Murine De Novo Methyltransferase Dnmt3a Demonstrates Strand Asymmetry and Site Preference in the Methylation of DNA In Vitro

CpG methylation is involved in a wide range of biological processes in vertebrates as well as in plants and fungi. To date, three enzymes, Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b, are known to have DNA methyltransferase activity in mouse and human. It has been proposed that de novo methylation observed in early embryos is predominantly carried out by the Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b methyltransferases, while Dntm1 is believed to be responsible for maintaining the established methylation patterns upon replication. Analysis of the sites methylated in vivo using the bisulfite genomic sequencing method confirms the previous finding that some regions of the plasmid are much more methylated by Dnmt3a than other regions on the same plasmid. However, the preferred targets of the enzyme cannot be determined due to the presence of other methylases, DNA binding proteins, and chromatin structure. To discern the DNA targets of Dnmt3a without these compounding factors, sites methylated by Dnmt3a in vitro were analyzed. These analyses revealed that the two cDNA strands have distinctly different methylation patterns. Dnmt3a prefers CpG sites on a strand in which it is flanked by pyrimidines over CpG sites flanked by purines in vitro. These findings indicate that, unlike Dnmt1, Dnmt3a most likely methylates one strand of DNA without concurrent methylation of the CpG site on the complementary strand. These findings also indicate that Dnmt3a may methylate some CpG sites more frequently than others, depending on the sequence context. Methylation of each DNA strand independently and with possible sequence preference is a novel feature among the known DNA methyltransferases

A Genome Screen of Families with Multiple Cases of Prostate Cancer: Evidence of Genetic Heterogeneity

We conducted a genomewide screen for prostate cancer–susceptibility genes on the basis of data from 98 families from the United States and Canada that had three or more verified diagnoses of prostate cancer among first- and second-degree relatives. We found a statistically significant excess of markers for which affected relatives exhibited modest amounts of excess allele-sharing; however, no single chromosomal region contained markers with excess allele-sharing of sufficient magnitude to indicate unequivocal evidence of linkage. Positive linkage signals of nominal statistical significance were found in two regions (5p-q and 12p) that have been identified as weakly positive in other data sets and in region 19p, which has not been identified previously. All these signals were considerably stronger for analyses restricted to families with mean age at onset below the median than for analyses of families with mean age at onset above the median. The data provided little support for any of the putative prostate cancer–susceptibility genes identified in other linkage studies