11 research outputs found

    Possible earthquake trigger for 6th century mass wasting deposit at Lake Ohrid (Macedonia/Albania)

    Get PDF
    Lake Ohrid shared by the Republics of Albania and Macedonia is formed by a tectonically active graben within the south Balkans and suggested to be the oldest lake in Europe. Several studies have shown that the lake provides a valuable record of climatic and environmental changes and a distal tephrostratigraphic record of volcanic eruptions from Italy. Fault structures identified in seismic data demonstrate that sediments have also the potential to record tectonic activity in the region. Here, we provide an example of linking seismic and sedimentological information with tectonic activity and historical documents. Historical documents indicate that a major earthquake destroyed the city of Lychnidus (today: city of Ohrid) in the early 6th century AD. Multichannel seismic profiles, parametric sediment echosounder profiles, and a 10.08m long sediment record from the western part of the lake indicate a 2m thick mass wasting deposit, which is tentatively correlated with this earthquake. The mass wasting deposit is chronologically well constrained, as it directly overlays the AD472/AD 512 tephra. Moreover, radiocarbon dates and cross correlation with other sediment sequences with similar geochemical characteristics of the Holocene indicate that the mass wasting event took place prior to the onset of the Medieval Warm Period, and is attributed it to one of the known earthquakes in the region in the early 6th century AD

    Body mass Index does not impact long-term survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplantation

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveWe investigated the impact of body mass index (BMI) on post-operative outcomes and survival of patients with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergoing lung transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 222 patients with IPF that underwent lung transplant (LT) at our institution from 2005 to 2019. Recipients were divided in 4 groups: group-1 consisted of underweight patients (BMI ≤18.5 kg/m2), group-2 of normal weight patients (BMI 18.5–25 kg/m2), group-3 of over-weight patients (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2) and group-4 of obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m2).ResultsGroup-1 consisted of 13 (6%) patients, group-2 of 67 (30%) patients, group-3 of 79 (36%) patients, group-4 consisted of 63 (28%) patients. Median BMI for group-1 was 17 [interquartile range (IQR): 17, 18], for group-2 was 23 (22, 24), for group-3 was 29 (28, 29.5) and group-4 was 32 (31, 33). Patients in group-1 were significantly younger (p < 0.01). Single LT comprised the majority of operation type in group-2 to group-4 and it was significantly higher than group 1 (p < 0.01). Median follow-up time was 39 months (13–76). A total of 79 (35.5%) patients died by the end of study. Overall, five deaths occurred in group-1, 17 in group-2, 33 in group-3, and 24 in group-4. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that mortality was not statistically significant between the groups (p = 0.24). Cox-regression analysis was used to assess other possible risk factors that could influence the effect of BMI on mortality, including transplant type (single, double), lung allocation score, and age, diabetes and creatinine levels at surgery. None of these factors were shown to affect patient mortality (p > 0.05). Overall reasons for death included graft failure (24%), infection (23%), respiratory failure (14%), and malignancy (13%).ConclusionsBody mass index does not impact long-term survival of patients with IPF undergoing lung transplantation

    The Gradience of Old Albanian Vowel Length

    No full text

    Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience

    No full text
    Background: Anastomotic leak (AL) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a well-described source of morbidity for patients undergoing surgical treatment of esophageal neoplasm. With improved early recognition and endoscopic management techniques, the long-term impact remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent MIE for esophageal neoplasm between January 2015 and June 2021 at a single institution. Cohorts were stratified by development of AL and subsequent management. Baseline demographics, perioperative data, and post-operative outcomes were examined. Results: During this period, 172 MIEs were performed, with 35 of 172 (20.3%) complicated by an AL. Perioperative factors independently associated with AL were post-operative blood transfusion (leak rate 52.9% versus 16.8%; p = 0.0017), incompleteness of anastomotic rings (75.0% vs 19.1%; p = 0.027), and receiving neoadjuvant therapy (18.5% vs 30.8%; p < 0.0001). Inferior short-term outcomes associated with AL included number of esophageal dilations in the first post-operative year (1.40 vs 0.46, p = 0.0397), discharge disposition to a location other than home (22.9% vs 8.8%, p = 0.012), length of hospital stay (17.7 days vs 9.6 days; p = 0.002), and time until jejunostomy tube removal (134 days vs 79 days; p = 0.0023). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with or without an AL at 1 year (79% vs 83%) or 5 years (50% vs 47%) (overall log rank p = 0.758). Conclusions: In this large single-center series of MIEs, AL was associated with inferior short-term outcomes including hospital length of stay, discharge disposition other than to home, and need for additional endoscopic procedures, without an accompanying impact on 1-year or 5-year survival. Key message: In this large, single-center series of minimally invasive esophagectomies, anastomotic leak was associated with worse short-term outcomes including hospital length of stay, discharge disposition other than to home, and need for additional endoscopic procedures, but was not associated with worse long-term survival. The significant association between neoadjuvant therapy and decreased leak rates is difficult to interpret, given the potential for confounding factors, thus careful attention to modifiable pre- and peri-operative patient factors associated with anastomotic leak is warranted
    corecore