Implementation of nutritional guidelines in a university hospital monitored by repeated point prevalence surveys

Background/Objectives: Malnutrition is present in 20–50% of hospitalized patients, and nutritional care is a challenge. The aim was to evaluate whether the implementation of a nutritional strategy would influence nutritional care performance in a university hospital. Subjects/Methods: This was a prospective quality improvement program implementing guidelines for nutritional care, with the aim of improving nutritional practice. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 was used. Point prevalence surveys over 2 years to determine whether nutritional practice had improved. Results: In total, 3604 (70%) of 5183 eligible patients were screened and 1230 (34%) were at nutritional risk. Only 53% of the at-risk patients got nutritional treatment and 5% were seen by a dietician. The proportion of patients screened increased from the first to the eighth point prevalence survey (P=0.012), but not the proportion of patients treated (P=0.66). The four initial screening questions in NRS 2002 identified 92% of the patients not at nutritional risk. Conclusions: Implementation of nutritional guidelines improved the screening performance, but did not increase the proportion of patients who received nutritional treatment. Point prevalence surveys were useful to evaluate nutritional practice in this university hospital. In order to improve practice, we suggest using only the four initial screening questions in NRS 2002 to identify patients not at risk, better education in nutritional care for physicians and nurses, and more dieticians employed. Audit of implementation of guidelines, performed by health authorities, and specific reimbursement for managing nutrition may also improve practice.publishedVersio

A randomized clinical trial of an intervention to relieve thirst and dry mouth in intensive care unit patients

PURPOSE: To test an intervention bundle for thirst intensity, thirst distress, and dry mouth, which are among the most pervasive, intense, distressful, unrecognized, and under-treated symptoms in ICU patients, but for which data-based interventions are lacking. METHODS: Single-blinded, randomized clinical trial in three ICUs in a tertiary medical center in urban California. 252 cognitively intact patients reporting thirst intensity (TI) and/or thirst distress (TD) scores ≥ 3 on 0–10 numeric rating scales (NRS) were randomized to Intervention or Usual Care groups. A Research Team Nurse (RTN#1) obtained patients’ pre-procedure TI and TD scores and reports of dry mouth. She then administered a thirst bundle to the Intervention group: oral swab wipes, sterile ice cold water sprays, and a lip moisturizer, or observed patients in the Usual Care group. RTN#2, blinded to group assignment, obtained post-procedure TI and TD scores. Up to 6 sessions per patient were conducted across two days. RESULTS: Multilevel linear regression determined that the average decreases in TI and TD scores from pre-procedure to post-procedure were significantly greater in the Intervention group (2.3 and 1.8 NRS points, respectively) versus the Usual Care group (0.6 and 0.4 points, respectively) (p < 0.05). The Usual Care group was 1.9 times more likely than the Intervention group to report dry mouth for each additional session on Day 1. CONCLUSION: This simple, inexpensive thirst bundle significantly decreased ICU patients’ thirst and dry mouth and can be considered a practice intervention for patients experiencing thirst. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicalTrials.gov (NCT01015755)