26 research outputs found

    Does time pressure impair performance? An experiment on queueing behavior

    Get PDF
    Conte A, Scarsini M, Sürücü O. Does time pressure impair performance? An experiment on queueing behavior. Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers. Vol 538. Bielefeld: Center for Mathematical Economics; 2015.We experimentally explore the effects of time pressure on decision making. Under different time allowance conditions, subjects are presented with a queueing situation and asked to join one of two queues that differ in length, server speed, and entry fee. The results can be grouped under two main categories. The first one concerns the factors driving customers' decisions in a queueing system. Only a proportion of subjects behave rationally and use the relevant information efficiently. The rest of the subjects seem to adopt a rule of thumb that ignores the information on server speed and follows the shorter queue. The second category is related to the effects of time pressure on decision performance. A significant proportion of the population is not affected by time limitations and shows a consistent behavior throughout the treatments. On the other hand, the majority of subjects' performance is impaired by time limitations. More importantly, this impairment is not due to the stringency of the limitation but mainly due to the fact that being exposed to a time limitation, even to a loose one, brings along stress and panic, and causes subjects to use time inefficiently

    Fast Thought Speed Induces Risk Taking

    No full text

    Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.

    No full text
    The first step of a friction ridge examination involves determining the suitability-or value-of an impression. Often, this is interpreted as whether the impression is suitable for comparison. However, examiners tend to be variable in their suitability determinations, and suitability itself can be a multi-faceted decision, comprising suitability for comparison, suitability for exclusion, suitability for identification, suitability for AFIS entry, complexity, and others. We undertook a white box study to explore the different facets of suitability determinations and to measure the specific categories of information upon which examiners most heavily rely when reaching these decisions. Although minutiae count was the best indicator of a value determination, clarity and distortion were better predictors of complexity determinations. Examiners were found to be highly variable in their determinations, as well as in their annotations of what information they relied upon. Some unanimous decisions were reached for only high-quality impressions; there was never unanimity on "no value" determinations. Examiners tended to use high-confidence minutiae markers, even when there was connective ambiguity or low clarity. Several new suitability categorizations were introduced and had good usage from study participants, indicating that they might have some value for inclusion in routine casework

    Oral health and healthcare utilization in Belgian dentate adults.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: In 2012-2014, the Belgian National Oral Health Data Registration and Evaluation Survey, integrated in the Health Interview Survey (HIS), was carried out. The present study investigated, in a sample of 1340 dentate adults (≥25 years), the association between oral healthcare utilization, oral health status and sociodemographic status. METHODS: A multistage, stratified cluster sampling procedure was used. Oral examination for caries experience (World Health Organization, D3 MFT-Index), periodontal status (Dutch Periodontal Screening Index, DPS-Index), number of teeth present and occlusal contacts without wearing removable dentures was performed by calibrated examiners. Oral healthcare utilization data were retrieved from the records of the Belgian Intermutualistic Agency. Participants' oral health and sociodemographic data were linked to registered oral care utilization in the previous 5-year period. Regular attenders (annual attenders and those with at least one registered contact in three different years) were compared with irregular attenders (those having had dental visits but not according to the definition of regular attenders) and nonattenders. Data were weighted to compensate for sampling and participation bias. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-nine participants attended regularly, of whom 276 annually; 256 did not attend in the reference period. The overall D3 MFT-Index was not noticeably different between attendance patterns (varying between 11 and 13), although regular attenders had more restored teeth than nonattenders (P 0.05). Females, participants with higher education, older participants and those in employment had higher rates of regular attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Regular attenders had fewer untreated caries lesions, but neither lower caries experience nor lower DPS-Index than irregular attenders. Regular attendance was associated with sociodemographic variables
    corecore