Problems Affecting Labor

Much experimental work has been devoted in comparing the folding behavior of proteins sharing the same fold but different sequence. The recent design of proteins displaying very high sequence identities but different 3D structure allows the unique opportunity to address the protein-folding problem from a complementary perspective. Here we explored by ℙ-value analysis the pathways of folding of three different heteromorphic pairs, displaying increasingly high-sequence identity (namely, 30%, 77%, and 88%), but different structures called G A (a 3-α helix fold) and G B (an α/β fold). The analysis, based on 132 site-directed mutants, is fully consistent with the idea that protein topology is committed very early along the pathway of folding. Furthermore, data reveals that when folding approaches a perfect two-state scenario, as in the case of the G A domains, the structural features of the transition state appear very robust to changes in sequence composition. On the other hand, when folding is more complex and multistate, as for the G Bs, there are alternative nuclei or accessible pathways that can be alternatively stabilized by altering the primary structure. The implications of our results in the light of previous work on the folding of different members belonging to the same protein family are discussed

Long-term effects of monocular deprivation revealed with binocular rivalry gratings modulated in luminance and in color

During development, within a specific temporal window called the critical period, the mammalian visual cortex is highly plastic and literally shaped by visual experience; to what extent this extraordinary plasticity is retained in the adult brain is still a debated issue. We tested the residual plastic potential of the adult visual cortex for both achromatic and chromatic vision by measuring binocular rivalry in adult humans following 150 minutes of monocular patching. Paradoxically, monocular deprivation resulted in lengthening of the mean phase duration of both luminance-modulated and equiluminant stimuli for the deprived eye and complementary shortening of nondeprived phase durations, suggesting an initial homeostatic compensation for the lack of information following monocular deprivation. When equiluminant gratings were tested, the effect was measurable for at least 180 minutes after reexposure to binocular vision, compared with 90 minutes for achromatic gratings. Our results suggest that chromatic vision shows a high degree of plasticity, retaining the effect for a duration (180 minutes) longer than that of the deprivation period (150 minutes) and twice as long as that found with achromatic gratings. The results are in line with evidence showing a higher vulnerability of the P pathway to the effects of visual deprivation during development and a slower development of chromatic vision in humans. Introductio

Visual motion distorts visual and motor space

Much evidence suggests that visual motion can cause severe distortions in the perception of spatial position. In this study, we show that visual motion also distorts saccadic eye movements. Landing positions of saccades performed to objects presented in the vicinity of visual motion were biased in the direction of motion. The targeting errors for both saccades and perceptual reports were maximum during motion onset and were of very similar magnitude under the two conditions. These results suggest that visual motion affects a representation of spatial position, or spatial map, in a similar fashion for visuomotor action as for perception

Perception during double-step saccades

How the visual system achieves perceptual stability across saccadic eye movements is a long-standing question in neuroscience. It has been proposed that an efference copy informs vision about upcoming saccades, and this might lead to shifting spatial coordinates and suppressing image motion. Here we ask whether these two aspects of visual stability are interdependent or may be dissociated under special conditions. We study a memory-guided double-step saccade task, where two saccades are executed in quick succession. Previous studies have led to the hypothesis that in this paradigm the two saccades are planned in parallel, with a single efference copy signal generated at the start of the double-step sequence, i.e. before the first saccade. In line with this hypothesis, we find that visual stability is impaired during the second saccade, which is consistent with (accurate) efference copy information being unavailable during the second saccade. However, we find that saccadic suppression is normal during the second saccade. Thus, the second saccade of a double-step sequence instantiates a dissociation between visual stability and saccadic suppression: stability is impaired even though suppression is strong

Spatiotopic selectivity of adaptation-based compression of event duration

n/

Perceptual Oscillations in Gender Classification of Faces, Contingent on Stimulus History

Perception is a proactive ‘‘predictive’’ process, in which the brain takes advantage of past experience to make informed guesses about the world to test against sensory data. Here we demonstrate that in the judgment of the gender of faces, beta rhythms play an important role in communicating perceptual experience. Observers classified in forced choice as male or female, a sequence of face stimuli, which were physically constructed to be male or female or androgynous (equal morph). Classification of the androgynous stimuli oscillated rhythmically between male and female, following a complex waveform comprising 13.5 and 17 Hz. Parsing the trials based on the preceding stimulus showed that responses to androgynous stimuli preceded by male stimuli oscillated reliably at 17 Hz, whereas those preceded by female stimuli oscillated at 13.5 Hz. These results suggest that perceptual priors for face perception from recent perceptual memory are communicated through frequency-coded beta rhythms

spatiotemporal filtering and motion illusions

We are perplexed by Clarke et al.'s (2013) criticisms on our recent contribution to Journal of Vision (Pooresmaeili, Cicchini, Morrone, & Burr, 2012). Our group has long championed the idea that perceptual processing of information can be anchored in a dynamic coordinate system that need not correspond to the instantaneous retinal representation. Our recent evidence shows that temporal duration (Burr, Tozzi, & Morrone, 2007; Morrone, Cicchini, & Burr, 2010), orientation (Zimmermann, Morrone, Fink, & Burr, 2013), motion (Melcher & Morrone, 2003; Turi & Burr, 2012) and saccadic error-correction (Zimmermann, Burr, & Morrone, 2011) are all processed to some extent in spatiotopic coordinates. Imaging studies reinforce these studies (d'Avossa et al., 2007; Crespi et al., 2011). Much earlier, we showed that the processing of smoothly moving objects was not anchored in instantaneous, retinotopic coordinates, but in the reference frame given by the trajectory of motion. There is an effective interpolation along the trajectory, so temporal offsets in spatially collinear stimuli causes them to appear spatially offset, corresponding to the physical reality of stimuli moving over large regions of space, behind occluders (Burr, 1979; Burr & Ross, 1979). Our explanation for this surprising effect was that it could be a direct consequence of the spatiotemporal orientation of the impulsive response of motion detectors, providing the spatiotemporal reference frame needed to account for the interactions between time and space (Burr & Ross, 1986; Burr, Ross, & Morrone, 1986; Burr & Ross, 2004; Nishida, 2004). Recently, we have applied the concept of spatiotemporal oriented receptive fields to account for ''predictive remapping,'' the ''nonretinotopic'' effects that occur on each saccadic eye-movement (Burr & Morrone, 2010; Burr & Morrone, 2012; Cicchini, Binda, Burr, & Morrone, 2012). We were most impressed by the compelling demonstrations of Herzog's group, clearly showing that the reference frame of processing is not the instantaneous retinal position, but is flexible, depending not only on real physical motion, but on an illusory apparent motion where the stimuli do not actually move (Boi, Ogmen, Krummenacher, Otto, & Herzog, 2009). This seemed to us important, worthy of quantitative measurement and modeling, particularly to see whether these new effects may fall within the framework that so successfully explained previous demonstrations, such as spatiotemporal interpolation. It is reassuring that Clarke et al. (2013) confirm our results, albeit with some variability between subjects. But more importantly add a very nice result in showing that our simplified version of the ''litmus test'' can be enhanced by attending to the motion. This is an excellent point that we overlooked. The strength of this type of motion is well known to depend on attention (Cavanagh, 1992), and it is indeed interesting that the strength of motion-induced effects depends not only on the physical conditions, but on internal states such as attention. Perhaps attention may also provide the flexibility in choosing the most appropriate scale for analysis, which in this case would be lower, given that attention is diverted to the periphery. This would add strength to our model, and an idea worth following up

Using psychophysical performance to predict short-term ocular dominance plasticity in human adults

Binocular rivalry has become an important index of visual performance, both to measure ocular dominance or its plasticity, and to index bistable perception. We investigated its interindividual variability across 50 normal adults and found that the duration of dominance phases in rivalry is linked with the duration of dominance phases in another bistable phenomenon (structure from motion). Surprisingly, it also correlates with the strength of center-surround interactions (indexed by the tilt illusion), suggesting a common mechanism supporting both competitive interactions: center-surround and rivalry. In a subset of 34 participants, we further investigated the variability of short-term ocular dominance plasticity, measured with binocular rivalry before and after 2 hours of monocular deprivation. We found that ocular dominance shifts in favor of the deprived eye and that a large portion of ocular dominance variability after deprivation can be predicted from the dynamics of binocular rivalry before deprivation. The single best predictor is the proportion of mixed percepts (phases without dominance of either eye) before deprivation, which is positively related to ocular dominance unbalance after deprivation. Another predictor is the duration of dominance phases, which interacts with mixed percepts to explain nearly 50% of variance in ocular dominance unbalance after deprivation. A similar predictive power is achieved by substituting binocular rivalry dominance phase durations with tilt illusion magnitude, or structure from motion phase durations. Thus, we speculate that ocular dominance plasticity is modulated by two types of signals, estimated from psychophysical performance before deprivation, namely, interocular inhibition (promoting binocular fusion, hence mixed percepts) and inhibition for perceptual competition (promoting longer dominance phases and stronger center-surround interactions)

Large receptive fields for optic flow detection in humans

AbstractWe used a psychophysical summation technique to study the properties of detectors tuned to radial, circular and translational motion, and to determine the spatial extent of their receptive fields. Signal-to-noise motion thresholds were measured for patterns curtailed spatially in various ways. Sensitivity for radial, circular and translational motion increased with stimulus area at a rate predicted by an ideal integrator. When sectors of noise were added to the stimulus, sensitivity decreased at a rate consistent with an ideal integrator. Summation was tested for large annular stimuli, and shown to hold up to 70° in some cases, suggesting very large receptive fields for this type of motion (consistent with the physiology of neurones in the dorsal region of the medial superior temporal area (MSTd)). This is a far greater area than observed for summation of contrast sensitivity to gratings (Anderson SJ and Burr DC, Vis Res 1987;29:621–635, and to this type of stimuli (Morrone MC, Burr DC and Vaina LM, Nature 1995;376:507–509, consistent with the suggestion that the two techniques examine different levels of motion analysis