The development of the GSFC DORIS contribution to ITRF2014

AbstractThe NASA GSFC DORIS analysis center has processed data from January 1993 to December 2014 and provided 1141 weekly solutions in the form of normal equations for incorporation into the DORIS solution for ITRF2014. The solution time series, designated as gscwd26, were based on tracking data to eleven DORIS satellites divided generally into seven-day arcs. With respect to the ITRF2008 submission (Le Bail et al., 2010), the measurement model was updated to model the beacon frequency variations at certain DORIS sites, to apply the DORIS antenna phase law for the Starec and Alcatel antennae, and to apply the antenna offset corrections in the NASA GSFC orbit determination software rather than using the data-supplied corrections. We show that computing the antenna offset corrections in the orbit determination software is superior to using the offset corrections that are supplied with the DORIS data, and that this improves the RMS of fit for SPOT-2, Envisat, SPOT-4, and SPOT-5. The updates for the force model included: (1) the development of improved nonconservative force modeling for SPOT-2, SPOT-3, SPOT-5, Envisat, and HY-2A, and (2) the application of an updated static gravity model based on GRACE and GOCE data, and weekly models of the variations in the low degree gravity field deduced independently from tracking by Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) and DORIS. The post-ITRF2008 DORIS coordinate WRMS after the launch of Envisat and SPOT-5 is improved from 11.20 to 12.45mm with ITRF2008 (Le Bail et al., 2010), to between 8.50 and 9.99mm with the gscwd26 SINEX solution. The application of the DORIS antenna phase laws shifts the DORIS scale wrt DPOD2008 by +6.0mm from 1993/01/03 to 2002/06/06, and by +11.4mm from 2002/06/13 to 2011/10/30. The application of more detailed models of time-variable gravity reduces the slopes in the Helmert transformation parameters Tx, and Ty (w.r.t. DPOD2008) after 2005. The annual amplitude in these parameters is reduced from 3.2mm (for Tx), 4.1mm (for Ty), to 1.7mm (for Tx) and 2.8mm (for Ty)

Towards development of a consistent orbit series for TOPEX, Jason-1, and Jason-2

International audienc

Global change effects on plant communities are magnified by time and the number of global change factors imposed

Global change drivers (GCDs) are expected to alter community structure and consequently, the services that ecosystems provide. Yet, few experimental investigations have examined effects of GCDs on plant community structure across multiple ecosystem types, and those that do exist present conflicting patterns. In an unprecedented global synthesis of over 100 experiments that manipulated factors linked to GCDs, we show that herbaceous plant community responses depend on experimental manipulation length and number of factors manipulated. We found that plant communities are fairly resistant to experimentally manipulated GCDs in the short term (<10 y). In contrast, long-term (?10 y) experiments show increasing community divergence of treatments from control conditions. Surprisingly, these community responses occurred with similar frequency across the GCD types manipulated in our database. However, community responses were more common when 3 or more GCDs were simultaneously manipulated, suggesting the emergence of additive or synergistic effects of multiple drivers, particularly over long time periods. In half of the cases, GCD manipulations caused a difference in community composition without a corresponding species richness difference, indicating that species reordering or replacement is an important mechanism of community responses to GCDs and should be given greater consideration when examining consequences of GCDs for the biodiversity.ecosystem function relationship. Human activities are currently driving unparalleled global changes worldwide. Our analyses provide the most comprehensive evidence to date that these human activities may have widespread impacts on plant community composition globally, which will increase in frequency over time and be greater in areas where communities face multiple GCDs simultaneously. - 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This work was conducted as a part of a Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Synthesis Group funded by NSF Grants EF-0553768 and DEB#1545288 through the LTER Network Communications Office and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara. M.L.A. was supported by a fellowship from the Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), which also provided computing support. SESYNC is funded by NSF Grant DBI-1052875. Funding for individual experiments included in this analysis can be found in SI Appendix, section 7.Scopu