Statin Use and the Presence of Microalbuminuria. Results from the ERICABEL Trial: A Non-Interventional Epidemiological Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Microalbuminuria (MAU) is considered as a predictor or marker of cardiovascular and renal events. Statins are widely prescribed to reduce cardiovascular risk and to slow down progression of kidney disease. But statins may also generate tubular MAU. The current observational study evaluated the impact of statin use on the interpretation of MAU as a predictor or marker of cardiovascular or renal disease. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used cross-sectional data of ERICABEL, a cohort with 1,076 hypertensive patients. MAU was defined as albuminuria ≥20 mg/l. A propensity score was created to correct for "bias by indication" to receive a statin. As expected, subjects using statins vs. no statins had more cardiovascular risk factors, pointing to bias by indication. Statin users were more likely to have MAU (OR: 2.01, 95%CI: 1.34-3.01). The association between statin use and MAU remained significant after adjusting for the propensity to receive a statin based on cardiovascular risk factors (OR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.14-2.91). Next to statin use, only diabetes (OR: 1.92, 95%CI: 1.00-3.66) and smoking (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 0.99-2.26) were associated with MAU. CONCLUSIONS: Use of statins is independently associated with MAU, even after adjusting for bias by indication to receive a statin. In the hypothesis that this MAU is of tubular origin, statin use can result in incorrect labeling of subjects as having a predictor or marker of cardiovascular or renal risk. In addition, statin use affected the association of established cardiovascular risk factors with MAU, blurring the interpretation of multivariable analyses

A Review of Time Courses and Predictors of Lipid Changes with Fenofibric Acid-Statin Combination

Fibrates activate peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α and exert beneficial effects on triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein subspecies. Fenofibric acid (FA) has been studied in a large number of patients with mixed dyslipidemia, combined with a low- or moderate-dose statin. The combination of FA with simvastatin, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin resulted in greater improvement of the overall lipid profile compared with the corresponding statin dose. The long-term efficacy of FA combined with low- or moderate- dose statin has been demonstrated in a wide range of patients, including patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, or elderly subjects. The FA and statin combination seems to be a reasonable option to further reduce cardiovascular risk in high-risk populations, although trials examining cardiovascular disease events are missing

Clinical relevance of central blood pressure - a critical review.

Vital organs are exposed to the central rather than the brachial blood pressure. To date, central blood pressure can be assessed noninvasively through the use of several devices. In this review, we critically discuss the clinical relevance of central blood pressure assessment. Considerable evidence suggests that central blood pressure is a better predictor of end-organ damage than brachial blood pressure. However, there is still uncertainty concerning the value of central pressure for predicting cardiovascular outcomes, as the existing studies are underpowered to address this issue. A full synthesis of the available data is needed in this regard. Among the different antihypertensive drug classes, beta-blockers appear to lower central blood pressure less than brachial blood pressure. This difference may, at least in part, explain the reduced efficacy of beta-blockers in the prevention of cardiovascular outcomes compared with the other antihypertensive drug classes, which may lower central and brachial blood pressure to a similar extent. Nevertheless, this differential effect might not be relevant to the newer beta-blockers with vasodilating properties, including nebivolol, celliprolol and carvedilol. However, whether a preferential reduction of central blood pressure results in better outcomes should be further assessed by appropriately powered clinical trials. Other emerging challenges include the assessment of the potential predictive value of central blood pressure variability and the development of new antihypertensive medications based on central blood pressure rather than brachial blood pressure

Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin Treatment on Admission Improves 5-Year Survival After a First-ever Acute Ischemic Stroke. Data from the Athens Stroke Outcome Project

Background and Aims: We undertook this study to compare the impact of aspirin vs. clopidogrel treatment on 5-year survival of patients experiencing a first-ever acute ischemic noncardioembolic stroke. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving patients with an acute ischemic stroke who had an indication for antiplatelet therapy (atherothrombotic, lacunar and cryptogenic stroke subtype). A total of 1228 (383 women) hospitalized due to an acute first-ever stroke and receiving aspirin (n = 880) or clopidogrel (n = 348) were finally involved. To determine the factors that independently predict 5-year survival statistical analysis including the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and multifactorial analysis (Cox regression) was performed. Results: Subjects treated with clopidogrel had improved 5-year survival compared with those receiving aspirin (log rank test: 16.4, p <0.0001). The difference in survival was evident as early as 6 months from index stroke: cumulative survival 93.8% for aspirin vs. 97% for clopidogrel (log rank test: 4.01, p = 0.045). The composite cardiovascular event (including stroke recurrence, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, aortic aneurysm rupture, peripheral atherosclerotic artery diseases, and sudden death) rates were lower in the clopidogrel group (n = 60, 17.2%) compared with the aspirin (n = 249, 28.3%) group (log rank test: 12.4, p <0.0001). This preferential effect of clopidogrel over aspirin was independent of age, gender, presence of cardiovascular disease other than stroke or cardiovascular risk factors as well as irrespective of the severity of stroke and days of hospitalization. Conclusions: This study supports that clopidogrel is superior to aspirin in preventing death and cardiovascular events after an acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. © 2011 IMSS