The rights of indigenous peoples - comments on expert mechanism draft study

This presentation was given as part of the Expert Seminar on Indigenous Cultures and Languages in collaboration with the UN by Professor Marie-Benedicte Dembour from the University of Sussex. The seminar, hosted at Brunel University, took place on the 8th and 9th March 2012 and was organised by Brunel Law School's Human Rights Research Centre. The initiative, fronted by Dr Alexandra Xanthaki of Brunel Law School, represents a positive example of how academia, the civil society and the international community can come together with vulnerable groups to help the regain their rights

Toward International Animal Rights

The chapter starts from the observation that while animal welfare is increasingly protected in domestic jurisdictions, animal rights are still hardly recognised, although they would serve animals better. It argues that animal rights would need to be universalised in order to deploy effects in a globalised setting. The international legal order is flexible and receptive to non-human personhood which goes with rights. Also, the historical experience with international human rights encourages the animal rights project, because it shows how similar conceptual and normative difficulties have been overcome. Animal rights would complement human rights not the least because the entrenchment of the species hierarchy as manifest in the denial of animal rights in the extreme case condones disrespect for the rights of humans themselves

Troubling the exclusive privileges of citizenship: mobile solidarities, asylum seekers, and the right to work

This article discusses asylum seekers and the right to work in the UK. Differential access to the labour market is one of the ways in which the state maintains a distinction between British citizens, who ‘belong’, and non-citizens who do not. While such a policy approach garners widespread support amongst the general public of citizens, it does not go uncontested. This article discusses a UK-based campaign, ‘Let Them Work’, which has sought to influence the government in extending the right to work to asylum seekers. In doing so, it demonstrates the ways in which the stratified regime of citizenship rights is contested politically, and explores how such contestation troubles the exclusive privileges of citizenship by enacting mobile solidarities from marginalised spaces

How 'universal' is the United Nations' Universal Periodic Review process? An examination of the discussions held on polygamy

In 2006, United Nations Human Rights Council was tasked to establish a new human rights monitoring mechanism: Universal Periodic Review process. The primary aim of this process is to promote and protect the universality of all human rights issues and concerns via a dialogical peer review process. The aim of this investigation isto ask the following question: has this claim of promoting and protecting the universality of the human rights been met, or challenged, during state reviews in the UPR process? The issue of polygamy has been selected as the focus for this investigation to be used, primarily, as a tool to undertake an in-depth analysis of the discussions held during state reviews in the review process. In addition, this paper will employ scholarly debates between universalism and cultural relativism, as well as the sophisticated and nuanced approaches that fall in between the polarised opposites, to analyse the discussions held on human rights during state reviews. Ultimately, the findings and discussion of this investigation will provide a unique and valuable insight to the work and operation of the UPR process, so far

The memory of colonialism Meetings with former Colonial Officers of the Belgian Congo

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre- DSC:D179150 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

The House of Ghosts: Post-socialist Property Restitution and the European Court’s Rendition of Human Rights in ‘Brumarescu v. Romania’

Brumarescu v. Romania, decided in 1999, was the first case where the European Court of Human Rights found an ex-socialist state in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights in relation to claims arising in respect of a residential property expropriated during socialism. Our contribution, based on conversations with the applicant and other protagonists in the case, reveals the multiple spectres both from the past and from current concerns which feed into the relationship which various social actors entertain towards the property at the centre of the dispute (locally known as the 'house of ghosts') or, rather, towards each other and society at large. The chapter also shows how Strasbourg, which became a symbolic resource in local and national politics, actually failed to provide any closure either to the dispute which gave rise to the continuous litigation or to the issue of property restitution in Romania more generally. This leads the authors to explore possible purposes of human rights law beyond straightforward recognition of a natural right’s entitlement, in terms of participation to the reinforcement of the rule of law and assertion of protest in the face of humiliation and spoliation

The house of ghosts: post-socialist restitution and the European court's rendition of human rights in Brumarescu v Romania

No description supplie