Üliõpilaste sotsiaalmajanduslik uuring 2005/2006

Eesti üliõpilaskonna uuringu kokkuvõte.Selleks, et otsustada, mida Eesti üliõpilane tahab ja vajab, on oluline teada nende tänast olukorda, rahulolu sellega ning nende homseid ootusi ja lootusi. Nende kaante vahelt leiad nii mõndagi head ja huvitavat, nii ammu teada olnut kui ka uut, mõtlemapanevat ja muret tekitavat. Käesolev uuring keskendub üliõpilaste sotsiaalmajanduslikule olukorrale ning on järjekorras juba teine omasugune, mida Eesti Üliõpilaskondade Liidu tellimusel (edaspidi: EÜL) on läbi viidud. Seekord olid partneritena uuringusse kaasatud ka Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi (ESF) poolt toetatava projekti „Ülikoolilõpetajate konkurentsivõime tõstmine läbi õppetegevuse kvaliteedi arenduse” kolm alaprojekti ning Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium

The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination

Under what conditions do critical events trigger large-scale public discussion and mobilisation, and can these lead to policy change? In a comparative study of nuclear energy policy after the Japanese Fukushima disaster in March 2011, a theory-development approach is adopted, mobilising data collected from national news agencies’ newswires, public surveys, legislation and parliamentary databases, and newspaper editorials in 12 established democracies between March 2011 and March 2013. The analysis suggests two main hypotheses that can guide future research: critical events are more likely to trigger policy change when intense (contentious) mobilisation from policy challengers aligns with the views of the general public, and is backed by major political allies; and critical events are more likely to trigger intense (contentious) mobilisation when policy challengers articulate their opposition around pre-existing policy debates on the issue and resort to pre-existing organisational and mobilisation resources

The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination

Under what conditions do critical events trigger large-scale public discussion and mobilisation, and can these lead to policy change? In a comparative study of nuclear energy policy after the Japanese Fukushima disaster in March 2011, a theory-development approach is adopted, mobilising data collected from national news agencies’ newswires, public surveys, legislation and parliamentary databases, and newspaper editorials in 12 established democracies between March 2011 and March 2013. The analysis suggests two main hypotheses that can guide future research: critical events are more likely to trigger policy change when intense (contentious) mobilisation from policy challengers aligns with the views of the general public, and is backed by major political allies; and critical events are more likely to trigger intense (contentious) mobilisation when policy challengers articulate their opposition around pre-existing policy debates on the issue and resort to pre-existing organisational and mobilisation resources

ResponsiveGov's Codebook and Appendices

Codebook and Appendices of the ResponsiveGov projec