16 research outputs found
Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy Measures for Managing Anxiety in a National Sample of Clinically Anxious Adults
Purpose: Anxiety is the most common and costly mental illness in the United States. Reducing avoidance is a core element of evidence-based treatments. Past research shows readiness to address avoidance affects outcomes. Investigating avoidance from a transtheoretical model (TTM) perspective could facilitate tailored approaches for individuals with low readiness. This study developed and examined psychometric properties of TTM measures for addressing anxiety-based avoidance. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Community centers, online survey. Participants: Five hundred ninety-four individuals aged 18 to 70 with clinically significant anxiety. Measures: Overall Anxiety Severity Questionnaire, stages of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy. Analysis: The sample was randomly split into halves for principal component analyses (PCAs) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) to test measurement models. Further analyses examined relationships between constructs. Results: For decisional balance, PCA indicated two 5-item factors (pros and cons). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 2-factor correlated model, Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square (XSB2[35]=80:82), comparative fit index (CFI = 0.94), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = 0.07), pros: α = 0.87, ρ = 0.87, cons: α = 0.75, and ρ = 0.75. For self-efficacy, PCA indicated one 6-item factor supported by CFA, XSB2(9)=30:39, P \u3c.01, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.09, α = 0.90, ρ = 0.87. As hypothesized, significant cross-stage differences were observed for pros and self-efficacy, and significant relationships between anxiety severity and pros, cons, and self-efficacy were found. Conclusion: Findings show strong psychometric properties and support the application of a readiness-based model to anxiety. In contrast to findings of other behaviors, cons remain high in action and maintenance. These measures provide a solid empirical foundation to develop TTM-tailored interventions to enhance engagement in treatment
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Hospitalized Adolescents: Psychiatric Comorbidity and Clinical Correlates
Recommended from our members
Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies
Background: Participant recruitment is an ongoing challenge in health research. Recruitment may be especially difficult for studies of access to health care because, even among those who are in care, people using services least often also may be hardest to contact and recruit. Opt-out recruitment methods (in which potential participants are given the opportunity to decline further contact about the study (opt out) following an initial mailing, and are then contacted directly if they have not opted out within a specified period) can be used for such studies. However, there is a dearth of literature on the effort needed for effective opt-out recruitment. Methods: In this paper we describe opt-out recruitment procedures for two studies on access to health care within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. We report resource requirements for recruitment efforts (number of opt-out packets mailed and number of phone calls made). We also compare the characteristics of study participants to potential participants via t-tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and chi-squared tests. Results: Recruitment rates for our two studies were 12 and 21%, respectively. Across multiple study sites, we had to send between 4.3 and 9.2 opt-out packets to recruit one participant. The number of phone calls required to arrive at a final status for each potentially eligible Veteran (i.e. study participation or the termination of recruitment efforts) were 2.9 and 6.1 in the two studies, respectively. Study participants differed as expected from the population of potentially eligible Veterans based on planned oversampling of certain subpopulations. The final samples of participants did not differ statistically from those who were mailed opt-out packets, with one exception: in one of our two studies, participants had higher rates of mental health service use in the past year than did those mailed opt-out packets (64 vs. 47%). Conclusions: Our results emphasize the practicality of using opt-out methods for studies of access to health care. Despite the benefits of these methods, opt-out alone may be insufficient to eliminate non-response bias on key variables. Researchers will need to balance considerations of sample representativeness and feasibility when designing studies investigating access to care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0333-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users
Child Abuse, Depression, and Methylation in Genes Involved With Stress, Neural Plasticity, and Brain Circuitry
Objectives: To determine whether epigenetic markers predict dimensional ratings of depression in maltreated children. Method: A genome-wide methylation study was completed using the Iliumina 450K BeadChip array in 94 maltreated and 96 healthy nontraumatized children with saliva-derived DNA. the 450K BeadChip does not include any methylation sites in the exact location as sites in candidate genes previously examined in the literature, so a test for replication of prior research findings was not feasible. Results: Methylation in 3 genes emerged as genome-wide-significant predictors of depression: DNA-Binding Protein Inhibitor ID-3 (ID3); Glutamate Receptor, Ionotropic N-methy1-D-aspartate (NMDA) 1 (GRIM); and Tubulin Polymerization Promoting Protein (TPPP) (p <5.0 x 10(-7), all analyses). These genes are all biologically relevant with ID3 involved in the stress response, GRIM involved in neural plasticity, and TPPP involved in neural circuitry development. Methylation in CpG sites in candidate genes were not predictors of depression at significance levels corrected for whole genome testing, but maltreated and control children did have significantly different 13 values after Bonferroni correction at multiple methylation sites in these candidate genes (e.g., BDNF, NR3C1, FKBP5). Conclusions: This study suggests that epigenetic changes in ID3, GRIN1, and TPPP genes, in combination with experiences of maltreatment, may confer risk for depression in children. the study adds to a growing body of literature supporting a role for epigenetic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of stress-related psychiatric disorders. Although epigenetic changes are frequently long lasting, they are not necessarily permanent. Consequently, interventions to reverse the negative biological and behavioral sequelae associated with child maltreatment are briefly discussed.Levy Foundation (N.W.)Brain Behavior Research (formerly NARSAD)Young Investigator award (B.-Z.Y)Yale Center (A.S)Conway family (A.S.)National Institutes of HealthYale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, LiNC, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Vermont, Vermont Ctr Children Youth & Families, Burlington, VT 05405 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, LiNC, São Paulo, BrazilNational Institutes of Health: T32 MH067763National Institutes of Health: K01 DA24758National Institutes of Health: DA022251National Institutes of Health: K99/R00DA022891National Institutes of Health: K23 MH01789National Institutes of Health: DA12849National Institutes of Health: DA12690National Institutes of Health: AA017535National Institutes of Health: AA11330R01National Institutes of Health: MH077087National Institutes of Health: MH65519National Institutes of Health: MH098073Web of Scienc
Additional file 1: of Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies
Opt-Out Letter (Access study). (DOCX 24 kb
Additional file 2: of Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies
Opt-Out Letter (Tailoring study). (DOCX 15 kb
Absence of behavioral sensitization in healthy human subjects following repeated exposure to ketamine.
RATIONALE: Sensitization to the effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonists is robust in animals. However, the applicability of this model to humans is unclear because it currently rests on highly confounded retrospective studies of individuals who experienced protracted psychoses following repeated binges with NMDA receptor antagonists.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to determine whether there was evidence of sensitization to the behavioral effects of ketamine in healthy human subjects with repeated exposure to this drug.
METHODS: Data were studied from 295 healthy human subjects who participated in one or more of 11 separate studies that involved ketamine administration over 14 years. Positive and negative symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: BPRS), perceptual alterations (Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale: CADSS), and high and anxiety states (Visual Analog Scale: VAS) that were measured in all studies were included as outcome measures.
RESULTS: After including the number of previous exposures, number of previous studies, and time since first exposure as variables, repeated exposure to ketamine did not result in increased behavioral responses, suggestive of behavioral sensitization.
CONCLUSIONS: The current data do not provide evidence that repeated exposure to ketamine, albeit limited, is associated with sensitization to the behavioral effects of ketamine