8 research outputs found

    Aplikasi Konsep Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) dengan Social Web

    Full text link
    This study discusses the impact of social media to the development of personal knowledge management (PKM). Here the author describeS the factual condition of the company that useS social media as a means of personal knowledge management. Furthermore, these interaction patterns have significant impact on the organization. The purpose of this article is to analyze the application of personal knowledge managementconcept, combined with the social media concept that focuses on social networks with the consideration that they are widespreadly used by the public. Plus the emergence of social networking sites are increasingly new added value to the development of social media. The method used is literature study obtained from the online journals, articles and text books. The result of this study is expected to expand the use of social networking as a means of personal knowledge management in the organization

    Sub-intervals of time to defibrillation.

    No full text
    <p>The scenario starts with initially addressing the patient (left) and ends with delivering the shock (right). Proportions of the diagram do not represent actual values.</p

    Factors associated with delayed defibrillation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A prospective simulation study

    No full text
    <div><p>Introduction</p><p>Early defibrillation is an important factor of survival in cardiac arrest. However, novice resuscitators often struggle with cardiac arrest patients. We investigated factors leading to delayed defibrillation performed by final-year medical students within a simulated bystander cardiac arrest situation.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Final-year medical students received a refresher lecture and basic life support training before being confronted with a simulated cardiac arrest situation in a simulation ambulance. The scenario was analyzed for factors leading to delayed defibrillation. We compared the time intervals the participants needed for various measures with a benchmark set by experienced resuscitators. After training, the participants were interviewed regarding challenges and thoughts during the scenario.</p><p>Results</p><p>The median time needed for defibrillation was 158 s (n = 49, interquartile range: 107–270 s), more than six-fold of the benchmark time. The major part of total defibrillation time (49%; median, n = 49) was between onset of ventricular fibrillation and beginning to prepare the defibrillator, more specifically the time between end of preparation of the defibrillator and actual delivery of the shock, with a mean proportion of 26% (n = 49, SD = 17%) of the overall time needed for defibrillation (maximum 67%). Self-reported reasons for this delay included uncertainty about the next step to take, as reported by 73% of the participants. A total of 35% were unsure about which algorithm to follow. Diagnosing the patient was subjectively difficult for 35% of the participants. Overall, 53% of the participants felt generally confused.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Our study shows that novice resuscitators rarely achieve guideline-recommended defibrillation times. The most relative delays were observed when participants had to choose what to do next or which algorithm to follow, and thus i.e. performed extensive airway management before a life-saving defibrillation. Our data provides a first insight in the process of defibrillation delay and can be used to generate new hypotheses on how to provide a timely defibrillation.</p></div

    Factors associated with delayed defibrillation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A prospective simulation study - Fig 3

    No full text
    <p><b>A:</b> Time needed for the first defibrillation after onset of ventricular fibrillation (n = 49). <b>B:</b> Stacked-bar summary of critical intervals between the onset of ventricular fibrillation and the first defibrillation. Minimal accomplishable time (25 s, determined in-house by experienced personnel) and median values of the study population are shown in the top rows for comparison.</p
    corecore