13 research outputs found

    Evaluation of A Post-Treatment Follow-Up Program in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    Get PDF
    Objectives The duration and the frequency of follow-up after treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma are not standardized in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our local standard post-treatment and follow-up protocol. Materials and methods Overall, 228 patients treated curatively from 01/2006 to 07/2013 were reviewed. To evaluate the follow-up program, data on the secondary event were used. To determine risk groups, all patients with tumor recurrence were specifically analyzed. Relapse-free rate were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The chi-square test was used to identify independent risk factors for tumor relapse. Results In total, 29.8 % patients had a secondary event. The majority of the relapse cases (88.2 %) were detected within 2 years postoperatively, 61.8 % of them within the first year. Most events were local recurrences (34.7 %). UICC-stage IV was significantly associated with tumor recurrence (p = 0.001). Gender (p = 0.188), age (p = 0.195), localization (p = 0.739), T-stage (p = 0.35), N-stage (p = 0.55), histologic grade (p = 0.162), and tobacco and alcohol use (p = 0.248) were not significantly associated with tumor recurrence. Patients with positive neck nodes relapsed earlier (p = 0.011). The majority of relapses (86.3 %) were found in asymptomatic patients at routine follow-up. Conclusions The results of this study suggest an intensified follow-up within the first 2 years after surgery. Clinical relevance Given the higher relapse rate of patients exhibiting an UICC-stage IV and/or positive neck nodes, it seems to be from special interest to perform in this group a risk-adapted follow-up with monthly examinations also in the second year

    Assessment of the Calibration of Periodontal Diagnosis and Treatment Planning Among Dental Students at Three Dental Schools

    Get PDF
    Calibration in diagnosis and treatment planning is difficult to achieve due to variations that exist in clinical interpretation. To determine if dental faculty members are consistent in teaching how to diagnose and treat periodontal disease, variations among dental students can be evaluated. A previous study reported high variability in diagnoses and treatment plans of periodontal cases at Indiana University School of Dentistry. This study aimed to build on that one by extending the research to two additional schools: Marquette University School of Dentistry and West Virginia University School of Dentistry. Diagnosis and treatment planning by 40 third- and fourth-year dental students were assessed at each of the schools. Students were asked to select the diagnosis and treatment plans on a questionnaire pertaining to 11 cases. Their responses were compared using chi-square tests, and multirater kappa statistics were used to assess agreement between classes and between schools. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the effects of school, class year, prior experience, and GPA/class rank on correct responses. One case had a statistically significant difference in responses between third- and fourth-year dental students. Kappas for school agreement and class agreement were low. The students from Indiana University had higher diagnosis and treatment agreements than the Marquette University students, and the Marquette students fared better than the West Virginia University students. This study can help restructure future periodontal courses for a better understanding of periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning

    Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and metaâ analysis

    Full text link
    AimsThis review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at periâ implant sites and edentulous ridges.Material and MethodsElectronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A randomâ effects metaâ analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.ResultsOverall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was â 76.24% (95% CI = â 137.52% to â 14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at periâ implant sites was â 27.27% (95% CI of â 45.87% to â 8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.ConclusionBased on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For periâ implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142961/1/clr13121.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142961/2/clr13121_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142961/3/clr13121-sup-0003-checklist.pd

    Assessing readiness to manage medical emergencies among dental students at four dental schools

    Get PDF
    Background and Purpose Dentists treat a wide range of patients, including patients with compromised health conditions. While rendering treatment, various medical emergencies can and do occur. To help increase the knowledge required to manage such emergencies, dental students must be trained while in dental school. This study aims to assess the level of medical emergency preparedness and knowledge among dental students at four dental schools. Material and Methods The participating dental schools were IUSD, Case Western Reserve University School of Dentistry, Marquette University School of Dentistry, and the University of Alabama School of Dentistry. Groups were designed to include 20 dental students from Years 1 to 4. Students were asked to fill out a survey and were then tested on 10 clinical medical emergency scenarios. Results A total of 331 dental students participated in the study. The scores based on 10 case scenarios presented with a range of 4.35–8.02. There was no statistically significant difference in the level of preparedness when dental schools were compared. However, Year 1 and Year 2 dental students had significantly lower total scores than those of Years 3 and 4. The students in Years 1 and 2 demonstrated less confidence in their current knowledge to manage medical emergencies. Satisfaction with the training received ranged from 38% to 84%. Conclusion The results from this study indicate that students’ preparedness to manage medical emergencies at these four dental schools is statistically similar. Additional yearly training could enhance students’ preparedness in the management of medical emergencies in the dental setting

    Precision and Trueness of Implant Placement With and Without Static Surgical Guides: An in vitro Study

    No full text
    Statement of problem Malpositioning of implants is one of the main factors leading to hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies. Whether static computer-guided implant placement increases accuracy and prevents malpositioning is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine accuracy defined by trueness and precision (according to International Organization for Standardization 5725) of computer-assisted implant surgery (fully guided and partially guided) in comparison with freehand single implant placement. Material and methods Implants (n=20) were placed fully guided (sleeve-bone distance of 2, 4, or 6 mm), partially guided (guide used for pilot drill), or free hand in identical replicas produced from a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of a partially edentulous patient. The achieved implant position was digitized by using a laboratory scanner and compared with the planned position. Trueness (planned versus actual position) and precision (difference among implants) were determined. The 3D-offset at the crest of the implant (root mean square between virtual preoperative planning and postoperative standard tessellation language file) was defined as the primary outcome parameter. The means, standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals were analyzed statistically with 1-way ANOVA and the Scheffé procedure. Results Fully guided implant surgery achieved significantly lower 3D deviations between the planned and actual implant position with 0.22 ±0.07 mm (2-mm sleeve-bone distance) than partially guided 0.69 ±0.15 mm and freehand placement 0.80 ±0.35 mm at the crest (P\u3c.001). The distance among the implants in each group was again lowest in the fully guided group and highest in the freehand group. Conclusions The static computer-assisted implant surgery showed high trueness and precision. The closer the sleeve to the bone, the more accurate and precise the method. Freehand implant placement was less accurate and precise than computer-assisted implant surgery (partially or fully)

    Treatment of a Periodontic-Endodontic Lesion in a Patient with Aggressive Periodontitis

    Get PDF
    Case Description. This case report describes the successful management of a left mandibular first molar with a combined periodontic-endodontic lesion in a 35-year-old Caucasian woman with aggressive periodontitis using a concerted approach including endodontic treatment, periodontal therapy, and a periodontal regenerative procedure using an enamel matrix derivate. In spite of anticipated poor prognosis, the tooth lesion healed. This case report also discusses the rationale behind different treatment interventions. Practical Implication. Periodontic-endodontic lesions can be successfully treated if dental professionals follow a concerted treatment protocol that integrates endodontic and periodontic specialties. General dentists can be the gatekeepers in managing these cases
    corecore