Vaccination with Fendrix of prior nonresponding patients with HIV has a high success rate

Background: Patients with HIV have a poor serological conversion rate with the standard vaccination strategy against hepatitis B virus (HBV) of around 50%. Vaccination with Fendrix confers much better results in these patients. In this study, we tested the effect of revaccination with Fendrix in prior nonresponding patients with HIV and aimed to determine which factors are associated with seroconversion. Methods: Eight Dutch HIV treatment centers participated in this retrospective study. Patients infected with HIV-1 and nonresponding to prior course of vaccination against HBV (anti-HBs <10 IU/ml) and who had Fendrix as a second, third or fourth effort to achieve seroconversion were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with seroconversion after revaccination with Fendrix. Univariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to determine which factors could be used as predictors for seroconversions. Results: We included 100 patients with HIV. The mean age was 47.3 (11.0) years and 86% were men. Revaccination with Fendrix showed a seroconversion rate of 81% (95% confidence interval 72–88%). Median nadir CD4þ cell count was 300 (20–1040) cells/ ml and median CD4þ cell count at the time at starting vaccination with Fendrix was 605 (210–1190) cells/ml. Regression analyses showed no significant factor associated with seroconversion. Conclusions: Revaccination with Fendrix of patients prior nonresponding to other hepatitis B vaccination strategies has a high success rate. Eighty-one percentage responded with seroconversion, irrespective of CD4þ cell count

[Chloroquine for COVID-19: a hype or not?]

In March the CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, posted a Tweet about the possible effects of chloroquine for COVID-19. Celebrities and mainstream media joined the discussion and promoted (hydroxy-)chloroquine to a true hype and the miracle cure for COVID-19. Police surveillance was needed to protect the producer of chloroquine in the Netherlands. Was (hydroxy-)chloroquine just a hype? The first European study had many methodological issues, a misleading conclusion and was published without the peer review process. It took several weeks before better designed studies showed that (hydroxy-)chloroquine was not effective for COVID-19, after which the use of this medicine was no longer recommended. It is understandable that in a pandemic there is a high need for an effective cure, but physicians should have waited until effectiveness was demonstrated. In our opinion, the use of (hydroxy-)chloroquine for COVID-19 was indeed a hype

A rare tongue ulcer in a renal transplant recipient

Contains fulltext : 225247.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

[Myelitis transversa caused by neuroschistosomiasis]

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Neuroschistosomiasis is a severe complication of an infection with Schistosoma; this infection can lead to myelitis transversa. Acute myelitis transversa is a rare disorder of the spinal cord, which can present with muscular weakness, sensory disturbance and intestinal or bladder dysfunction. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 17-year-old refugee from Eritrea, who had been in the Netherlands for 3 weeks, suffered from back pain and progressive weakness of both legs for one week. Both the clinical presentation and the MRI images were consistent with myelitis transversa. Schistosomamansoni eggs were found in the faeces, and antibodies to Schistosoma eggs and worms were found in both liquor and serum, leading to a diagnosis of neuroschistosomiasis. The patient recovered completely following treatment with praziquantel and prednisone. CONCLUSION: Schistosomiasis is a commonly occurring parasitic disease in sub-Saharan Africa, which can lead to myelitis transversa if it spreads to the spinal cord. Early detection and treatment are necessary to prevent lasting damage. A good geographical case history is essential for this process

Impact of the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel on patient care and infection control

Contains fulltext : 218876.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)OBJECTIVES: Conventional routine PCR testing for gastrointestinal infections is generally based on pathogen related panels specifically requested by clinicians and can be erroneous and time consuming. The BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal (GI) panel combines 22 pathogens into a single cartridge-based test on a random-access system, thereby reducing the turnaround time to less than 2 hours. We described the clinical impact of implementing the BioFire FilmArray on patients with gastroenteritis in our hospital. METHODS: Patients attending a Dutch tertiary care center (Radboud University Medical Center), from whom stool samples were obtained, were eligible for inclusion. The clinicians selected one or a combination of different routinely performed PCR panels (bacterial panel, viral panel, clostridium testing, and three parasitic panels) based on clinical history and symptoms. All samples were in parallel tested with the FilmArray. We retrospectively collected patient data regarding infection control and patient management to assess the potential impact of implementing the FilmArray. RESULTS: In total 182 patients were included. Routine PCR detected one or more pathogens in 52 (28.6%) patients compared to 72 (39.6%) using the FilmArray. Turnaround time (including transport) decreased from median 53 hours for the routine PCR to 16 hours for the FilmArray. Twenty-six patients could have been removed from isolation 29 hours sooner, 3.6 antibiotic days could have been saved and in five patients additional imaging testing (including colonoscopies) could have been prevented. CONCLUSION: The theoretical implementation of the BioFire FilmArray GI panel in patients with clinical suspicion of gastroenteritis resulted in a significant better patient management

Reply to Gautret et al: hydroxychloroquine sulfate and azithromycin for COVID-19: what is the evidence and what are the risks?

The severity of COVID-19 has resulted in a global rush to find the right antiviral treatment to conquer the pandemic and to treat patients. This requires reliable studies to support treatment. In a recently published study by Gautret et al. the authors concluded that hydroxychloroquine monotherapy and hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycin reduced viral load. However, this trial has several major methodological issues, including the design, outcome measure and the statistical analyses. In this paper we discuss the background, clinical evidence, pharmacology and methodological issues related to this clinical trial. We understand the rush to release results, however in case conclusions are far reaching the evidence needs to be robust

Quality of Life With Pembrolizumab for Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KEYNOTE-040

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL); few treatments have demonstrated clinically meaningful HRQoL benefit. KEYNOTE-040 evaluated pembrolizumab versus standard of care (SOC) in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC whose disease recurred/progressed after platinum-containing regimen. METHODS: Patients received pembrolizumab 200\u2009mg or SOC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). Exploratory HRQoL analyses used European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30 quality-of-life, EORTC 35-question quality-of-life head and neck cancer-specific module, and EuroQoL 5-dimensions questionnaires. RESULTS: HRQoL population comprised 469 patients (pembrolizumab=241, SOC=228). HRQoL compliance for patients on study at week 15 was 75.3% (116/154) for pembrolizumab and 74.6% (85/114) for SOC. Median time to deterioration in global health status (GHS)/QoL score was 4.8 months and 2.8 months, respectively (HR, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.05). At week 15, GHS/QoL scores were stable for pembrolizumab (least squares mean [LSM], 0.39; 95% CI: -3.00, 3.78) but worsened for SOC (LSM, -5.86; 95% CI: -9.68, -2.04); LSM between-group difference was 6.25 points (95% CI: 1.32, 11.18; nominal 2-sided P=.01). Greater difference in LSM score for GHS/QoL occurred with pembrolizumab versus docetaxel (10.23; 95% CI: 3.15, 17.30) compared with pembrolizumab versus methotrexate (6.21; 95% CI: -4.57, 16.99) or pembrolizumab versus cetuximab (-1.44; 95% CI: -11.43, 8.56). Pembrolizumab-treated patients had stable functioning and symptoms at week 15, with no notable differences from SOC. CONCLUSIONS: GHS/QoL was stable with pembrolizumab but declined with SOC in patients at week 15, supporting the clinically meaningful benefit of pembrolizumab in R/M HNSCC