56 research outputs found
To What Extent can the Activities of the South Australian Health in All Policies Initiative be Linked to Population Health Outcomes Using a Program Theory-Based Evaluation
This paper reports on a five-year study using a theory-based program logic evaluation, and supportingsurvey and interview data to examine the extent to which the activites of the South Australian Health in All Policiesinitiative can be linked to population health outcomes
Freedom from Violence: Tools for Working with Trauma, Mental Health and Substance Use: Resource Tool Kit
First paragraph: The aim of this tool kit is to actively engage readers in applying a feminist analysis to women's experiences of mental health, substance use and past and current experiences of violence. The tool kit contains a wide variety of voices that speak to these issues by drawing on a range of sources: the experience of providing services to women, theory, research, feminist activism and scholarship and, naturally, by the writers' own experiences of substance use, mental health problems and violence
Health Impact Assessment in New South Wales & Health in All Policies in South Australia: differences, similarities and connections
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article,
unless otherwise stated.Background:
Policy decisions made within all sectors have the potential to influence population health and equity.
Recognition of this provides impetus for the health sector to engage with other sectors to facilitate the
development of policies that recognise, and aim to improve, population outcomes. This paper compares the
approaches implemented to facilitate such engagement in two Australian jurisdictions. These are Health Impact
Assessment (HIA) in New South Wales (NSW) and Health in All Policies (HiAP) in South Australia (SA).
Methods:
The comparisons presented in this paper emerged through collaborative activities between stakeholders
in both jurisdictions, including critical reflection on HIA and HiAP practice, joint participation in a workshop, and the
preparation of a discussion paper written to inform a conference plenary session. The plenary provided an
opportunity for the incorporation of additional insights from policy practitioners and academics.
Results:
Comparison of the approaches indicates that their overall intent is similar. Differences exist, however, in
the underpinning principles, technical processes and tactical strategies applied. These differences appear to stem
mainly from the organisational positioning of the work in each state and the extent to which each approach is
linked to government systems.
Conclusions:
The alignment of the HiAP approach with the systems of the SA Government increases the likelihood
of influence within the policy cycle. However, the political priorities and sensitivities of the SA Government limit the
scope of HiAP work. The implementation of the HIA approach from outside government in NSW means greater
freedom to collaborate with a range of partners and to assess policy issues in any area, regardless of government
priorities. However, the comparative distance of HIA from NSW Government systems may reduce the potential for
impact on government policy. The diversity in the technical and tactical strategies that are applied within each
approach provides insight into how the approaches have been tailored to suit the particular contexts in which they
have been implemented.
Keywords:
Health in all policies, Health impact assessment, Healthy public polic
Establishing an agenda for social studies research in marine renewable energy
Peer reviewedPublisher PD
Health in All Policies in South Australia-Did It Promote and Enact an Equity Perspective?
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Mobilising cross-sectoral action is helpful in addressing the range of social determinants that contribute to health inequities. The South Australian Health in All Policies (SA HiAP) approach was implemented from 2007 to stimulate cross-sector policy activity to address the social determinants of health to improve population wellbeing and reduce health inequities. This paper presents selected findings from a five year multi-methods research study of the SA HiAP approach and draws on data collected during interviews, observation, case studies, and document analysis. The analysis shows that SA HiAP had dual goals of facilitating joined-up government for co-benefits (process focus); and addressing social determinants of health and inequities through cross-sectoral policy activity (outcomes focus). Government agencies readily understood HiAP as providing tools for improving the process of intersectoral policy development, while the more distal outcome-focused intent of improving equity was not well understood and gained less traction. While some early rhetorical support existed for progressing an equity agenda through SA HiAP, subsequent economic pressures resulted in the government narrowing its priorities to economic goals. The paper concludes that SA HiAPâs initial intentions to address equity were only partially enacted and little was done to reduce inequities. Emerging opportunities in SA, and internationally, including the UN Sustainable Development Goals, may revive interest in addressing equity
Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia
Abstract
Background: The importance of evaluating policy processes to achieve health equity is well recognised but such
evaluation encounters methodological, theoretical and political challenges. This paper describes how a program theorybased evaluation framework can be developed and tested, using the example of an evaluation of the South Australian
Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative.
Methods: A framework of the theorised components and relationships of the HiAP initiative was produced to guide
evaluation. The framework was the product of a collaborative, iterative process underpinned by a policy-research
partnership and drew on social and political science theory and relevant policy literature.
Results: The process engaged key stakeholders to capture both HiAP specific and broader bureaucratic knowledge and
was informed by a number of social and political science theories. The framework provides a basis for exploring the
interactions between framework components and how they shape policy-making and public policy. It also enables an
assessment of HiAPâs success in integrating health and equity considerations in policies, thereby laying a foundation for
predicting the impacts of resulting policies.
Conclusion: The use of a program theory-based evaluation framework developed through a consultative process
and informed by social and political science theory has accommodated the complexity of public policy-making. The
framework allows for examination of HiAP processes and impacts, and for the tracking of contribution towards distal
outcomes through the explicit articulation of the underpinning program theory
The Zero Emissions Commitment and climate stabilization
How do we halt global warming? Reaching net zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is understood to be a key milestone on the path to a safer planet. But how confident are we that when we stop carbon emissions, we also stop global warming? The Zero Emissions Commitment (ZEC) quantifies how much warming or cooling we can expect following a complete cessation of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. To date, the best estimate by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report is zero change, though with substantial uncertainty. In this article, we present an overview of the changes expected in major Earth system processes after net zero and their potential impact on global surface temperature, providing an outlook toward building a more confident assessment of ZEC in the decades to come. We propose a structure to guide research into ZEC and associated changes in the climate, separating the impacts expected over decades, centuries, and millennia. As we look ahead at the century billed to mark the end of net anthropogenic CO2 emissions, we ask: what is the prospect of a stable climate in a post-net zero world
The effects of poverty on school education â research from the Poverty and Education Network
No abstract available
- âŠ