16 research outputs found

    Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy Measures for Managing Anxiety in a National Sample of Clinically Anxious Adults

    No full text
    Purpose: Anxiety is the most common and costly mental illness in the United States. Reducing avoidance is a core element of evidence-based treatments. Past research shows readiness to address avoidance affects outcomes. Investigating avoidance from a transtheoretical model (TTM) perspective could facilitate tailored approaches for individuals with low readiness. This study developed and examined psychometric properties of TTM measures for addressing anxiety-based avoidance. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Community centers, online survey. Participants: Five hundred ninety-four individuals aged 18 to 70 with clinically significant anxiety. Measures: Overall Anxiety Severity Questionnaire, stages of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy. Analysis: The sample was randomly split into halves for principal component analyses (PCAs) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) to test measurement models. Further analyses examined relationships between constructs. Results: For decisional balance, PCA indicated two 5-item factors (pros and cons). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 2-factor correlated model, Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square (XSB2[35]=80:82), comparative fit index (CFI = 0.94), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = 0.07), pros: α = 0.87, ρ = 0.87, cons: α = 0.75, and ρ = 0.75. For self-efficacy, PCA indicated one 6-item factor supported by CFA, XSB2(9)=30:39, P \u3c.01, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.09, α = 0.90, ρ = 0.87. As hypothesized, significant cross-stage differences were observed for pros and self-efficacy, and significant relationships between anxiety severity and pros, cons, and self-efficacy were found. Conclusion: Findings show strong psychometric properties and support the application of a readiness-based model to anxiety. In contrast to findings of other behaviors, cons remain high in action and maintenance. These measures provide a solid empirical foundation to develop TTM-tailored interventions to enhance engagement in treatment

    Child Abuse, Depression, and Methylation in Genes Involved With Stress, Neural Plasticity, and Brain Circuitry

    No full text
    Objectives: To determine whether epigenetic markers predict dimensional ratings of depression in maltreated children. Method: A genome-wide methylation study was completed using the Iliumina 450K BeadChip array in 94 maltreated and 96 healthy nontraumatized children with saliva-derived DNA. the 450K BeadChip does not include any methylation sites in the exact location as sites in candidate genes previously examined in the literature, so a test for replication of prior research findings was not feasible. Results: Methylation in 3 genes emerged as genome-wide-significant predictors of depression: DNA-Binding Protein Inhibitor ID-3 (ID3); Glutamate Receptor, Ionotropic N-methy1-D-aspartate (NMDA) 1 (GRIM); and Tubulin Polymerization Promoting Protein (TPPP) (p <5.0 x 10(-7), all analyses). These genes are all biologically relevant with ID3 involved in the stress response, GRIM involved in neural plasticity, and TPPP involved in neural circuitry development. Methylation in CpG sites in candidate genes were not predictors of depression at significance levels corrected for whole genome testing, but maltreated and control children did have significantly different 13 values after Bonferroni correction at multiple methylation sites in these candidate genes (e.g., BDNF, NR3C1, FKBP5). Conclusions: This study suggests that epigenetic changes in ID3, GRIN1, and TPPP genes, in combination with experiences of maltreatment, may confer risk for depression in children. the study adds to a growing body of literature supporting a role for epigenetic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of stress-related psychiatric disorders. Although epigenetic changes are frequently long lasting, they are not necessarily permanent. Consequently, interventions to reverse the negative biological and behavioral sequelae associated with child maltreatment are briefly discussed.Levy Foundation (N.W.)Brain Behavior Research (formerly NARSAD)Young Investigator award (B.-Z.Y)Yale Center (A.S)Conway family (A.S.)National Institutes of HealthYale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, LiNC, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Vermont, Vermont Ctr Children Youth & Families, Burlington, VT 05405 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, LiNC, São Paulo, BrazilNational Institutes of Health: T32 MH067763National Institutes of Health: K01 DA24758National Institutes of Health: DA022251National Institutes of Health: K99/R00DA022891National Institutes of Health: K23 MH01789National Institutes of Health: DA12849National Institutes of Health: DA12690National Institutes of Health: AA017535National Institutes of Health: AA11330R01National Institutes of Health: MH077087National Institutes of Health: MH65519National Institutes of Health: MH098073Web of Scienc

    Absence of behavioral sensitization in healthy human subjects following repeated exposure to ketamine.

    No full text
    RATIONALE: Sensitization to the effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonists is robust in animals. However, the applicability of this model to humans is unclear because it currently rests on highly confounded retrospective studies of individuals who experienced protracted psychoses following repeated binges with NMDA receptor antagonists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to determine whether there was evidence of sensitization to the behavioral effects of ketamine in healthy human subjects with repeated exposure to this drug. METHODS: Data were studied from 295 healthy human subjects who participated in one or more of 11 separate studies that involved ketamine administration over 14 years. Positive and negative symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: BPRS), perceptual alterations (Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale: CADSS), and high and anxiety states (Visual Analog Scale: VAS) that were measured in all studies were included as outcome measures. RESULTS: After including the number of previous exposures, number of previous studies, and time since first exposure as variables, repeated exposure to ketamine did not result in increased behavioral responses, suggestive of behavioral sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: The current data do not provide evidence that repeated exposure to ketamine, albeit limited, is associated with sensitization to the behavioral effects of ketamine
    corecore