNA by the ability of RPA by itself to prevent formation of stable G-rich secondary structures during lagging strand synthesis. Remarkably, overexpression of Pif1 rescues the instability of CEB1 at the lagging strand in the rfa1-D228Y mutant indicating that Pif1 can also act at the lagging strand. We show that the effects of the rfa1-D228Y (rpa1-D223Y in fission yeast) are conserved in Schiz-osaccharomyces pombe. Finally, we report that RNase H1 interacts in a DNA-dependent manner with RPA in budding yeast, however overexpression of RNase H1 does not rescue CEB1 instability observed in pif1∆ and rfa1-D228Y mutants. Collectively these results add new insights about the general role of RPA in preventing formation of DNA secondary structures and in coordinating the action of factors aimed at resolving them

RPA and Pif1 cooperate to remove G-rich structures at both leading and lagging strand

International audienceIn Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the absence of Pif1 helicase induces the instability of G4-containing CEB1 minisatellite during leading strand but not lagging strand replication. We report that RPA and Pif1 cooperate to maintain CEB1 stability when the G4 forming strand is either on the leading or lagging strand templates. At the leading strand, RPA acts in the same pathway as Pif1 to maintain CEB1 stability. Consistent with this result, RPA co-precipitates with Pif1. This association between Pif1 and RPA is affected by the rfa1-D228Y mutation that lowers the affinity of RPA in particular for G-rich single-stranded DNA. At the lagging strand, in contrast to pif1∆, the rfa1-D228Y mutation strongly increases the frequency of CEB1 rearrangements. We explain that Pif1 is dispensable at the lagging strand DNA by the ability of RPA by itself to prevent formation of stable G-rich secondary structures during lagging strand synthesis. Remarkably, overexpression of Pif1 rescues the instability of CEB1 at the lagging strand in the rfa1-D228Y mutant indicating that Pif1 can also act at the lagging strand. We show that the effects of the rfa1-D228Y (rpa1-D223Y in fission yeast) are conserved in Schiz-osaccharomyces pombe. Finally, we report that RNase H1 interacts in a DNA-dependent manner with RPA in budding yeast, however overexpression of RNase H1 does not rescue CEB1 instability observed in pif1∆ and rfa1-D228Y mutants. Collectively these results add new insights about the general role of RPA in preventing formation of DNA secondary structures and in coordinating the action of factors aimed at resolving them