31,442 research outputs found

    Drawing Parallels between Heuristics and Dynamic Programming

    Get PDF

    Does Central Bank Intervention Increase the Volatility of Foreign Exchange Rates?

    Get PDF
    Since the abandonment of the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates in the early 1970s, exchange rates have displayed a surprisingly high degree of time-conditional volatility. This volatility can be explained statistically using autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models, but there remains the question of the economic source of this volatility. Central bank intervention policy may provide part of the explanation. Previous work has shown that central banks have relied heavily on intervention policy to influence the level of exchange rates, and that these operations have, at times, been effective. This paper investigates whether central bank interventions have also influenced the variance of exchange rates. The results from daily and weekly GARCH models of the /DMand/DM and /Yen rates over the period 1985 to 1991 indicate that publicly known Fed intervention generally decreased volatility over the full period. Further, results indicate that intervention need not be publicly known for it to influence the conditional variance of exchange rate changes. Secret intervention operations by both the Fed and the Bundesbank generally increased exchange rates volatility over the period.

    Corrections to the SU(3)×SU(3){\bf SU(3)\times SU(3)} Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation and chiral couplings L8rL^r_8 and H2rH^r_2

    Get PDF
    Next to leading order corrections to the SU(3)×SU(3)SU(3) \times SU(3) Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation (GMOR) are obtained using weighted QCD Finite Energy Sum Rules (FESR) involving the pseudoscalar current correlator. Two types of integration kernels in the FESR are used to suppress the contribution of the kaon radial excitations to the hadronic spectral function, one with local and the other with global constraints. The result for the pseudoscalar current correlator at zero momentum is ψ5(0)=(2.8±0.3)×103GeV4\psi_5(0) = (2.8 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-3} GeV^{4}, leading to the chiral corrections to GMOR: δK=(55±5)\delta_K = (55 \pm 5)%. The resulting uncertainties are mostly due to variations in the upper limit of integration in the FESR, within the stability regions, and to a much lesser extent due to the uncertainties in the strong coupling and the strange quark mass. Higher order quark mass corrections, vacuum condensates, and the hadronic resonance sector play a negligible role in this determination. These results confirm an independent determination from chiral perturbation theory giving also very large corrections, i.e. roughly an order of magnitude larger than the corresponding corrections in chiral SU(2)×SU(2)SU(2) \times SU(2). Combining these results with our previous determination of the corrections to GMOR in chiral SU(2)×SU(2)SU(2) \times SU(2), δπ\delta_\pi, we are able to determine two low energy constants of chiral perturbation theory, i.e. L8r=(1.0±0.3)×103L^r_8 = (1.0 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-3}, and H2r=(4.7±0.6)×103H^r_2 = - (4.7 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-3}, both at the scale of the ρ\rho-meson mass.Comment: Revised version with minor correction

    When Do Central Bank Interventions Influence Intra-Daily and Longer-Term Exchange Rate Movements?

    Get PDF
    This paper examines dollar interventions by the G3 since 1989, and the reasons that trader reactions to these interventions might differ over time and across central banks. Market microstructure theory provides a framework for understanding the process by which sterilized central bank interventions are observed and interpreted by traders, and how this process in turn, might influence exchange rates. Using intra-daily and daily exchange-rate and intervention data, the paper analyzes the influence of interventions on exchange-rate volatility, finding evidence of both within day and daily impact effects, but little evidence that interventions influence longer term volatility.central bank intervention, exchange rate volatility, market-microstructure

    Vector Meson Dominance and gρππg_{\rho\pi\pi} at Finite Temperature from QCD Sum Rules

    Full text link
    A Finite Energy QCD sum rule at non-zero temperature is used to determine the q2q^2- and the T-dependence of the ρππ\rho \pi \pi vertex function in the space-like region. A comparison with an independent QCD determination of the electromagnetic pion form factor FπF_{\pi} at T0T \neq 0 indicates that Vector Meson Dominance holds to a very good approximation at finite temperature. At the same time, analytical evidence for deconfinement is obtained from the result that gρππ(q2,T)g_{\rho \pi \pi}(q^{2},T) vanishes at the critical temperature TcT_c, independently of q2q^{2}. Also, by extrapolating the ρππ\rho \pi \pi form factor to q2=0q^2 = 0, it is found that the pion radius increases with increasing TT, and it diverges at T=TcT=T_c.Comment: 7 pages, Latex, 3 figures to be delivered from the authors by request, to appear in Phys. Lett.

    QCD determination of the axial-vector coupling of the nucleon at finite temperature

    Full text link
    A thermal QCD Finite Energy Sum Rule (FESR) is used to obtain the temperature dependence of the axial-vector coupling of the nucleon, gA(T)g_{A}(T). We find that gA(T)g_{A}(T) is essentially independent of TT, in the very wide range 0T0.9Tc0 \leq T \leq 0.9 T_{c}, where TcT_{c} is the critical temperature. While gAg_{A} at T=0 is q2q^{2}-independent, it develops a q2q^{2} dependence at finite temperature. We then obtain the mean square radius associated with gAg_{A} and find that it diverges at T=TcT=T_{c}, thus signalling quark deconfinement. As a byproduct, we study the temperature dependence of the Goldberger-Treiman relation.Comment: 8 pages and 3 figure

    Multipolar expansion of the electrostatic interaction between charged colloids at interfaces

    Full text link
    The general form of the electrostatic potential around an arbitrarily charged colloid at an interface between a dielectric and a screening phase (such as air and water, respectively) is analyzed in terms of a multipole expansion. The leading term is isotropic in the interfacial plane and varies with d3d^{-3} where dd is the in--plane distance from the colloid. The electrostatic interaction potential between two arbitrarily charged colloids is likewise isotropic and d3\propto d^{-3}, corresponding to the dipole--dipole interaction first found for point charges at water interfaces. Anisotropic interaction terms arise only for higher powers dnd^{-n} with n4n \ge 4.Comment: 6 pages, mathematical details adde
    corecore