3 research outputs found

    New iterative method to obtain the softening curve in concrete.

    Get PDF
    Abstract An original procedure to determine the softening curve in concrete has been proposed by the authors. This inverse method combines experimental results, finite element simulations and an iterative algorithm to adjust the experimental data. The end product of the process is a softening curve that allows us to very accurately reproduce the experimental curves. The proposed method calculates the fracture energy from the cohesive softening curve model, which in turn is iteratively determined by adjusting experimental load-displacement data of three-point bending tests. The procedure has been successfully applied to two conventional concretes

    Revisiting the method to obtain the mechanical properties of hydrided fuel cladding in the hoop direction

    Full text link
    The method reported in the literature to calculate the stress–strain curve of nuclear fuel cladding from ring tensile test is revisited in this paper and a new alternative is presented. In the former method, two universal curves are introduced under the assumption of small strain. In this paper it is shown that these curves are not universal, but material-dependent if geometric nonlinearity is taken into account. The new method is valid beyond small strains, takes geometric nonlinearity into consideration and does not need universal curves. The stress–strain curves in the hoop direction are determined by combining numerical calculations with experimental results in a convergent loop. To this end, ring tensile tests were performed in unirradiated hydrogen-charged samples. The agreement among the simulations and the experimental results is excellent for the range of concentrations tested (up to 2000 wppm hydrogen). The calculated stress–strain curves show that the mechanical properties do not depend strongly on the hydrogen concentration, and that no noticeable strain hardening occurs. However, ductility decreases with the hydrogen concentration, especially beyond 500 wppm hydrogen. The fractographic results indicate that as-received samples fail in a ductile fashion, whereas quasicleavage is bserved in the hydrogen-charged samples

    A zero CO2 emissions large ship fuelled by an ammonia-hydrogen blend: Reaching the decarbonisation goals.

    Get PDF
    [EN]To reach the decarbonisation goals, a zero CO2 emissions large ship propulsion system is proposed in this work. The ship selected is a large ferry propelled by an internal combustion engine fuelled by an ammonia-hydrogen blend. The only fuel loaded in the vessel will be ammonia. The hydrogen required for the combustion in the engine will be produced onboard employing ammonia decomposition. The heat required for this decomposition section will be supplied by using the hot flue gases of the combustion engine. To address the issues regarding NOx emissions, a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) reactor was designed. The main operating variables for all the equipment were computed for engine load values of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. Considering the lowest SCR removal rate (91% at an engine load of 100%), the NOx emissions of the vessel were less than 0.5 g/kWh, lower than the IMO requirements. An energy analysis of the system proposed to transform ammonia into energy for shipping was conducted. The global energy and exergy efficiencies were 42.4% and 48.1%. In addition, an economic analysis of the system was performed. The total capital cost (CAPEX) for the system can be estimated at 8.66 M€ (784 €/kW) while the operating cost (OPEX) ranges between 210 €/MWh (engine load 100%) and 243 €/MWh (engine load of 25%). Finally, a sensitivity analysis for the price of ammonia was performed resulting in the feasibility of reducing the operating cost to below 150 €/MWh in the near horizon.This work was supported by the Regional Government of Castilla y León (Junta de Castilla y León) and by the Ministry of Science and Innovation MICIN and the European Union NextGenerationEU / PRTR (H2MetAmo project - C17.I01.P01.S21)
    corecore