Primeros registros de mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae) de la provincia de Misiones, Argentina

The following species represent first records for Argentina: Culex (Anoedioporpa) canaanensis Lane & Withman, Culex (Anoedioporpa) originator Gordon & Evans, Culex (Culex) declarator Dyar & Knab, Culex (Melanoconion) ribeirensis Forattini & Sallum, Culex (Microculex) neglectus Lutz, Culex (Microculex) pleuristriatus Theobald, Orthopodomyia fascipes (Coquillett) and Wyeomyia (Wyeomyia) medioalbipes Lutz. The species Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) guarani Shannon and Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) rhyacophilus (Da Costa Lima), recorded for Argentina, were recently resurrected from the synonymy of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) lutzii Cruz and Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) scapularis (Rondani). The following species represent the first report for Misiones Province: Anopheles (Anopheles) neomaculipalpus Curry, Coquillettidia (Rhynchotaenia) fasciolata (Lynch Arribálzaga), Culex (Culex) acharistus Root, Culex (Culex) tatoi Casal & García, Culex (Culex) usquatus Dyar. With these new records the number of mosquito species for Misiones Province increases to 189 while for Argentina to 242.Las siguientes especies representan el primer registro de la Argentina: Culex (Anoedioporpa) canaanensis Lane & Withman, Culex (Anoedioporpa) originator Gordon & Evans, Culex (Culex) declarator Dyar & Knab, Culex (Melanoconion) ribeirensis Forattini & Sallum, Culex (Microculex) neglectus Lutz, Culex (Microculex) pleuristriatus Lutz, Orthopodomyia fascipes Coquillett y Wyeomyia (Wyeomyia) medioalbipes Lutz. Las especies Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) guarani Shannon y Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) rhyacophilus (Da Costa Lima) fueron recientemente rescatadas de la sinonimia de Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) lutzii Cruz y Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) scapularis (Rondani). Las siguientes especies corresponden a nuevos registros de la provincia de Misiones: Anopheles (Anopheles) neomaculipalpus Curry, Coquillettidia (Rhynchotaenia) fasciolata (Lynch Arribalzaga), Culex (Culex) acharistus Root, Culex (Culex) tatoi Casal & García, Culex (Culex) usquatus Dyar y Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) guadeloupensis (Dyar & Knab). Con estos nuevos registros el número de especies citadas se eleva a 189 de la provincia de Misiones y 242 de Argentina.Fil: Rossi, Gustavo Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (i); ArgentinaFil: Lestani, Eduardo Ariel. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional de Medicina Tropical; Argentin

Incipient loss of flagella in the genus Geolegnia: the emergence of a new clade within Leptolegnia?

The genus Geolegnia represents a poorly documented group of saprolegnialean oomycetes isolated from soils as free-living organisms. Although it is morphologically similar to the facultative parasitic genus Leptolegnia, Geolegnia presents the uncommon property of having lost a flagellate stage in its lifecycle. Based on ITS and large subunit (LSU) rRNA sequence data, we show Geolegnia to be basal to Leptolegnia, and also introduce Geolegnia helicoides sp. nov. Using sequence data of Leptolegnia available in GenBank, supplemented by data derived from culture collections, we show that Geolegnia is nested within Leptolegnia, a genus characterised by its “conventional” biflagellate life cycle. The emergence of Geolegnia is therefore seen as a recent event, and we suggest here an evolutionary context where this loss might have been advantageous. Based on this study, Leptolegnia remains paraphyletic, awaiting the redefinition of genera in this complex.Instituto de Botánica "Dr. Carlos Spegazzini"Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectore

Building a Species Conservation Strategy for the brown howler monkey (Alouatta guariba clamitans) in Argentina in the context of yellow fever outbreaks

El mono aullador marrón (Alouatta guariba clamitans) es endémico del Bosque Atlántico de América del Sur, con una pequeña población que se extiende en la porción norte de la provincia de Misiones en el noreste de Argentina. En el año 2012, debido a su reducida distribución geográfica, su baja densidad poblacional y al dramático impacto de los recientes brotes de Fiebre Amarilla, la especie fue categorizada en Argentina como “en peligro crítico”. En el mes de marzo de 2013 organizamos un taller internacional en Misiones con el objetivo de evaluar el estado de la población de esta especie en Argentina y llevar a cabo un análisis de las principales amenazas para su conservación. Para alcanzar estos objetivos construimos modelos de viabilidad poblacional utilizando los programas Vortex y Outbreak. Los mismos nos permitieron explorar cómo varios parámetros biológicos y demográficos de la especie, así como diversos factores relacionados al impacto de la Fiebre Amarilla, influyen sobre la probabilidad de extinción de la especie. La discusión entre los distintos especialistas y el análisis de los resultados de los modelos identificaron a la Fiebre Amarilla como la principal amenaza para la subsistencia de esta población en Argentina. El análisis de las amenazas se centró en la dinámica de los brotes de Fiebre Amarilla y la severidad de su impacto sobre la población de esta especie, lo que permitió identificar huecos en el conocimiento que permitieron priorizar objetivos y acciones a llevar a cabo para el desarrollo de una estrategia de conservación para esta especie en Argentina.The brown howler monkey (Alouatta guariba clamitans) is endemic to South America’s Atlantic Forest, with a small population extending into the northern portion of Misiones province in northeastern Argentina. In 2012, the species was classified as Critically Endangered in Argentina due to its highly restricted distribution, low population density and dramatic declines from recent Yellow Fever outbreaks. In March 2013, we organized an international workshop in Misiones to evaluate population status in Argentina and conduct a threat analysis. We developed population viability models using Vortex and Outbreak software packages. These tools allowed us to explore how several biological and demographic parameters of brown howlers, as well as factors related to Yellow Fever epidemiology, affect the probability of species extinction. The discussion among diverse specialists and analysis of model results identified Yellow Fever as the main threat to brown howler population persistence in Argentina. Our threat analysis, focused on the dynamics of Yellow Fever outbreaks and their impact on howler populations, led to the identification of gaps in knowledge that helped prioritize objectives and actions for the development of a Species Conservation Strategy in Argentina.Fil: Agostini, Ilaria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlantico; ArgentinaFil: Holzmann, Ingrid. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlantico; ArgentinaFil: Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlantico; ArgentinaFil: Oklander, Luciana Inés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlantico; ArgentinaFil: Kowalewski, Miguel Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia". Estación Biológica de Usos Multiples (sede Corrientes); ArgentinaFil: Beldomenico, Pablo Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Cs.veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Goenaga, S.. Dirección Nacional de Instituto de Investigación. Adm.nacional de Laboratorio E Instituto de Salud "dr.c.g.malbran". Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Virales Humanas; ArgentinaFil: Martínez, Mariela Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical; Argentina. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional de Medicina Tropical; ArgentinaFil: Moreno, Eduardo S.. Ministerio da Saude; BrasilFil: Lestani, Eduardo. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional de Medicina Tropical; ArgentinaFil: Desbiez, Arnaud L. J.. Royal Zoological Society of Scotland; Reino Unido. Conservation Breeding Specialist Group; Estados UnidosFil: Miller, Philip. Conservation Breeding Specialist Group; Estados Unido

Parasitism by Tylenchid Nematodes in Natural Populations of Pintomyia fischeri (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in Argentina

Pintomyia fischeri adults collected in different eco-epidemiological studies in the northeastern of Argentina were found parasitized by juvenile nematodes (Tylenchida) isolated from the body cavity. The percentage of infected females and males was 3.8% and 2.9% respectively. Part of the life cycle of sand flies and tylenchid nematodes take place in humid and dark sites, where infection of immature stage of Phlebotominae insects is possible. Biology of this parasite could help to determine the breeding sites of sand flies. This study constituted the first report of tylenchid nematodes infecting sand flies at field conditions in South-America.Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectore

Tecnologías ganaderas en rodeos de cría del este del Chaco, Argentina

Es cada vez mayor el interés por mejorar los parámetros productivos de la ganadería bovina, para lo que resulta imprescindible identificar los problemas que dificultan la adopción de las tecnologías que permiten incrementar su productividad. Esta publicación contiene la información relevada, sistematizada y analizada proveniente de encuestas realizadas a productores en el área de influencia de la EEA Colonia Benítez de INTA, ubicada en el este de la provincia del Chaco. El relevamiento se realizó de forma simultánea en las Agencias de Extensión Rural de Las Palmas, Basail, Makallé y en la Oficina de Colonia Benítez con la participación de distintos estratos de productores. Se evaluaron tecnologías relacionadas al manejo del rodeo, reproducción, sanidad, nutrición, bienestar animal, así como la gestión integral de la empresa ganadera. Los resultados logrados se presentan de manera ordenada definiendo las tecnologías consultadas, los valores obtenidos en cada estrato de productores, junto a relatos breves en primera persona del “conocimiento y uso” de las tecnologías analizadas. La información resulta de utilidad para construir propuestas de intervención teniendo en cuenta.EEA Colonia BenítezFil: Verdoljak, Juan Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Gomez, Viviana Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Rossner, Maria Victoria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Pellerano, Liliana Laura. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez; ArgentinaFil: Famin, Lucia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez. Agencia de Extensión Rural Las Palmas; ArgentinaFil: Vagabculov, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Monteros, Diego Ezequiel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Lestani Sablich, Mariano. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez. Agencia de Extensión Rural Makallé; ArgentinaFil: Geijo, Angel Ruben. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez. Agencia de Extensión Rural Basail; ArgentinaFil: Fernandez, Abel Leopoldo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez. Agencia de Extensión Rural Las Palmas; ArgentinaFil: Pamies, Marcelo Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez; ArgentinaFil: Monicault, Luis Ademar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Davalos, Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez. Agencia de Extensión Rural Basail; ArgentinaFil: Saez, Roberto Alonso. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Vagabculow, Jorge Leandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez. Agencia de Extensión Rural Las Palmas; ArgentinaFil: Di Lorenzo, Elio Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; ArgentinaFil: Rosello Brajovich, José Emilio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez; Argentin

New records of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from Misiones Province, Argentina

Las siguientes especies representan el primer registro de la Argentina: Culex (Anoedioporpa) canaanensis Lane & Withman, Culex (Anoedioporpa) originator Gordon & Evans, Culex (Culex) declarator Dyar & Knab, Culex (Melanoconion) ribeirensis Forattini & Sallum, Culex (Microculex) neglectus Lutz, Culex (Microculex) pleuristriatus Lutz, Orthopodomyia fascipes Coquillett y Wyeomyia (Wyeomyia) medioalbipes Lutz. Las especies Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) guarani Shannon y Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) rhyacophilus (Da Costa Lima) fueron recientemente rescatadas de la sinonimia de Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) lutzii Cruz y Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) scapularis (Rondani). Las siguientes especies corresponden a nuevos registros de la provincia de Misiones: Anopheles (Anopheles) neomaculipalpus Curry, Coquillettidia (Rhynchotaenia) fasciolata (Lynch Arribalzaga), Culex (Culex) acharistus Root, Culex (Culex) tatoi Casal & García, Culex (Culex) usquatus Dyar y Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) guadeloupensis (Dyar & Knab). Con estos nuevos registros el número de especies citadas se eleva a 189 de la provincia de Misiones y 242 de Argentina

Culex (Melanoconion) bahiensis Duret 1969

<i>Culex (Melanoconion) bahiensis</i> Duret, 1969, M, MG* <p> FEMALE. Small mosquito with dark brownish scales. <i>Head</i>: Antenna dark, length 1.6 – 1.7 mm. Maxillary palpus dark-scaled, length 0.25 mm. Vertex with narrow decumbent scales from the coronal suture to the posterolateral area; broad spatulate scales, these grey laterally and dorsally, restricted to sides of eyes; forked scales brown. Proboscis dark-scaled, labella slightly pale, length 1.6–1.7 mm. <i>Cibarial armature</i>: Cibarial bar broad, concave; Cibarial teeth as figured (Fig. 1 A). <i>Thorax</i>: Integument dark brown. Scutum with fine falcate scales with pale golden reflections, except on lateral scutal fossa, anterior promontory and lateral prescutellar area where the scales are whitish. Complete row of dorsocentral setae, strong, black; acrostichal setae absent. Median lobe of scutellum with whitish falcate scales, lateral lobes with few scales of the same type. Scutellar scales whitish, with 3 or 4 long and 3 short setae on each lateral lobe and 6 long and 4 short ones on midlobe. Pleura concolorous with scutum. Small spots of whitish scales only on upper mesokatepisternum, mixed with setae on lower mesokatepisternum. Postpronotum with few scales, with 3 dark setae on posterodorsal margin. Few whitish scales on lower prealar area and 7 whitish scales on lower mesokatepisternum. Pleural setae as follows: 8–10 antepronotal, 7 or 8 upper proepisternal, 4–6 prealar, 6 or 7 lower mesokatepisternal and 1 lower mesepimeral. <i>Wing</i> (n=2): Length 3.12–3.20 mm, vein R 2 0.85–0.87 mm, vein R3 0.45–0.50 mm. <i>Halter</i>: Scabellum and ventral portion of pedicel pale. Capitellum and dorsal portion of pedicel dark. <i>Legs</i>: Anterior surface of coxa darker, yellowish posteriorly. Fore- and midcoxae with row of dark scales anteriorly. Femora mainly dark-scaled; fore- and midfemora whitish on posterior surfaces diluted toward apex; hindfemur with whitish ventral surface. Tibiae dark-scaled; tarsi dark-scaled, tarsomeres with basal rings of translucent brown scales. <i>Abdomen</i>: Tergum II dark-scaled dorsally, with pale basolateral spots, terga III–VI dark-scaled, dorsally with broad basal pale band joined to basolateral spots, terga VII and VIII dark-scaled dorsally, with pale basolateral spots. Sterna II–VII with basal band of cream-colored scales. Abdominal setae golden.</p> <p> MALE: Like female except for sexual and following differences. Antenna strongly verticillate, length 1.5–1.8 mm (mean = 1.63 mm). Proboscis dark-scaled, length 1.6–2.0 mm (mean 1.81 mm), false joint about 0.6 from base. Maxillary palpus dark-scaled, length 2.2–2.6 mm (mean = 2.4 mm), extending beyond apex of proboscis from middle of penultimate palpomere. Vertex with yellowish forked scales. <i>Thorax</i>: Integument brownish, with sparse whitish falcate scales of uniform size and color except whitish on anterior and lateral margins. <i>Abdomen</i>: Tergum II dark or with few white scales on basolateral areas, III–VI with broad basal bands of white scales joined to basolateral spots, VII and VIII with basolateral pale spots that sometimes join in middle. Sterna dark-scaled, sterna II–VII with broad basal bands of white scales, sternum VIII dark-scaled. <i>Genitalia</i> (Figs. 1 B, 2): Gonocoxite conical, mesal side concave, inner side slightly convex; ventrolateral setae strongly developed, mesal surface with short, sparse setae. Subapical lobe with 2 divisions. Proximal division scarcely longer than distal, with arm as long as 2 setae (<i>a</i>, <i>b</i>); both setae sinuous apically, basal seta shorter (83.5 µm) than distal (86.8 µm). Distal division ending in 2 short arms, basal division with long apically hooked seta (<i>h</i>,), 1 short and 1 long and flat saber-like seta (<i>s</i>) and 1 narrow lanceolate flat seta (<i>l</i>). Distal arm curved, with 4 narrow appressed flat setae (<i>f</i>) of nearly same length; a slender seta born at middle of distal division of subapical lobe. <i>Gonostylus</i>: Slender, curved and widened distally on lateral side, with 2 setae, and conspicuous saw blade-like subapical crest before apical snout; gonostylar claw short, broad. <i>Phallosome</i>: Aedeagal sclerite narrow, slightly curved. Lateral plate with apical process bifurcate at tip, long, narrow, projecting caudally, ventral process basal in position, upper point of tip pointed and slightly curved. <i>Tergum IX</i>: Lobes ovoid, with short setae except laterally.</p> <p> PUPA (Fig. 2): Chaetotaxy as figured; range and modal number of branches in Table 1. <i>Cephalothorax</i>: Lightly and unevenly tanned, legs and metathorax darker. Setae 1–3-CT usually with 2 (1,2) branches; 5-CT double; 4,6,7,9,11-CT always single; 8-CT double, rarely triple, 10-CT usually with 4 (3–6) branches, 11,12-CT similar, 11-CT stronger, 12-CT usually single (1,2). <i>Trumpet</i>: Moderately tanned, slender, nearly cylindrical, length 0.51–0.59 mm (mean = 0.56 mm), index 8.3–9.2 (mean 8.6 mm), pinna 0.09–0.12 mm (mean 0.1 mm), meatus with short slit. <i>Abdomen</i>: Lightly tanned, anterior margin of terga II–IV darker, length 2.20–2.60 mm (mean = 2.37 mm). Setae 1-II–VII multiple, of same length except 1-VII shorter; 3-II,VI,VII single, 3-III usually single (1–3), 3- IV usually triple (1–3), 3-V single, occasionally double. <i>Paddle</i>: Lightly tanned, length 0.68–0.78 mm (mean 0.72 mm), width 0.38–0.46 mm (mean = 0.41 mm), midrib and buttress smooth, midrib incomplete apically, buttress developed only at base, margins smooth. Setae 1,2-P single, 2-P 0.3 length of 1-P.</p> <p> LARVA (Fig. 3): Chaetotaxy as figured; range and modal number of branches in Table 2. <i>Head</i>: Wider than long, length 0.62–0.65 mm (mean 0.63 mm), width 1.0– 1.1 mm (mean= 1.05 mm) when measured without coverslip and length 0.77–0.87 and width 1.00–1.20 when examined with coverslip. Moderately tanned, posterior part of dorsal apotome and area behind compound eye lightly tanned. Median labral plate with concave margin between insertions of seta 1-C. Hypostomal suture complete, collar poorly developed, tanned. Dorsomentum usually with 6 teeth on either side of broad median tooth. Seta 1-C spiniform, dark; 2,3-C absent; 4-C short, single; 5-C usually double (1–3); 6-C long, single; 9–10-C similar in length; 8,9-C branched, 8-C shorter than 9-C; 11-C triple; 12-C usually double (2–4); 13-C usually triple (2,3). <i>Antenna</i>: Length 0.61–0.65 mm (mean 0.63 mm), tanned, with conspicuous spicules, distal part aciculate laterally. Seta 1-A inserted 0.68 from base (0.66–0.75), with 24 (22–26) branches. <i>Thorax</i>: Integument hyaline, covered with spicules (10 µm) on dorsal and ventral surfaces, large setae 1–3-P and 9–12-P,M,T inserted on common tubercles; seta 1-P usually single (1–4), 2-P single, very long; 3-P about 0.15 length of 1,2-P, usually with 3 (1–4) branches; 4,7-P usually double (1,2 and 1–3, respectively); 8-P usually single (1,2). Seta 1-M usually double (1–4); 2-M single. Seta 13-T usually triple (3,4). <i>Abdomen</i>: Integument hyaline, with shorter spicules (approximately 5 µm) than those on thorax on both sides; seta 6-I–VI double but 6-III occasionally triple; 7-II–VI usually 4- or 5-branched. <i>Segment VIII</i>: Comb with 49–62 moderately long scales, scales fringed on sides and apex, apical fringe distinct, lateral fringe inconspicuous, scales arranged in 3 or 4 irregular rows. <i>Siphon</i>: Length 1.2–1.3 mm (mean = 1.24), index 6.3–7.6 (mean = 7, width measured at base), pecten with 13–21 spines (mean = 16) increasing in size from base, ventral edge of spines with complete row of close-set denticles. Seta 1-S in 7 pairs, 5 posterolateral pairs with 2–5 branches and nearly twice as long as width of siphon at point of insertion; dorsolateral pairs with 1 or 2 short branches; seta 2-S hooked, inserted in membrane, bent ventrally with slender curved submedian accessory branch. <i>Segment X</i>: Saddle complete, with small spines forming a conspicuous spot and 7 spines extending beyond caudal border, length 0.31–0.35 mm (mean 0.32), siphon-saddle index 3.5–3.9 (mean 3.7). Seta 1-X usually triple (2–4); 2-X with one long and one short branch; 3-X long, single; 4-X usually in 6 pairs, 4a-X usually with 6 branches, most anterior seta triple. Anal papillae long, approximately twice saddle length.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> <i>Culex bahiensis</i> is presently assigned to the Distinguendus Group of the Melanoconion Section of Sirivanakarn (1983). The species is readily identified as a member of the Putumayensis Subgroup of the Distinguendus Group by means of Sirivanakarn's key for the male genitalia.</p> <p> The choice of which subgroup the species should be placed in, however, is difficult. According to Sirivanakarn's key to females, and because of the presence of a patch of scales on the upper corner of the mesokatepisternum, the species should be included in the Distinguendus Subgroup. Sirivanakarn's key separates pupae of the Distinguendus and Putumayensis Subgroups according to seta 9-VIII with either 4 or 5,6 branches, but <i>Cx</i>. <i>bahiensis</i> has only two branches.</p> <p> Siphon length of 1.5–2.0 mm is used in Sirivanakarn's key to separate larvae of two of the five subgroups of the Distinguendus Group. These are the Distinguendus and Putumayensis Subgroups. Since the siphon of <i>Cx. bahiensis</i> is 1.2–1.3 mm in length, the species does not belong to the Distinguendus Subgroup. In contrast, because larvae of the Putumayensis Subgroup are distinguished from those of the Distinguendus Subgroup by the length of the seta 1-S, which is greater than the width of the siphon at the point of insertion, <i>Cx</i>. <i>bahiensis</i> should be placed in the Putumayensis Subgroup. Moreover, seta 7-I is double in <i>Cx. bahiensis</i>.</p> <p> The larva of <i>Cx</i>. <i>bahiensis</i> differs from that of <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i> in having seta 4-C single and conspicuous as opposed to multiple and small as in <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i>; setae 11–13-C have 2 or 3 branches instead of multiple branches as in <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i>; setae 5,7-M are simple in <i>Cx</i>. <i>bahiensis</i> whereas 5,7-M are spiculose in <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i>; and finally 49–62 comb scales are present on segment VIII instead of 41–45 as in <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i>.</p> <p> Seta 6-CT of the pupa of <i>Cx</i>. <i>bahiensis</i> is single, but that of <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i> usually has 6 branches; seta 10- CT has 3 or 4 branches as opposed to 14–16 branches in <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i>; seta 9-VII is single whereas it has 3 branches in <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i>; and finally, seta 9-VIII is double, not triple as in <i>Cx</i>. <i>putumayensis</i>.</p> <p> The female of the <i>Cx. bahiensis</i> has a patch of scales on the upper corner of the mesokatepisternum, which is absent in <i>Cx. putumayensis</i> and <i>Cx. distinguendus</i>. Because the female, pupa, and larva of <i>Cx. bahiensis</i> have features common to both subgroups (Distinguendus and Putumayensis), the question of the taxonomic placement of this species requires further investigation.</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> Eleven larvae and 5 pupae were collected in a puddle located 50 m from the Salto Arrechea waterfall and approximately 200 m from the Iguazú River (25º 39' 18.51'' S; 54º 27' 26.61'' W). The following specimens were obtained from rearing: 5 M, 3 MG, 2 F, 6 Pe, 2 Le, 9 L.</p> <p> <b>Bionomics.</b> All specimens examined were collected as larvae and pupae from a puddle formed by rain on basalt soil. The puddle was in a shadowy under story of native forest that is usually very humid due to a small waterfall nearby. The larvae were found in association with <i>Ochlerotatus crinifer</i> (Theobald), <i>Ochlerotatus serratus</i> (Theobald), and <i>Cx. dolosus</i> (Lynch Arribálzaga).</p>Published as part of <i>Lestani, Eduardo A. & Rossi, Gustavo C., 2012, Description of the female, pupa, and larva of Culex (Melanoconion) bahiensis Duret, and redescription of the male (Diptera: Culicidae), pp. 57-63 in Zootaxa 3323</i> on pages 58-63, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/208772">10.5281/zenodo.208772</a&gt

Nuevos registros y distribución de mosquitos de la Argentina (Diptera: Culicidae) New records and distribution of mosquitoes from Argentina (Diptera: Culicidae)

Se presentan 21 nuevos registros de especies y se amplía la distribución de otras 12 especies de los géneros Anopheles Meigen, Coquillettidia Dyar, Culex L., Haemagogus Williston, Ochlerotatus Lynch Arribalzaga, Onirion Harbach y Peyton, Orthopodomyia Theobald, Psorophora Robineau-Desvoidy, Sabethes Robineau-Desvoidy, Stegomyia Theobald, Toxorhynchites Theobald. Se incluyen comentarios y cambios de estatus para especies de Howardina Theobald, Ochlerotatus y Lutzia (Theobald). Actualmente, en la Argentina se hallan presentes 226 especies distribuidas en 23 géneros.<br>Twenty one new records and 12 new distributional records of species of the genus Anopheles Meigen, Coquillettidia Dyar, Culex L., Haemagogus Williston, Ochlerotatus Lynch Arribalzaga, Onirion Harbach & Peyton, Orthopodomyia Theobald, Psorophora Robineau-Desvoidy, Sabethes Robineau-Desvoidy, Stegomyia Theobald, Toxorhynchites Theobald are reported. Comments and changes in the status of species of Howardina Theobald, Ochelrotatus and Lutzia Theobald are included. Currently, in Argentina are present 226 species distributed in 23 genera