Genomic characterization of pediatric B‐lymphoblastic lymphoma and B‐lymphoblastic leukemia using formalin‐fixed tissues

BackgroundRecurrent genomic changes in B‐lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) identified by genome‐wide single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis provide important prognostic information, but gene copy number analysis of its rare lymphoma counterpart, B‐lymphoblastic lymphoma (B‐LBL), is limited by the low incidence and lack of fresh tissue for genomic testing.ProcedureWe used molecular inversion probe (MIP) technology to analyze and compare copy number alterations (CNAs) in archival formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded pediatric B‐LBL (n = 23) and B‐ALL (n = 55).ResultsSimilar to B‐ALL, CDKN2A/B deletions were the most common alteration identified in 6/23 (26%) B‐LBL cases. Eleven of 23 (48%) B‐LBL patients were hyperdiploid, but none showed triple trisomies (chromosomes 4, 10, and 17) characteristic of B‐ALL. IKZF1 and PAX5 deletions were observed in 13 and 17% of B‐LBL, respectively, which was similar to the reported frequency in B‐ALL. Immunoglobulin light chain lambda (IGL) locus deletions consistent with normal light chain rearrangement were observed in 5/23 (22%) B‐LBL cases, compared with only 1% in B‐ALL samples. None of the B‐LBL cases showed abnormal, isolated VPREB1 deletion adjacent to IGL locus, which we identified in 25% of B‐ALL.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that the copy number profile of B‐LBL is distinct from B‐ALL, suggesting possible differences in pathogenesis between these closely related diseases.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137353/1/pbc26363.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137353/2/pbc26363_am.pd

Detection of epstein-barr virus in the L and H cells of nodular lymphocyte predominance Hodgkin\u27s disease: Report of a case documented by immunohistochemical, in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods

Although Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is commonly present in the neoplastic Reed-Sternberg and Hodgkin cells of the mixed cellularity, nodular sclerosis, and lymphocyte depletion types of Hodgkin\u27s disease (HD), EBV is rare in the neoplastic cells of the nodular lymphocyte predominance type of HD, particularly in the United States. We describe a 19-year-old Hispanic man in whom nodular lymphocyte predominance HD involved a cervical lymph node. Epstein-Barr virus was identified in the neoplastic L and H cells by using in situ hybridization for EBV RNA and immunohistochemical staining for EBV latent membrane protein-1. Polymerase chain reaction studies demonstrated the type A strain of EBV. The presence of EBV in this case may be related to drainage of the virus from the oropharynx to the cervical lymph node. The presence of EBV also may be related to this patient\u27s Hispanic ethnic origin

Donor origin of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder localized to a liver allograft: Demonstration by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Setting. - Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in solid organ transplantation are mostly of recipient origin. We report an unusual case of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder following liver transplantation with localized limited involvement of the solid organ allograft. Design. - Tissues were obtained at the time of surgery and evaluated by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome X and Y centromeric probes. Patient. - A 53- year-old Hispanic man with hepatic failure due to hepatitis C virus who underwent orthotopic liver transplant from a female donor and developed posttransplant lymphoma in the transplanted liver. Intervention. Withdrawal of immunosuppression, resection of liver allograft, and second transplant. Results. - This posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was clearly shown to be derived from Epstein-Barr virus-infected donor lymphoid cells. This was demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization for X and Y chromosomes in paraffin sections in a sex-mismatched transplant. Despite aggressive histology (monoclonal B-cell immunoblastic lymphoma) and lack of response to withdrawal of immunosuppression, the posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was successfully managed by repeat liver transplantation without recurrence. Conclusion. - Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to prove donor derivation in a posttransplant lymphoma of the liver. Allograft- localized donor posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder may represent a unique category with more favorable prognosis requiring different clinical management from other cases

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in liver allograft biopsies: A comparison of three methods for the demonstration of Epstein-Barr virus

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and may clinically resemble acute allograft rejection. Three methods to show EBV in tissue were evaluated in 15 liver allograft biopsies from 12 patients including four with PTLD: (1) semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for EBV DNA; (2) in situ hybridization for EBV RNA (EBER); and (3) immunoperoxidase for EBV latent membrane protein (LMP). Index cases had a PCR dot blot result of \u27positive\u27 or \u27weak positive.\u27 Findings were correlated with histology, clinical data, therapy, and outcome. All four PTLD patients had a clinical diagnosis of acute rejection. All four showed EBV: PCR 4, EBER 4, LMP 3. Liver function tests were elevated in three, but EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgM was not increased in three. Immunosuppression was withdrawn and all four patients underwent a second transplantation. One died 4 days posttransplant with disseminated PTLD, two died of sepsis at 1.5 and 14 months, and one is well at 3 years without PTLD. Eleven biopsies without PTLD showed: acute rejection 7, acute rejection and hepatitis 1, hepatitis B 1, and non-inflammatory changes 2. In this group, EBV results included: PCR weak positive in 10 and 1+ in one, EBER negative in ten and rare positive cells in one, LMP negative in 11. Liver function tests were elevated in 10, whereas VCA IgM was not increased in three and increased in one. Patients with acute rejection were treated with increased immunosuppression: none developed PTLD, with follow- up of at least 6 months in dine cases. Two patients died within 4 months of biopsy. One patient with PTLD in tonsils had a liver biopsy showing both acute rejection and EBV (PCR 1+, rare EBER + small cells). Histological studies combined with special EBV detection methods, can be useful to evaluate atypical lymphoid infiltrates in liver allograft biopsies and confirmation of a diagnosis of PTLD. All three methods are useful; EBER and PCR are the most sensitive. EBER and LMP can use paraffin sections

Pros and cons for C4d as a biomarker

The introduction of C4d in daily clinical practice in the late nineties aroused an ever-increasing interest in the role of antibody-mediated mechanisms in allograft rejection. As a marker of classical complement activation, C4d made it possible to visualize the direct link between anti-donor antibodies and tissue injury at sites of antibody binding in a graft. With the expanding use of C4d worldwide several limitations of C4d were identified. For instance, in ABO-incompatible transplantations C4d is present in the majority of grafts but this seems to point at ‘graft accommodation’ rather than antibody-mediated rejection. C4d is now increasingly recognized as a potential biomarker in other fields where antibodies can cause tissue damage, such as systemic autoimmune diseases and pregnancy. In all these fields, C4d holds promise to detect patients at risk for the consequences of antibody-mediated disease. Moreover, the emergence of new therapeutics that block complement activation makes C4d a marker with potential to identify patients who may possibly benefit from these drugs. This review provides an overview of the past, present, and future perspectives of C4d as a biomarker, focusing on its use in solid organ transplantation and discussing its possible new roles in autoimmunity and pregnancy