SPARC is expressed in renal interstitial fibrosis and in renal vascular injury

SPARC is expressed in renal interstitial fibrosis and in renal vascular injury. Tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis are critical determinants for renal function and prognosis in a variety of human nephropathies. Yet, the pathophysiology of the injury remains obscure. We investigated the expression of SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in experimental models characterized by tubulointerstitial fibrosis and matrix expansion in rats. SPARC is a secreted glycoprotein that has been demonstrated to affect cellular interaction with matrix proteins, modulate cell proliferation, bind to and/or inhibit growth factors such as PDGF and bFGF, and regulate angiogenesis. Interstitial expression of SPARC was most prominent in passive Heyman nephritis (PHN), chronic cyclosporine A (CsA) nephropathy, and the remnant kidney model and, to a lesser extent, in angiotensin II (Ang II)-infused animals. SPARC protein and mRNA were substantially increased at sites of tubulointerstitial fibrosis/matrix expansion. In the PHN model, SPARC protein was expressed by interstitial fibroblasts that also produced α-smooth muscle actin (“myofibroblasts”) and correlated both temporally (r = 0.97) and spatially with sites of type I collagen deposition. Interstitial cell proliferation preceded the development of interstitial fibrosis, and maximal SPARC expression (d15) coincided with the initial decline in interstitial proliferation. In the Ang II-infusion model, which is characterized by arteriolopathy and tubulointerstitial injury, an increase in SPARC protein and mRNA was also seen in injured blood vessels. SPARC was shown to be expressed by vascular smooth muscle cells and also by cells in the adventitia of hypertrophied arteries. In summary, SPARC was transiently expressed by interstitial fibroblasts at sites of tubulointerstitial injury and fibrosis, and by smooth muscle cells and cells in the adventitia of injured arteries in the Ang II-model. In addition to its proposed role in extracellular matrix deposition, the antiproliferative properties of SPARC might contribute to the resolution of interstitial fibroblast proliferation in the PHN model

Acceptability of OP/Na swabbing for SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort surveillance study in Western Australian schools

Objectives: When the COVID-19 pandemic was declared, Governments responded with lockdown and isolation measures to combat viral spread, including the closure of many schools. More than a year later, widespread screening for SARS-CoV-2 is critical to allow schools and other institutions to remain open. Here, we describe the acceptability of a minimally invasive COVID-19 screening protocol trialled by the Western Australian Government to mitigate the risks of and boost public confidence in schools remaining open. To minimise discomfort, and optimise recruitment and tolerability in unaccompanied children, a combined throat and nasal (OP/Na) swab was chosen over the nasopharyngeal swab commonly used, despite slightly reduced test performance. Design, setting and participants: Trialling of OP/Na swabbing took place as part of a prospective observational cohort surveillance study in 79 schools across Western Australia. Swabs were collected from 5903 asymptomatic students and 1036 asymptomatic staff in 40 schools monthly between June and September 2020. Outcome measures: PCR testing was performed with a two-step diagnostic and independent confirmatory PCR for any diagnostic PCR positives. Concurrent surveys, collected online through the REDCap platform, evaluated participant experiences of in-school swabbing. Results: 13 988 swabs were collected from students and staff. There were zero positive test results for SARS-CoV-2, including no false positives. Participants reported high acceptability: 71% of students reported no or minimal discomfort and most were willing to be reswabbed (4% refusal rate). Conclusions: OP/Na swabbing is acceptable and repeatable in schoolchildren as young as 4 years old and may combat noncompliance rates by significantly increasing the acceptability of testing. This kind of minimally-invasive testing will be key to the success of ongoing, voluntary mass screening as society adjusts to a new ‘normal’ in the face of COVID-19. Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry—ACTRN12620000922976

DETECT schools study protocol: A prospective observational cohort surveillance study investigating the impact of COVID-19 in Western Australian schools

Introduction: Amidst the evolving COVID-19 pandemic, understanding the transmission dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is key to providing peace of mind for the community and informing policy-making decisions. While available data suggest that school-aged children are not significant spreaders of SARS-CoV-2, the possibility of transmission in schools remains an ongoing concern, especially among an aging teaching workforce. Even in low-prevalence settings, communities must balance the potential risk of transmission with the need for students\u27 ongoing education. Through the roll out of high-throughput school-based SARS-CoV-2 testing, enhanced follow-up for individuals exposed to COVID-19 and wellbeing surveys, this study investigates the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the current psychosocial wellbeing impacts of the pandemic in school communities. Methods: The DETECT Schools Study is a prospective observational cohort surveillance study in 79 schools across Western Australia (WA), Australia. To investigate the incidence, transmission and impact of SARS-CoV-2 in schools, the study comprises three “modules”: Module 1) Spot-testing in schools to screen for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2; Module 2) Enhanced surveillance of close contacts following the identification of any COVID-19 case to determine the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in a school setting; and Module 3) Survey monitoring of school staff, students and their parents to assess psycho-social wellbeing following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in WA. Clinical Trial Registration: Trial registration number: ACTRN1262000092297

A nonrandomized phase I and biomarker trial of regorafenib in advanced myeloid malignancies

Abstract We conducted a single‐center, open‐label, dose escalation, and expansion phase I trial of the antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor regorafenib in patients with advanced myeloid neoplasms. We enrolled 16 patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used with two planned dose levels (120 or 160 mg daily) and one de‐escalation level (80 mg daily). An additional 10 patients were treated on an expansion cohort. The recommended phase two dose of regorafenib was 160 mg daily, with no dose‐limiting toxicities. The best overall disease response by International Working Group criteria included one partial and stable disease in 11 patients. Tissue studies indicated no change in Ras/mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation in responders. Pharmacodynamic changes in plasma VEGF, PlGF, and sVEGFR2 were detected during treatment. Baseline proinflammatory and angiogenic cytokine levels were not associated with clinical response. Single‐agent regorafenib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory myeloid malignancy patients. Most patients achieved stable disease, with modest improvements in cell counts in some MDS patients. Biomarker studies were consistent with on‐target effects of regorafenib on angiogenesis. Future studies should investigate the role of regorafenib in combination therapy approaches