268 research outputs found

    DYRK1A and the Cell Cycle

    Get PDF
    The ability to halt the cell cycle is critical for cells to maintain tissue and organ size, to suppress tumors and abnormal growth, and exists as a helpful mechanism to pause the cell cycle for DNA repair. DYRK1A is (dual specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A) a human gene found on the long (q) arm of chromosome 21, which is known to be involved with nervous system development, cell growth and division, and neuronal differentiation. In glioblastoma cells grown in vitro (T98G cell line), there are three copies of DYRK1A, which have dosage- dependent effects on the cell, including association with cognitive delays in Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21), and relevance to cancer (loss of DYRK1A leads to oncogenic transformation of fallopian tube epithelial cells by Ras and p53). In terms of DYRK1A’s role in the cell cycle, it is known as a putative tumor suppressor, mainly through its critical role in phosphorylating a Serine 28 residue on protein LIN52, leading to the formation of the DREAM complex. DREAM promotes exit from the cell cycle and cell quiescence (arrest in G0 phase). Surprisingly, DYRK1A-KO (knockout) cells actually slowed down cell proliferation, which is an unexpected result when knocking out a tumor suppressor. Through several experiments, involving cell cycle flow cytometry, western blotting for protein cell cycle markers, and EdU staining to determine whether these cells were actively undergoing DNA synthesis, we were able to determine that DYRK1A-KO T98G cells were entering the cell cycle and undergoing DNA synthesis more slowly that control cells.https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/gradposters/1068/thumbnail.jp

    Investigation of the DYRK1A Regulation by LZTS2-SIPA1L1 Complex

    Get PDF
    A region on chromosome 21, the Down Syndrome critical region (DSCR), is associated with major defects found in Down Syndrome, such as craniofacial malformations. DYRK1A is a gene found on chromosome 21 within the DSCR that encodes an enzyme, dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A. DYRK1A is known to phosphorylate many substrate proteins and is thought to be involved in tumor suppression, neurological development, cell cycle regulation, and aging. Recently, the Litovchick lab and others reported that DYRK1A also plays a role in the double-strand break repair of DNA, which could lead to mutations and tumorigenesis, if deregulated. The Litovchick lab is currently investigating novel interactions of DYRK1A, and their implications for cancer. One of these proteins, DCAF7, is already a well-known DYRK1A interacting partner. Another less characterized protein is LZTS2, also known as LAPSER1 or leucine-zipper tumor suppressor 2. LZTS2 is found to be deleted in many human tumors and is known to bind a signaling intermediate SIPA1L1.2 Our preliminary data show that LZTS2 may promote DYRK1A phosphorylation, thereby regulating DYRK1A kinase activity. We suspect that SIPA1L1 may be involved in this interaction and, as this complex is known to be involved in the WNT pathway that plays a role in both cancer and orofacial formation, To test this hypothesis, we started characterization of the DYRK1A-LZTS2 interaction using ectopic expressions of the full-length LZTS2 and DYRK1A as well as their fragments expressed in human T98G cells. We will further perform experiments investigating the physical binding and functional interactions between DCAF7, SIPA1L1, and the DYRK1A-LZTS2 complex.https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/uresposters/1442/thumbnail.jp

    Insights from the protein interaction Universe of the multifunctional “Goldilocks” kinase DYRK1A

    Get PDF
    Human Dual specificity tyrosine (Y)-Regulated Kinase 1A (DYRK1A) is encoded by a dosage-dependent gene located in the Down syndrome critical region of human chromosome 21. The known substrates of DYRK1A include proteins involved in transcription, cell cycle control, DNA repair and other processes. However, the function and regulation of this kinase is not fully understood, and the current knowledge does not fully explain the dosage-dependent function of this kinase. Several recent proteomic studies identified DYRK1A interacting proteins in several human cell lines. Interestingly, several of known protein substrates of DYRK1A were undetectable in these studies, likely due to a transient nature of the kinase-substrate interaction. It is possible that the stronger-binding DYRK1A interacting proteins, many of which are poorly characterized, are involved in regulatory functions by recruiting DYRK1A to the specific subcellular compartments or distinct signaling pathways. Better understanding of these DYRK1A-interacting proteins could help to decode the cellular processes regulated by this important protein kinase during embryonic development and in the adult organism. Here, we review the current knowledge of the biochemical and functional characterization of the DYRK1A protein-protein interaction network and discuss its involvement in human disease

    Structure–activity relationships of aminoglycoside-arginine conjugates that bind HIV-1 RNAs as determined by fluorescence and NMR spectroscopy

    Get PDF
    AbstractWe present here a new set of aminoglycoside-arginine conjugates (AACs) that are either site-specific or per-arginine conjugates of paromomycin, neamine, and neomycin B as well as their structure–activity relationships. Their binding constants (KD) for TAR and RRE RNAs, measured by fluorescence anisotropy, revealed dependence on the number and location of arginines in the different aminoglycoside conjugates. The binding affinity of the per-arginine aminoglycosides to TAR is higher than to RRE, and hexa-arginine neomycin B is the most potent binder (KD=5 and 23 nM, respectively). The 2D TOCSY NMR spectrum of the TAR monoarginine-neomycin complex reveals binding at the bulge region of TAR

    Simultaneous expression of MMB-FOXM1 complex components enables efficient bypass of senescence

    Get PDF
    Cellular senescence is a stable cell cycle arrest that normal cells undergo after a finite number of divisions, in response to a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli. Although senescence is largely established and maintained by the p53/p21WAF1/CIP1 and pRB/p16INK4A tumour suppressor pathways, the downstream targets responsible for the stability of the growth arrest are not known. We have employed a stable senescence bypass assay in conditionally immortalised human breast fibroblasts (CL3EcoR) to investigate the role of the DREAM complex and its associated components in senescence. DREAM is a multi-subunit complex comprised of the MuvB core, containing LIN9, LIN37, LIN52, LIN54, and RBBP4, that when bound to p130, an RB1 like protein, and E2F4 inhibits cell cycle-dependent gene expression thereby arresting cell division. Phosphorylation of LIN52 at Serine 28 is required for DREAM assembly. Re-entry into the cell cycle upon phosphorylation of p130 leads to disruption of the DREAM complex and the MuvB core, associating initially to B-MYB and later to FOXM1 to form MMB and MMB-FOXM1 complexes respectively. Here we report that simultaneous expression of MMB-FOXM1 complex components efficiently bypasses senescence with LIN52, B-MYB, and FOXM1 as the crucial components. Moreover, bypass of senescence requires non-phosphorylated LIN52 that disrupts the DREAM complex, thereby indicating a central role for assembly of the DREAM complex in senescence

    Structural mechanisms of DREAM complex assembly and regulation

    Get PDF
    The DREAM complex represses cell cycle genes during quiescence through scaffolding MuvB proteins with E2F4/5 and the Rb tumor suppressor paralog p107 or p130. Upon cell cycle entry, MuvB dissociates from p107/p130 and recruits B-Myb and FoxM1 for up-regulating mitotic gene expression. To understand the biochemical mechanisms underpinning DREAM function and regulation, we investigated the structural basis for DREAM assembly. We identified a sequence in the MuvB component LIN52 that binds directly to the pocket domains of p107 and p130 when phosphorylated on the DYRK1A kinase site S28. A crystal structure of the LIN52–p107 complex reveals that LIN52 uses a suboptimal LxSxExL sequence together with the phosphate at nearby S28 to bind the LxCxE cleft of the pocket domain with high affinity. The structure explains the specificity for p107/p130 over Rb in the DREAM complex and how the complex is disrupted by viral oncoproteins. Based on insights from the structure, we addressed how DREAM is disassembled upon cell cycle entry. We found that p130 and B-Myb can both bind the core MuvB complex simultaneously but that cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation of p130 weakens its association. Together, our data inform a novel target interface for studying MuvB and p130 function and the design of inhibitors that prevent tumor escape in quiescence

    The CHR promoter element controls cell cycle-dependent gene transcription and binds the DREAM and MMB complexes

    Get PDF
    Cell cycle-dependent gene expression is often controlled on the transcriptional level. Genes like cyclin B, CDC2 and CDC25C are regulated by cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) and cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) promoter elements mainly through repression in G0/G1. It had been suggested that E2F4 binding to CDE sites is central to transcriptional regulation. However, some promoters are only controlled by a CHR. We identify the DREAM complex binding to the CHR of mouse and human cyclin B2 promoters in G0. Association of DREAM and cell cycle-dependent regulation is abrogated when the CHR is mutated. Although E2f4 is part of the complex, a CDE is not essential but can enhance binding of DREAM. We show that the CHR element is not only necessary for repression of gene transcription in G0/G1, but also for activation in S, G2 and M phases. In proliferating cells, the B-myb-containing MMB complex binds the CHR of both promoters independently of the CDE. Bioinformatic analyses identify many genes which contain conserved CHR elements in promoters binding the DREAM complex. With Ube2c as an example from that screen, we show that inverse CHR sites are functional promoter elements that can bind DREAM and MMB. Our findings indicate that the CHR is central to DREAM/MMB-dependent transcriptional control during the cell cycle

    Identification of FAM111A as an SV40 Host Range Restriction and Adenovirus Helper Factor

    Get PDF
    The small genome of polyomaviruses encodes a limited number of proteins that are highly dependent on interactions with host cell proteins for efficient viral replication. The SV40 large T antigen (LT) contains several discrete functional domains including the LXCXE or RB-binding motif, the DNA binding and helicase domains that contribute to the viral life cycle. In addition, the LT C-terminal region contains the host range and adenovirus helper functions required for lytic infection in certain restrictive cell types. To understand how LT affects the host cell to facilitate viral replication, we expressed full-length or functional domains of LT in cells, identified interacting host proteins and carried out expression profiling. LT perturbed the expression of p53 target genes and subsets of cell-cycle dependent genes regulated by the DREAM and the B-Myb-MuvB complexes. Affinity purification of LT followed by mass spectrometry revealed a specific interaction between the LT C-terminal region and FAM111A, a previously uncharacterized protein. Depletion of FAM111A recapitulated the effects of heterologous expression of the LT C-terminal region, including increased viral gene expression and lytic infection of SV40 host range mutants and adenovirus replication in restrictive cells. FAM111A functions as a host range restriction factor that is specifically targeted by SV40 LT
    corecore