Induction of auxin biosynthesis and WOX5 repression mediate changes in root development in Arabidopsis exposed to chitosan

[EN] Chitosan is a natural polymer with applications in agriculture, which causes plasma membrane permeabilisation and induction of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants. Chitosan has been mostly applied in the phylloplane to control plant diseases and to enhance plant defences, but has also been considered for controlling root pests. However, the effect of chitosan on roots is virtually unknown. In this work, we show that chitosan interfered with auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis roots, promoting a 2-3 fold accumulation of indole acetic acid (IAA). We observed chitosan dose-dependent alterations of auxin synthesis, transport and signalling in Arabidopsis roots. As a consequence, high doses of chitosan reduce WOX5 expression in the root apical meristem and arrest root growth. Chitosan also propitiates accumulation of salicylic (SA) and jasmonic (JA) acids in Arabidopsis roots by induction of genes involved in their biosynthesis and signalling. In addition, high-dose chitosan irrigation of tomato and barley plants also arrests root development. Tomato root apices treated with chitosan showed isodiametric cells respect to rectangular cells in the controls. We found that chitosan causes strong alterations in root cell morphology. Our results highlight the importance of considering chitosan dose during agronomical applications to the rhizosphere.This work was supported by AGL 2015 66833-R Grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Grant AGL 2015. We would like to thank Drs Isabel Lopez-Diaz and Esther Carrera for plant hormone quantitation (IBMCP, Valencia, Spain). Part of this work was filed for a patent (P201431399) by L. V. Lopez-Llorca, F. Lopez-Moya and N. Escudero as inventors. We would like to thank Dr Michael Kershaw (University of Exeter) for his English revision and critical comments of the manuscript. We also thank Ms Marta Suarez-Fernandez (University of Alicante) and Mr Alfonso Prieto for their technical support. All the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.Lopez-Moya, F.; Escudero, N.; Zavala-Gonzalez, EA.; Esteve-Bruna, D.; Blazquez Rodriguez, MA.; Alabadí Diego, D.; Lopez-Llorca, LV. (2017). Induction of auxin biosynthesis and WOX5 repression mediate changes in root development in Arabidopsis exposed to chitosan. Scientific Reports. 7:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16874-5S1147Savary, S., Ficke, A., Aubertot, J.-N. & Hollier, C. Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Sec. 4(4), 519–37 (2012).Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52(3), 273–88 (2005).El-Hadrami, A. & Adam, L. R. Hadrami El, I. & Daayf, F. Chitosan in plant protection. Mar. Drugs. 8(4), 968–987 (2010).Kumar, R. M. N. V. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React. Funct. Poly. 46(1), 1–27 (2000).Mayakrishnan, V., Kannappan, P., Abdullah, N. & Ali, A. A. B. Cardioprotective activity of polysaccharides derived from marine algae: an overview. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 30, 98–104 (2013).Lopez-Moya, F. et al. Carbon and nitrogen limitation increase chitosan antifungal activity in Neurospora crassa and fungal human pathogens. Fun. Biol. 119(2-3), 154–69 (2015).Benhamou, N. & Theriault, G. Treatment with chitosan enhances resistance of tomato plants to the crown and root rot pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Physiol Mol Plant Path. 44(1), 33–52 (1992).Ohta, K., Taniguchi, A., Konishi, N. & Hosoki, T. Chitosan treatment affects plant growth and flower quality in Eustoma grandiflorum. HortScience. 34(2), 233–234 (1999).Van, S. N., Minh, H. D. & Anh, D. N. Study on chitosan nanoparticles on biophysical characteristics and growth of Robusta coffee in green house. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2(4), 289–294 (2013).Kananont, N., Pichvangkura, R., Chanprame, S., Chadchawan, S. & Limpanavech, P. Chitosan specificity for the in vitro seed germination of two Dendrobium orchids (Asparagales: Orchidaceae). Sci. Hortic. 124(2), 239–247 (2010).Malerba, M. & Cerana, R. Chitosan Effects on Plant Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17(7), pii: E996 (2016).Uthairatanakij, A., da Silva, J. A. T. & Obsuwan, K. Chitosan for improving orchid production and quality. Orchid Sci. Biotechnol. 1(1), 1–5 (2007).Limpanavech, P. et al. Chitosan effects on floral production, gene expression, and anatomical changes in the Dendrobium orchid. Sci. Hortic. 116(1), 65–72 (2008).Nge, K. L., New, N., Chandrkrachang, S. & Stevens, W. F. Chitosan as a growth stimulator in orchid tissue culture. Plant Sci. 170(6), 1185–90 (2006).Khan, T. A., Peh, K. K. & Ch’ng, H. S. Reporting degree of deacetylation values of chitosan: the influence of analytical methods. J. Pharma. Sci. 5(3), 205–12 (2002).Iriti, M. & Faoro, F. Bioactivity of grape chemicals for human health. Nat. Prod. Commun. 4(5), 611–34 (2009).Pitta-Alvarez, S. I. & Giulietti, A. M. Influence of chitosan, acetic acid and citric acid on growth and tropane alkaloid production in transformed roots of Brugmansia candida effect of medium pH and growth phase. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 59(1), 31–38 (1999).Sivanandhan, G. et al. Chitosan enhances with anolides production in adventitious root cultures of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Ind. Crops Prod. 37, 124–129 (2012).Chatelain, P. G., Pintado, M. E. & Vasconcelos, M. W. Evaluation of chitooligosaccharide application on mineral accumulation and plant growth in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Sci. 214(15), 134–40 (2014).El-Tantawi, E. M. Behaviour of tomato plants as affected by spraying with chitosan and aminofort as natural stimulator substances under application of soil organic amendments. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 12(17), 1164–73 (2009).Sharp, R. G. 2013. A review of the applications of chitin and its derivatives in agriculture to modify plant-microbial interactions and improve crop yields. Agronomy. 3, 757–793 (2013).Aranega-Bou, P., de la O Leyva, M., Finiti, I., García-Agustín, P. & González-Bosch, C. Priming of plant resistance by natural compounds. Hexanoic acid as a model. Front. Plant Sci. 1(5), 488 (2014).Kwak, J. M., Nguyen, V. & Schroeder, J. I. The role of reactive oxygen species in hormonal responses. Plant Physiol. 141(2), 323–9 (2006).Lopez-Moya, F. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Omics for investigating chitosan as an antifungal and gene modulator. J. Fungi. 2(1), 1–11 (2016).Issak, M. et al. Neither endogenous abscisic acid nor endogenous jasmonate is involved in salicylic acid-, yeast elicitor-, orchitosan-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosc. Biotechnol. Biochem. 77(5), 1111–3 (2013).Vidhyasekaran, P. Switching on Plant Innate Immunity Signaling Systems: Bioengineering and Molecular Manipulation Of PAMP PIMP PRR Signaling Complex. Signaling and Communication In Plants. Chapt. 3. Switching on Plant Immune Signaling Systems using Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns/section 3.6 Manipulation of Plant Immune System using Chitosan 144–148, (Springer, 2016).Baque, Md. A., Shiragi, Md. H. K., Lee, E. J. & Paek, K.-Y. Elicitor effect of chitosan and pectin on the biosynthesis of anthraquinones, phenolics and flavonoids in adventitious root suspension cultures of Morinda citrifolia (L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6(9), 1349–1355 (2012).Khalil, M. S. & Badawy, M. E. I. Nematicidal activity of a biopolymer chitosan at different molecular weights against root-knot nematode. Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Prot. Sci. 48(4), 170–178 (2012).Sarkar, A. K. et al. Conserved factors regulate signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot and root stem cell organizers. Nature. 446(7137), 811–4 (2007).Ding, Z. & Friml, J. Auxin regulates distal stem cell differentiation in Arabidopsis roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(26), 12046–12051 (2010).Tian, H. et al. WOX5-IAA17 feedback circuit-mediated cellular auxin response is crucial for the patterning of root stem cell niches in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 7(2), 277–89 (2014).Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G. & Guilfoyle, T. The roles of auxin response factor domains in auxin-responsive transcription. Plant Cell. 15(2), 533–43 (2003).Doares, S. H., Syrovets, T., Weiler, E. W. & Ryan, C. A. Oligogalacturonides and chitosan activate plant defensive genes through the octadecanoid pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92(10), 4095–4098 (1995).Chandra, S. et al. Chitosan nanoparticles: A positive modulator of innate immune responses in plants. Sci. Rep. 5, 15195 (2015).Escudero, N. et al. Chitosan enhances parasitism of Meloidogyne javanica eggs by the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia. Fun. Biol. 120(4), 572–85 (2016).Escudero, N. et al. Chitosan Increases Tomato Root Colonization by Pochonia chlamydosporia and Their Combination Reduces Root-Knot Nematode Damage. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1415 (2017).Atkinson, N. J., Lilley, C. J. & Urwin, P. E. Identification of Genes Involved in the Response of Arabidopsis to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Plant Physiol. 162(4), 2028–2041 (2013).Kazan, K. Auxin and the integration of environmental signals into plant root development. Ann Bot 112(9), 1655–1665 (2013).Overvoorde, P., Fukaki, H. & Beeckman, T. Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2(6), a001537 (2010).Petricka, J. J., Winter, C. M. & Benfey, P. N. Control of Arabidopsis Root Development. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 563–590 (2012).Iriti, M. & Faoro, F. Chitosan as a MAMP, searching for a PRR. Plant Signal Behav. 4(1), 66–68 (2009).Jones, A. M. A new look at stress: abscisic acid patterns and dynamics at high-resolution. New Phytol. 210(1), 38–44 (2015).Wasternack, C. Jasmonates: An Update on Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction and Action in Plant Stress Response, Growth and Development. Ann. Bot. 100(4), 681–697 (2007).Wasternack, C. & Hause, B. Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann. Bot. 111(6), 1021–1058 (2013).Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 20(4), 219–29 (2015).Ning, Y., Liu, W. & Wang, G. L. Balancing Immunity and Yield in Crop Plants. Trends Plant Sci., 1385(17), 30206–6 (2017). pii: S1360.Zhang, R. Q., Zhu, H. H., Zhao, H. Q. & Yao, Q. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation increases phenolic synthesis in clover roots via hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid and nitric oxide signaling pathways. J. Plant Physiol. 170(1), 74–9 (2013).Dar, T. A., Uddin, M., Masroor, A. M., Hakeem, K. R. & Jaleel, H. 2015. Jasmonates counter plant stress: A Review. Environ. Exp. Bot. 115, 49–57 (2015).Kazan, K. & Lyons, R. 2016. The link between flowering time and stress tolerance. J Exp Bot. 67(1), 47–60 (2016).Jeong, S. et al. Rootin, a compound that inhibits root development through modulating PIN-mediated auxin distribution. Plant Sci. 233, 116–26 (2015).Amborabé, B. E., Bonmort, J., Fleurat-Lessard, P. & Roblin, G. Early events induced by chitosan on plant cells. J. Exp. Bot. 59(9), 2317–2324 (2008).Chen, X. Y. & Kim, J. Y. Callose synthesis in higher plants. Plant Signal Behav. 4(6), 489–492 (2009).Vasil’ev, L. A. et al. Chitosan-induced programmed cell death in plants. Biochem (Mosc). 74(9), 1035–43 (2009).Friml, J. et al. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature. 426(6963), 147–153 (2003).Xu, J. et al. A molecular framework for plant regeneration. Science. 311(5759), 385–8 (2006).Cheng, Y., Dai, X. & Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases controls the formation of floral organs and vascular tissues in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 20(13), 1790–1799 (2006).Cao, H., Bowling, S. A., Gordon, A. S. & Dong, X. Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Cell. 6(11), 1583–92 (1994).Dobón, A., Wulff, B. B., Canet, J. V., Fort, P. & Tornero, P. An allele of Arabidopsis COI1 with hypo- and hypermorphic phenotypes in plant growth, defence and fertility. Plos One. 8(1), e55115 (2013).Fernández-Calvo, P. et al. The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and act additively with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell. 23(2), 701–15 (2011).Ripoll, J. J., Ferrándiz, C., Martínez-Laborda, A. & Vera, A. PEPPER, a novel K-homology domain gene, regulates vegetative and gynoecium development in Arabidopsis. Dev. Biol. 289(2), 346–59 (2006).Bordallo, J. J. et al. Colonization of plant roots by egg-parasitic and nematode-trapping fungi. New Phytol. 154(2), 491–499 (2002).Palma-Guerrero, J., Jansson, H. B., Salinas, J. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Effect of chitosan on hyphal growth and spore germination of plant pathogenic and biocontrol fungi. J. App. Microbiol. 104(2), 541–53 (2008).Seo, M., Jikumaru, Y. & Kamiya, Y. Profiling of hormones and related metabolites in seed dormancy and germination studies. Methods Mol. Biol. 773, 99–111 (2011).Sabatini, S. et al. An auxin-dependent distal organizer of pattern and polarity in the Arabidopsis root. Cell. 99, 463–472 (1999).Weigel, D. & Glazebrook, J. Arabidopsis: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2002).Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 25, 402–408 (2001).Escudero, N. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Effects on plant growth and root-knot nematode infection of an endophytic GFP transformant of the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia. Symbiosis. 57(1), 33–42 (2012).Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Jansson, H. B., Talbot, N. J. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Real-time PCR quantification and live-cell imaging of endophytic colonization of barley (Hordeum ytvulgare) roots by Fusarium equiseti and Pochonia chlamydosporia. New Phytolo. 182(1), 213–28 (2009).Underwood, A. J. Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).Bartlett, M. S. 1937. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc. Royal. Soci. London Math. 160, 268–282 (1937)

Chitosan Increases Tomato Root Colonization by Pochonia chlamydosporia and Their Combination Reduces Root-Knot Nematode Damage

The use of biological control agents could be a non-chemical alternative for management of Meloidogyne spp. [root-knot nematodes (RKN)], the most damaging plant-parasitic nematodes for horticultural crops worldwide. Pochonia chlamydosporia is a fungal parasite of RKN eggs that can colonize endophytically roots of several cultivated plant species, but in field applications the fungus shows a low persistence and efficiency in RKN management. The combined use of P. chlamydosporia with an enhancer could help its ability to develop in soil and colonize roots, thereby increasing its efficiency against nematodes. Previous work has shown that chitosan enhances P. chlamydosporia sporulation and production of extracellular enzymes, as well as nematode egg parasitism in laboratory bioassays. This work shows that chitosan at low concentrations (up to 0.1 mg ml-1) do not affect the viability and germination of P. chlamydosporia chlamydospores and improves mycelial growth respect to treatments without chitosan. Tomato plants irrigated with chitosan (same dose limit) increased root weight and length after 30 days. Chitosan irrigation increased dry shoot and fresh root weight of tomato plants inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica, root length when they were inoculated with P. chlamydosporia, and dry shoot weight of plants inoculated with both P. chlamydosporia and M. javanica. Chitosan irrigation significantly enhanced root colonization by P. chlamydosporia, but neither nematode infection per plant nor fungal egg parasitism was affected. Tomato plants cultivated in a mid-suppressive (29.3 ± 4.7% RKN egg infection) non-sterilized clay loam soil and irrigated with chitosan had enhanced shoot growth, reduced RKN multiplication, and disease severity. Chitosan irrigation in a highly suppressive (73.7 ± 2.6% RKN egg infection) sterilized-sandy loam soil reduced RKN multiplication in tomato. However, chitosan did not affect disease severity or plant growth irrespective of soil sterilization. Chitosan, at an adequate dose, can be a potential tool for sustainable management of RKN.This research was funded by two grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (AGL 2013-49040-C2-1-R and AGL2015-66833-R,) and by a Ph.D. fellowship from the University of Alicante to NE (UAFPU2011). Part of this work was filed for a patent (P201431399) by LL-L, FL-M, and NE as inventors

Expression of serine proteases in egg-parasitic nematophagous fungi during barley root colonization

Nematophagous fungi Pochonia chlamydosporia and P. rubescens colonize endophytically barley roots. During nematode infection, serine proteases are secreted. We have investigated whether such proteases are also produced during root colonization. Polyclonal antibodies against serine protease P32 of P. rubescens cross-reacted with a related protease (VCP1) of P. chlamydosporia, but not with barley proteases. These antibodies also detected an unknown ca. 65-kDa protein, labeled hyphae and appressoria of P. chlamydosporia and strongly reduced proteolytic activity of extracts from fungus-colonized roots. Mass spectrometry (MS) of 32-kDa protein bands detected peptides homologous to VCP1 only in Pochonia-colonized roots. Peptides homologous to barley serine carboxypeptidases were found in 65 kDa bands of all roots. RT-PCR detected expression of VCP1 and a new P. chlamydosporia serine carboxypeptidase (SCP1) genes only in fungus-colonized roots. SCP1 shared limited sequence homology with VCP1 and P32. Expression in roots of proteases from nematophagous fungi could be greatly relevant for nematode biocontrol.This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation Grant AGL2008-00716/AGR

Fungal root endophytes from natural vegetation in Mediterranean environments with special reference to Fusarium spp

Surveys (in 2002 and 2003) were performed for fungal endophytes in roots of 24 plant species growing at 12 sites (coastal and inland soils, both sandy soils and salt marshes) under either water or salt stress in the Alicante province (Southeast Spain). All plant species examined were colonized by endophytic fungi. A total of 1830 fungal isolates were obtained and identified by morphological and molecular [internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and translation elongation factor-1α gene region (TEF-1α) sequencing] techniques. One hundred and forty-two fungal species were identified, belonging to 57 genera. Sterile mycelia were assigned to 177 morphospecies. Fusarium and Phoma species were the most frequent genera, followed by Aspergillus, Alternaria and Acremonium. Fungal root endophytic communities were influenced by the soil type where their respective host plants grew, but not by location (coastal or inland sites). Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus fumigatus and Alternaria chlamydospora contributed most to the differences found between endophytic communities from sandy and saline soils. Host preference was found for three Fusarium species studied. Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium solani were especially isolated from plants of the family Leguminosae, while Fusarium equiseti showed a preference for Lygeum spartum (Gramineae). In some cases, specificity could be related to intra-specific variability as shown by sequencing of the TEF-1α in the genus Fusarium