Innovation across cultures: Connecting leadership, identification, and creative behavior in organizations

Innovation is considered essential for today's organizations to survive and thrive. Researchers have also stressed the importance of leadership as a driver of followers' innovative work behavior (FIB). Yet, despite a large amount of research, three areas remain understudied: (a) The relative importance of different forms of leadership for FIB; (b) the mechanisms through which leadership impacts FIB; and (c) the degree to which relationships between leadership and FIB are generalizable across cultures. To address these lacunae, we propose an integrated model connecting four types of positive leadership behaviors, two types of identification (as mediating variables), and FIB. We tested our model in a global data set comprising responses of N = 7,225 participants from 23 countries, grouped into nine cultural clusters. Our results indicate that perceived LMX quality was the strongest relative predictor of FIB. Furthermore, the relationships between both perceived LMX quality and identity leadership with FIB were mediated by social identification. The indirect effect of LMX on FIB via social identification was stable across clusters, whereas the indirect effects of the other forms of leadership on FIB via social identification were stronger in countries high versus low on collectivism. Power distance did not influence the relations

Political leaders' identity leadership and civic citizenship behavior:The mediating role of trust in fellow citizens and the moderating role of economic inequality

Identity leadership captures leaders efforts to create and promote a sense of shared group membership (i.e., a sense of “we” and of “us”) among followers. The present research report tests this claim by drawing on data from 26 countries that are part of the Global Identity Leadership Development (GILD) project to examine the relationship between political leaders' identity leadership and civic citizenship behavior (N = 6787). It also examines the contributions of trust and economic inequality to this relationship. Political leaders' identity leadership (PLIL) was positively associated with respondents' people-oriented civic citizenship behaviors (CCB-P) in 20 of 26 countries and civic citizenship behaviors aimed at one's country (CCB-C) in 23 of 26 countries. Mediational analyses also confirmed the indirect effects of PLIL via trust in fellow citizens on both CCB-P (in 25 out of 26 countries) and CCB-C (in all 26 countries). Economic inequality moderated these effects such that the main and indirect effects of trust in one's fellow citizens on CCB-C were stronger in countries with higher economic inequality. This interaction effect was not observed for CCB-P. The study highlights the importance of identity leadership and trust in fellow citizens in promoting civic citizenship behavior, especially in the context of economic inequality.</p

Political leaders' identity leadership and civic citizenship behavior:The mediating role of trust in fellow citizens and the moderating role of economic inequality

Identity leadership captures leaders efforts to create and promote a sense of shared group membership (i.e., a sense of “we” and of “us”) among followers. The present research report tests this claim by drawing on data from 26 countries that are part of the Global Identity Leadership Development (GILD) project to examine the relationship between political leaders' identity leadership and civic citizenship behavior (N = 6787). It also examines the contributions of trust and economic inequality to this relationship. Political leaders' identity leadership (PLIL) was positively associated with respondents' people-oriented civic citizenship behaviors (CCB-P) in 20 of 26 countries and civic citizenship behaviors aimed at one's country (CCB-C) in 23 of 26 countries. Mediational analyses also confirmed the indirect effects of PLIL via trust in fellow citizens on both CCB-P (in 25 out of 26 countries) and CCB-C (in all 26 countries). Economic inequality moderated these effects such that the main and indirect effects of trust in one's fellow citizens on CCB-C were stronger in countries with higher economic inequality. This interaction effect was not observed for CCB-P. The study highlights the importance of identity leadership and trust in fellow citizens in promoting civic citizenship behavior, especially in the context of economic inequality.</p

How is the economic crisis socially assessed?

Based on the Social Representation Theory, the purpose of this article is to explore how lay-people consider both the economic crisis and risk, and to link these social representations to behavior. The article offers an original approach with the articulation of two studies about the social construction of risk and crises. It also contributes to the development of research methods for studying the connections between representations and practical implications. Based on this, the impact of the social representation of the crisis on the perceived ability to act is approached. The first study focuses on free-association tasks, with two distinct target terms: ‘risk’ and ‘crisis’. The structural approach, with a prototypical analysis, allowed the identification of two different representations: (1) for risk, ‘danger’ is the central element; (2) for crisis, ‘economy’ and ‘money’ constitute the main components of the representation. The second study investigates the links between the two previously detected structures and their relations with the perceived ability to act in a financial crisis context. Some aspects of social knowledge were found to have an impact on perceived ability to act

Identity Leadership Going Global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) across 20 Countries.

English-speakers sometimes say that they feel “moved to tears,” “emotionally touched,” “stirred,” or that something “warmed their heart;” other languages use similar passive contact metaphors to refer to an affective state. The authors propose and measure the concept of kama muta to understand experiences often given these and other labels. Do the same experiences evoke the same kama muta emotion across nations and languages? They conducted studies in 19 different countries, 5 continents, 15 languages, with a total of 3,542 participants. They tested the construct while validating a comprehensive scale to measure the appraisals, valence, bodily sensations, motivation, and lexical labels posited to characterize kama muta. The results are congruent with theory and previous findings showing that kama muta is a distinct positive social relational emotion that is evoked by experiencing or observing a sudden intensification of communal sharing. It is commonly accompanied by a warm feeling in the chest, moist eyes or tears, chills or piloerection, feeling choked up or having a lump in the throat, buoyancy, and exhilaration. It motivates affective devotion and moral commitment to communal sharing. Although the authors observed some variations across cultures, these 5 facets of kama muta are highly correlated in every sample, supporting the validity of the construct and the measure.College of Graduate Studie

Protective and risk factors of the self-objectification process: a cross-cultural research

L’auto-oggettivazione si verifica quando gli individui si considerano come oggetti da guardare e valutare in base all’apparenza. Le conseguenze psicologiche di tale processo sono state dimostrate da un’ampia letteratura, ma i suoi antecedenti restano poco esplorati. Lo studio indaga i potenziali correlati dell’auto-oggettivazione in una prospettiva cross culturale. 2566 adulti (54% F; età media=33.78; DS=9.15), Italiani (14.2%), Romeni (19%), Polacchi (31.3%), Inglesi (14.3%) e Iraniani (21.1%), hanno compilato un questionario che rilevava: l’auto-oggettivazione (Body Shame e Body Surveillance); l’interiorizzazione degli standard di bellezza dei media; l’autostima; l’influenza degli altri significativi; le caratteristiche socio-anagrafiche e il BMI. I dati sono stati analizzati separatamente per i 5 paesi attraverso modelli di regressione. Dai risultati è emerso che Body Shame e Body Surveillance sono associate ad aspetti individuali – psicologici e fisici – e socio-culturali, il cui ruolo pare variare nei diversi paesi. Nello specifico, variabili chiave risultano essere l’autostima e l’interiorizzazione degli standard di bellezza proposti dai media, soprattutto in riferimento alla vergogna corporea. Al fine di promuovere fattori di protezione che contrastino l’auto-oggettivazione, sembra dunque necessario identificare elementi comuni e specifici dei diversi contesti culturali.Self-objectification occurs when individuals consider themselves as objects to be looked at and evaluated based on appearance. Literature has largely documented the damaging psychological consequences of this process, but its antecedents remain underexplored.The study investigated the antecedents of self-objectification from a cross-cultural perspective. A total of 2566 adults (54% F; average age=33.78; DS=9.15), Italians (14.2%), Romanians (19%), Polish (31.3%), English (14.3%) and Iranians (21.1%), filled in a questionnaire that detected:Self-objectification (Body Shame and Body Surveillance);The internalization of the standards of beauty of the media;Self-esteem;The influence of significant others;Social and personal characteristics and the BMI.Data were analyzed separately for the five countries through regression models. The results showed that Body Shame and Body Surveillance are associated with individual aspects – psychological and physical – and socio-cultural, whose role seems to vary across countries. Specifically, key variables are self-esteem and the internalization of beauty standards proposed by the media, especially referring to body shame. In order to promote protection factors that hinder self-objectification, it seems necessary to identify common and specific elements of the different cultural contexts

Self-Objectification and its Biological, Psychological and Social Predictors: A Cross-Cultural Study in Four European Countries and Iran

Although scholars started investigating self-objectification more than twenty years ago, only a few studies focused on men and even fewer have taken into account the cross-cultural dimension. Our study focused on the antecedents of self-objectification paying attention to the role of biological and sociodemographic variables (gender, BMI), psychological characteristics (self-esteem, perfectionism) together with social and cultural factors (internalization of media standards, influence of family and friends). Self-objectification was operationalized as Body Shame and Body Surveillance. A self-reported questionnaire was administered to 2165 adults living in four European countries (UK, Italy, Poland and Romania) and Iran. Ten regression models were performed (2 per country) to analyse the correlates of self-objectification. Overall, self-objectification emerged as a process affected by factors entrenched in psychological, biological, social and cultural domains, partially different for Body Shame and Body Surveillance. Findings showed the key role of self-esteem as a protective factor against Body Shame across countries. On the other hand, the internalization of media standards emerged as risk factor for both Body Shame and Body Surveillance in the five countries. Taken together, these results underline the complexity of self-objectification and the need to deepen research on this topic among non-Western countries

Stage 1 Programmatic Registered Report: Open Scholarship and Feedback in Applied Research/Understanding the Role of Climate Change in Applied Research: A Qualitative Registered Report

This manuscript is a programmatic Registered Report that is expected to be the basis of two final manuscripts, one of which explores the feedback mechanisms applied researchers adopt in their work and the role of open scholarship in applied research, and the second that focuses upon climate change