14 research outputs found

    Analyse et optimisation des performances de la technique VMAT pour son utilisation en radiothérapie

    Get PDF
    La technique de radiothérapie VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy), diffusée en 2009, combine les avantages des techniques d'arc thérapie dynamique aux avantages des techniques de radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité (RCMI) par faisceaux stationnaires. L'objectif de la thèse est de rendre optimales les conditions de mise en œuvre du VMAT autour d'un accélérateur linéaire d'électrons Synergy/Elekta afin de sécuriser la technique et de pouvoir bénéficier de l'apport clinique potentiellement attendu. Sur la base d'une analyse de l'influence des différents paramètres de la chaîne de traitement, nous proposons des éléments d'optimisation du traitement à la fois sur la planification dosimétrique et sur le contrôle de son exécution sur la machine. Nous montrons que si la qualité de l'optimisation de la technique dépend des caractéristiques intrinsèques de l'accélérateur, elle est également fortement influencée par le paramétrage du système de planification des traitements (TPS). Nous mettons en évidence des différences comparées des collimateurs Beam Modulateur (largeur de lames de 4 mm) et MLCi2 (largeur de lames de 10 mm) tant sur le plan de la distribution de dose obtenue que sur l'efficience. Nous montrons que, si pour deux principaux TPS commercialisés (Pinnacle/Philips et Monaco/Elekta) les distributions de dose aux volumes cibles sont peu modifiées, les différences de méthodes implémentées influencent la distribution de dose aux tissus sains. Nous proposons des programmes de contrôles de qualité au niveau de l'accélérateur, des plans dosimétriques de traitement et de l'exécution des traitements. Afin de garantir un niveau de confiance élevé sur la dose délivrée, nous proposons une méthode d'évaluation de la fluence délivrée en cours de traitement basée sur l'analyse des paramètres machines. Nous établissons que le processus de traitement VMAT optimisé fournit des performances de qualité supérieure que les techniques de RCMI par faisceaux stationnaires pour quatre localisations tumorales majeures étudiées.VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) technique has been introduced in 2009, it combines advantage of arctherapy techniques with advantage of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radio Therapy) techniques delivered with stationary beams. The purpose of the thesis is to optimise implementation conditions of VMAT for a Synergy/Elekta linear accelerator in order to secure the technique and to be able to benefit from potentially expected clinical improvement. From analysis of influence of various work flow parameters, we propose treatment optimisation factors both on dosimetric planning and on delivering control on the accelerator. We show that if optimisation quality depends on intrinsic accelerator characteristics, it also depends very much on configuration of treatment planning system (TPS). We highlight compared differences between Beam Modulateur (leaf width of 4 mm) and MLCi2 (leaf width of 10 mm) on dose distribution and on efficiency. We show that if differences of dose distributions are small for two major TPS (Pinnacle/Philips and Monao/Elekta), the differences of implemented methods affect dose distribution of healthy tissues. We suggest quality control set for accelerators, for treatment plans and for treatment delivery. In order to provide a high safety level on delivered dose, we suggest an evaluation method of the real fluence provided during treatment delivery by analysing accelerator parameters. We establish that optimised process of VMAT treatment provides better performance than RCMI techniques delivered with stationary beams for the four major cancer cases that has been studied.RENNES1-Bibl. électronique (352382106) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Quantification of the volumetric benefit of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in prostate cancer: margins and presence probability map

    No full text
    International audiencePURPOSE: To quantify the prostate and seminal vesicles (SV) anatomic variations in order to choose appropriate margins including intrapelvic anatomic variations. To quantify volumetric benefit of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients, receiving a total dose of 70 Gy in the prostate, had a planning CT scan and eight weekly CT scans during treatment. Prostate and SV were manually contoured. Each weekly CT scan was registered to the planning CT scan according to three modalities: radiopaque skin marks, pelvis bone or prostate. For each patient, prostate and SV displacements were quantified. 3D maps of prostate and SV presence probability were established. Volumes including minimal presence probabilities were compared between the three modalities of registration. RESULTS: For the prostate intrapelvic displacements, systematic and random variations and maximal displacements for the entire population were: 5mm, 2.7 mm and 16.5mm in anteroposterior axis; 2.7 mm, 2.4mm and 11.4mm in superoinferior axis and 0.5mm, 0.8mm and 3.3mm laterally. Margins according to van Herk recipe (to cover the prostate for 90% of the patients with the 95% isodose) were: 8mm, 8.3mm and 1.9 mm, respectively. The 100% prostate presence probability volumes correspond to 37%, 50% and 61% according to the registration modality. For the SV, these volumes correspond to 8%, 14% and 18% of the SV volume. CONCLUSIONS: Without IGRT, 5mm prostate posterior margins are insufficient and should be at least 8mm, to account for intrapelvic anatomic variations. Prostate registration almost doubles the 100% presence probability volume compared to skin registration. Deformation of SV will require either to increase dramatically margins (simple) or new planning (not realistic)

    Salivary gland-sparing other than parotid-sparing in definitive head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy does not seem to jeopardize local control.

    Get PDF
    International audienceBACKGROUND: The objective was to analyze locoregional (LR) failure patterns in patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC) treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with whole salivary gland-sparing: parotid (PG), submandibular (SMG), and accessory salivary glands represented by the oral cavity (OC). METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients with Stage I-II (23%) or III/IV (77%) HNC treated by definitive IMRT were included. For all LR failure patients, the FDG-PET and CT scans documenting recurrence were rigidly registered to the initial treatment planning CT. Failure volumes (Vf) were delineated based on clinical, radiological, and histological data. The percentage of Vf covered by 95% of the prescription isodose (Vf-V95) was analyzed. Failures were classified as "in-field" if Vf--V95 >= 95%, "marginal" if 20% < Vf-V95 < 95%, and "out-of-field" if Vf-V95 <=20%. Correlation between Vf-V95 and mean doses (Dmean) in the PG, SMG, and OC was assessed using Spearman's rank-order correlation test. The salivary gland dose impact on the LR recurrence risk was assessed by Cox analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 20 months (6--35). Contralateral and ipsilateral PGs were spared in 98% and 54% of patients, respectively, and contralateral and ipsilateral SMG in 26% and 7%, respectively. The OC was spared to a dose <=40 Gy in 26 patients (37%). The 2-year LR control rate was 76.5%. One recurrence was "marginal", and 12 were "in-field". No recurrence was observed in vicinity of spared structures. Vf-V95 was not significantly correlated with Dmean in PG, SMG, and OC. The LR recurrence risk was not increased by lower Dmean in the salivary glands, but by T (p = 0.04) and N stages (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Over 92% of LR failures occurred "in-field" within the high dose region when using IMRT with a whole salivary gland-sparing strategy. Sparing SMG and OC in addition to PG thus appears a safe strategy

    Monte Carlo simulation for imaging dose estimation: application to the Elekta XVI kV-CBCT

    Get PDF
    International audiencePurpose/Objective: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is progressively more used in clinical practice to ensure precision in target localization and patient positioning required by new radiotherapy treatment techniques. However, intensive use of image guidance procedures could add a significant extra dose to normal tissues and potentially amplify the risk for patients to develop radiation-induced cancer. Therefore, there is an increasing interest to evaluate the dose delivered by CBCT scans. The most accurate tool to evaluate this imaging dose is the Monte Carlo (MC) method. To this end, this study aims at developing a MC-based dose calculation tool to compute the imaging dose, and to validateit in pre-clinical conditions against dosimetric measurements
    corecore