Beyond the Campus: Some Initial Findings on Women’s Studies, Careers and Employers

From the Introduction: (I)nstitutions of higher learning are being transformed by the discourses of economic rationalism and the marketplace so that many practitioners are discovering first-hand how readily Women’s Studies programs become vulnerable to arguments made against maintaining allegedly “useless” and “non-vocational” areas of study (see Griffin 1998, Kessler-Harris and Swerdlow 1996). The reconfiguration of higher education within a broadly consumerist logic and growing rates of unemployment and underemployment among university graduates in many western societies also mean that not just administrators, but students (and their families) are now inquiring into the vocational relevance and the long-term “rewards” of specific teaching programs (see Skeggs 1995). Indeed, given these shifts in educational, fiscal, and political priorities, we suggest it may become increasingly difficult for teachers and researchers, especially those in public institutions, to continue fostering Women’s Studies programs and their students in the absence of clear understandings of students’ vocational aspirations, their post-graduation experiences, and the changing environment in which important educational and vocational decisions are being negotiated. Beyond the immediate career and vocational context, such considerations also offer significant opportunities for reflecting on the connections between our professed teaching and learning objectives and our students’ needs, desires and aspirations, as well as opportunities for learning more about what brings students into our classrooms and the visions they have for their lives beyond graduation. In what follows, we discuss some interim findings of on-going research conducted among enrolled Women’s Studies students and among prospective employers

Children and young people's participation in planning and regeneration: a final report to the Ecorys Research Programme 2010-11

This briefing paper summarises the findings from research carried out by Ecorys (formerly ECOTEC) and Loughborough University. The study set out to examine children and young people's roles in planning, design and regeneration in the UK and internationally; to map and assess different models of practice, and to locate these practices within wider debates about children's participation and citizenship. It also aimed to review the methods used to measure impact and outcomes in this area. The work was carried out between June 2010 and January 2011, and funded through the 2010-11 Round of the Ecorys Research Programme1. The methodology comprised a review of UK and international research literature, adopting the principles of a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA)2; an analysis of selected UK policy and strategy documents, and a small number of exploratory stakeholder interviews. The research team was supported by an Advisory Group with representatives from policy and academia. The report concludes that the spatial aspects of children's participation crosscut the wider participation agenda, but have too often been overlooked within a service-driven approach to policymaking. There is evidence from research and practice that children and young people can play a significant role within planning and regeneration processes, with potential benefits at individual, peer group and community levels. A stronger evidence base is clearly needed to understand the longer-term impacts in this area. The recent change in government and emerging policies present both opportunities and challenges for children and young people's participation within the UK. There has been a renewed focus on citizenship of sorts, whilst the Localism agenda and Big Society place an emphasis on municipal leadership, which is a characteristic feature of many rights-based programmes worldwide. However, public sector funding cuts, coupled with the dismantlement of the national planning framework arguably run the risk of leaving children more vulnerable to exclusion from local planning decisions that affect their lives. The authors argue that developing a more outward-facing approach, and engaging with the various transnational networks of good practice that have been established around the CRC agenda should be a priority

Implicit theories of a desire for fame

The aim of the present studies was to generate implicit theories of a desire for fame among the general population. In Study 1, we were able to develop a nine-factor analytic model of conceptions of the desire to be famous that initially comprised nine separate factors; ambition, meaning derived through comparison with others, psychologically vulnerable, attention seeking, conceitedness, social access, altruistic, positive affect, and glamour. Analysis that sought to examine replicability among these factors suggested that three factors (altruistic, positive affect, and glamour) neither display factor congruence nor display adequate internal reliability. A second study examined the validity of these factors in predicting profiles of individuals who may desire fame. The findings from this study suggested that two of the nine factors (positive affect and altruism) could not be considered strong factors within the model. Overall, the findings suggest that implicit theories of a desire for fame comprise six factors. The discussion focuses on how an implicit model of a desire for fame might progress into formal theories of a desire for fame

The position of authenticity within extant models of personality.

The aim of the current study was to explore where authenticity, derived from the humanistic tradition of psychology, was positioned within a number of extant models of personality. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of data from four samples (total N = 1286) suggested that authenticity can be considered as loading on the Honesty–Humility factor of personality. These findings are discussed in terms of the wider theoretical overlaps between Honesty–Humility and psychological functioning as emphasised by the humanistic tradition of psychology

Early specialist orthotic interventions for the lower limb in adult stroke patients: a systematic literature review

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, estimated to affect up to 50% of stroke survivors. Many stroke survivors use orthotic splints and braces to help address difficulties with mobility and gait dysfunction both early after the stroke event and longer-term.Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to identify, synthesise and appraise the evidence on early orthotic involvement for the lower limb following stroke.Study design: Systematic literature reviewMethods We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases including: AMED (1985 to present; CINAHL (1982 to present); EMBASE (1980 to present); MEDLINE (1949 to present); PsycINFO (1967 to present). The search took place on 18/10/2019. Included studies evaluated an early orthotic intervention designed to either promote mobility or reduce secondary complications after stroke. Articles were screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers.Results: This review included six articles from one research group in the Netherlands. Methodological quality was considered good in each of the included studies. Limitations include small sample size, restricted descriptions of the intervention and short-term follow-ups.Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that earlier lower limb orthotic interventions can result in improved walking speed and balance, and enhanced ability to perform activities of daily living in the early weeks post-stroke. Future research would benefit from considering wider orthotic and orthotist intervention with larger sample sizes and longer-term outcomes

An ecological systems model of trait resilience: Cross-cultural and clinical relevance

© 2016. The study explored how scores on the three dimensions of the Engineering, Ecological, and Adaptive Capacity (EEA) trait resilience scale, derived from Holling's ecological systems theory of resilience, demonstrate fit within higher-order bifactor models of measurement, cultural invariance, and associations with clinical caseness of affect. Three samples (295 US adults, and 179 Japanese and 251 Polish university students) completed the EEA trait resilience scale. In addition, a subsample of US adults were administered the Ten-Item Personality Inventory and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Across all samples, a higher-order bifactor model provided the best fit of the data, with salience of loadings on the three group factors. A multi-group comparison found configural invariance, but neither metric nor scalar invariance, for EEA resilience scores across the three samples. Among the US sample, engineering and adaptive trait resilience scores predicted clinical caseness of depression, and adaptive trait resilience scores predicted clinical caseness of anxiety, after controlling for sex, age, income, education, employment, and personality. The findings suggest the cross-cultural replicability of the structure (but not the meaning) of the three-factor EEA measure of trait resilience, and its relevance for predicting clinical caseness of affect among a US sample

Bumps and Babies Longitudinal Study (BABBLES): An independent evaluation of the Baby Buddy app

Introduction: Developments in information and communication technologies have enabled and supported the development and expansion of electronic health in the last decade. This has increased the possibility of self-management and care of health issues.Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of on maternal self-efficacy and mental wellbeing three months post-birth in a sample of mothers recruited during the antenatal period. In addition, to explore when, why and how mothers use the app and consider any benefits the app may offer them in relation to their parenting, health, relationships or communication with their child, friends, family members or health professionals.Design: A mixed methods approach, including a longitudinal cohort study, a qualitative study and detailed analysis and synthesis of data from the Baby Buddy app about the way in which mothers accessed and used the app content.Setting: The study was conducted in five geographically separate sites in England: Coventry, Lewisham, Bradford, Blackpool and Leicester. These areas were chosen as they were geographically, ethnically and socio-economically diverse and where the Baby Buddy app was reported to be well-embedded, both formally and informally, into the maternity and child health pathways by the relevant healthcare staff.Participants: Pregnant women who were aged 16 years and over, had no previous live child, were between 12-16 weeks and six days gestation and booked with the maternity services in each of the five study sites were invited to take part.Interventions: Self-reported use of the Baby Buddy app at one of the three data collection time-points: 12-16+6 weeks gestation, 35 weeks gestation and three months post-birth.Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was parental self-efficacy at three months post-birth using the Tool to measure Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE). The main secondary outcome was maternal mental well-being at three months post-birth using the Warwick and Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS).Results: Recruitment took place between September 2016 and February 2017. A total of 488 participants provided valid data at baseline (12-16 weeks gestation), 296 participants also provided valid data at 3 months post-birth, 114 (38.5%) of whom reported that they had used the Baby Buddy app at one or more of the data collection time-points (‘app user’). Seventeen first-time mothers participated in the qualitative arm via telephone interviews (n=9) and a focus group (n=8). Twenty healthcare professionals participated in interviews (n=5) and two focus groups (n=15). Consent was gained from 98 participants who gave permission for their in-app4data to be made accessible but just 61 participants could be identified from the database provided, of whom 51 were included in the analyses.At recruitment there were no differences between Baby Buddy app users and non-app users in respect to: age, IMD, ethnicity, highest education, employment, relationship status. Baby Buddy app users were more likely to use pregnancy or parenting apps (80.7% vs 69.6%, p=.035), more likely to have been introduced to the app by a healthcare professional (p=.005) and have a lower median score for perceived social support (81 vs 83, p=.034) than non-app users. The Baby Buddy app did not illicit a statistically significant change in TOPSE scores from baseline to 3 months post-birth (adjusted OR 1.12, 95%CI 0.59 to 2.13, p=.730). Finding out about the Baby Buddy app from a healthcare professional appeared to grant no additional benefit to app users compared to all other participants in terms of self-efficacy at three months post-birth (adjusted OR 1.16, 95%CI 0.60 to 2.23, p=.666).Apps were popular; Baby Buddy app users were more likely to use other pregnancy-related apps than non-Baby Buddy users and the most frequent source from which Baby Buddy app users found out about the app was a midwife. A post-hoc analysis found that Baby Buddy app users were more likely to breastfeed than non-Baby Buddy app users. This was a consistent pattern for both exclusive breastfeeding and any breast feeding: there was a 9% increase in exclusive breastfeeding at any time up to 3 months post-birth in Baby Buddy app users and a 12% increase in any breastfeeding up to three months post-birth, compared to non-app users. Whilst this is an important finding, this needs to be used with care due to the post-hoc element of the analysis.First-time mothers who participated in the qualitative arm of the study found that the Baby Buddy app worked well due to its accessibility and that the information was concise and easy to find. They liked that it followed the progress of pregnancy with appropriately-timed information and that different aspects could be accessed as and when needed. The app was designed to be an adjunct to service delivery not a replacement for healthcare. The importance of this was demonstrated by many first-time mothers reporting that they preferred in-practice support from a healthcare professional.The qualitative data indicated that the four preconditions of normalisation process theory: implementation, adoption, translation and stabilisation were met in regard to healthcare professionals’ use of the Baby Buddy app. This suggests that the healthcare professionals were actively integrating the Baby Buddy app into clinical practice with other professionals and first-time mothers, therefore embedding the Baby Buddy app into their service delivery.The in-app data from the sub-sample of participants (n=51) suggest that there was a difference in the amount of time participants spent accessing elements of the app; the median time spent using the app per session was 8.3 minutes (SD 5.8 minutes). The most popular features that5were used were ‘Today’s Information’, videos, ‘Bump/Baby Booth’, ‘Ask Me’ and ‘What does that mean?’. Participants used the app most often between 9-10am with another peak in the evening around 8-9pm. There were also a broad range of topics and issues that the participants searched for, of which the most searched words included: ‘labour’, ‘form’, ‘birth’, ‘pregnant’ and ‘developing’. In the sub-sample for whom we had in-app data, there was a large range for the number of times the app was used, from 0-593 times. The median number of times the app was opened was 146.5 but the data were positively skewed (LQ 52.5 – UQ 329). This indicates that the data are bunched towards the smaller number of times opened. Within this sub-sample, 21.6% of the engaged type of user used the app up to 25 times and 47% of this type of user used the app more than 100 times. This contrasts with the highly engaged type of user where 43% used the app 25 or less times and just 9.8% of this proactive type of user used it more than 100 times.We found no statistically significant difference in the TOPSE or the WEMWBS scores between the type of user who was engaged with the app and non-app users (adjusted OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.22 to 2.16, p=.519 and adjusted OR 1.54, 95%CI 0.57 to 4.16, p=.329, respectively). Similarly, we found no statistically significant difference between the type of users who were highly engaged users and non-app users (TOPSE: adjusted OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.14t o 1.68, p=.251; WEMWBS: adjusted OR 1.40, 95%CI 0.52 to 3.76, p=.509).Strengths and limitations: The primary objective was to explore the impact of the Baby Buddy app on parental self-efficacy and the Tool for Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE website, Kendall, Bloomfield and Nash 2009), a validated measure, was selected to measure the primary outcome. The retention rate of 60.7% from baseline to three months post-birth demonstrates the difficulty of engaging new mothers during this demanding period of their lives. Nevertheless, in the initial and final samples, app users and non-users remained generally comparable and relevant confounders were adjusted for. Mothers were invited to take part in interviews and/or focus groups, the latter of which were held in a baby-friendly, welcoming environment for women and babies. Telephone interviews were offered for greater convenience for the women. Analysing the in-app data, we were able to compare outcomes for both the high versus low or non-user app groups and for those mothers who were the type of highly engaged users versus those who were a less engaged type. This was for a relatively small number of mothers but was a new method of analysing the in-app data.The Baby Buddy app was publicly available, meaning randomisation was not possible and therefore participants were only asked about their specific use of the app after the 35 weeks gestation data collection point to avoid directed app use. The participants were a self-selected group, especially those for whom we had in-app data and this is reflected in the higher than the national average for women who were degree holders (58.6% in final sample versus 42% nationally). The overall TOPSE scores were high at baseline which meant there was little room6for improvement. Nevertheless, there was no difference between the Baby Buddy app users and those participants who did not use the app.Conclusions: First-time mothers in the study found the app accessible and the information concise. The quantitative results, including those from the in-app data, found no evidence of impact from the Baby Buddy app on the primary outcome of parental self-efficacy or mental well-being (secondary outcome) at three months post-birth. The participant mothers had lower social support scale scores, which might suggest that the app attracted mothers who had a smaller social support network. Both mothers and healthcare professionals valued the fact that the Baby Buddy app was professionally endorsed which encouraged the women to trust the contents and the healthcare professionals to use it in their everyday practice. The most frequent source from which Baby Buddy app users found out about the app was a midwife, which suggests that the embedding of the app into service delivery by Best Beginnings was beneficial. A post-hoc finding was that women who used the Baby Buddy app were significantly more likely to exclusively breastfeed, or ever breastfeed, than those not using the app. The Baby Buddy app has gone some way to help to ‘Make Every Contact Count’ for both first-time mothers and healthcare professionals

A decade and a half of learning from Madagascar’s first locally managed marine area

While the participatory management of small scale fisheries has been widely promoted, we have limited understanding of the factors influencing its effectiveness. Here, we highlight lessons learnt from the implementation of Madagascar’s first locally managed marine area (LMMA), drawing on our insights and experiences as staff of a co-managing non-governmental organisation (NGO). We describe the LMMA’s context and history, and highlight aspects of our approach that we feel underpin its outcomes, including: i) co-management rather than community-management, ii) the permanent field presence of a supporting NGO, iii) a management focus on locally-important natural resources, iv) the implementation of poverty-alleviation initiatives aimed at reducing barriers to management, v) decision-making by resource users rather than scientists, vi) a diversified, entrepreneurial funding model, and vii) an emphasis on monitoring and adaptive management. We also highlight several challenges, including: i) the inability to influence fishery supply chains, ii) promoting participation and good governance, iii) promoting rule application, iv) standing up to outsiders, v) promoting environmental management in the long term, and vi) maintaining funding. Our experiences suggest that small scale fishers can be effective natural resource managers in low income contexts, but may need extended support from outsiders; however the role of supporting NGO is nuanced and complex

Fiction Fix 16

https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/fiction_fix/1017/thumbnail.jp