Back to basics : Hematoxylin and eosin staining is the principal tool for histopathological risk assessment of oral cancer

Non peer reviewe

Measuring the Usability and Quality of Explanations of a Machine Learning Web-Based Tool for Oral Tongue Cancer Prognostication

Background: Machine learning models have been reported to assist in the proper management of cancer through accurate prognostication. Integrating such models as a web-based prognostic tool or calculator may help to improve cancer care and assist clinicians in making oral cancer management-related decisions. However, none of these models have been recommended in daily practices of oral cancer due to concerns related to machine learning methodologies and clinical implementation challenges. An instance of the concerns inherent to the science of machine learning is explainability. Objectives: This study measures the usability and explainability of a machine learning-based web prognostic tool that was designed for prediction of oral tongue cancer. We used the System Usability Scale (SUS) and System Causability Scale (SCS) to evaluate the explainability of the prognostic tool. In addition, we propose a framework for the evaluation of post hoc explainability of web-based prognostic tools. Methods: A SUS- and SCS-based questionnaire was administered amongst pathologists, radiologists, cancer and machine learning researchers and surgeons (n = 11) to evaluate the quality of explanations offered by the machine learning-based web prognostic tool to address the concern of explainability and usability of these models for cancer management. The examined web-based tool was developed by our group and is freely available online. Results: In terms of the usability of the web-based tool using the SUS, 81.9% (45.5% strongly agreed; 36.4% agreed) agreed that neither the support of a technical assistant nor a need to learn many things were required to use the web-based tool. Furthermore, 81.8% agreed that the evaluated web-based tool was not cumbersome to use (usability). The average score for the SCS (explainability) was 0.74. A total of 91.0% of the participants strongly agreed that the web-based tool can assist in clinical decision-making. These scores indicated that the examined web-based tool offers a significant level of usability and explanations about the outcome of interest. Conclusions: Integrating the trained and internally and externally validated model as a web-based tool or calculator is poised to offer an effective and easy approach towards the usage and acceptance of these models in the future daily practice. This approach has received significant attention in recent years. Thus, it is important that the usability and explainability of these models are measured to achieve such touted benefits. A usable and well-explained web-based tool further brings the use of these web-based tools closer to everyday clinical practices. Thus, the concept of more personalized and precision oncology can be achieved

Measuring the Usability and Quality of Explanations of a Machine Learning Web-Based Tool for Oral Tongue Cancer Prognostication

Background: Machine learning models have been reported to assist in the proper management of cancer through accurate prognostication. Integrating such models as a web-based prognostic tool or calculator may help to improve cancer care and assist clinicians in making oral cancer management-related decisions. However, none of these models have been recommended in daily practices of oral cancer due to concerns related to machine learning methodologies and clinical implementation challenges. An instance of the concerns inherent to the science of machine learning is explainability. Objectives: This study measures the usability and explainability of a machine learning-based web prognostic tool that was designed for prediction of oral tongue cancer. We used the System Usability Scale (SUS) and System Causability Scale (SCS) to evaluate the explainability of the prognostic tool. In addition, we propose a framework for the evaluation of post hoc explainability of web-based prognostic tools. Methods: A SUS- and SCS-based questionnaire was administered amongst pathologists, radiologists, cancer and machine learning researchers and surgeons (n = 11) to evaluate the quality of explanations offered by the machine learning-based web prognostic tool to address the concern of explainability and usability of these models for cancer management. The examined web-based tool was developed by our group and is freely available online. Results: In terms of the usability of the web-based tool using the SUS, 81.9% (45.5% strongly agreed; 36.4% agreed) agreed that neither the support of a technical assistant nor a need to learn many things were required to use the web-based tool. Furthermore, 81.8% agreed that the evaluated web-based tool was not cumbersome to use (usability). The average score for the SCS (explainability) was 0.74. A total of 91.0% of the participants strongly agreed that the web-based tool can assist in clinical decision-making. These scores indicated that the examined web-based tool offers a significant level of usability and explanations about the outcome of interest. Conclusions: Integrating the trained and internally and externally validated model as a web-based tool or calculator is poised to offer an effective and easy approach towards the usage and acceptance of these models in the future daily practice. This approach has received significant attention in recent years. Thus, it is important that the usability and explainability of these models are measured to achieve such touted benefits. A usable and well-explained web-based tool further brings the use of these web-based tools closer to everyday clinical practices. Thus, the concept of more personalized and precision oncology can be achieved.© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).fi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed

Onko nenänielusta löytynyt parillinen sylkirauhanen - päivittyykö ihmisen makroskooppinen anatomia?

Sylkirauhasilla on keskeinen merkitys fysiologisissa toiminnoissa, jotka liittyvät nielemiseen, purentaan, puheen tuottamiseen ja ruuansulatukseen. Ihmisen suurista sylkirauhasista korvasylkirauhanen on kuvattu ajanlaskumme alun aikoihin. Nykyään kolmen suuren parillisen ja lukuisten pienten sylkirauhasten tehtävät, rakenteet ja sijainti tiedetään täsmällisesti. Pieniä sylkirauhasia tai syljentuotantoa nenänielussa ei kuitenkaan yleensä kuvata, vaikka alueelta lähtöisin olevat sylkirauhaskasvaimet tunnetaan. Hollantilainen tutkimusryhmä havaitsi nenänielussa korvatorven aukon läheisyydessä suurena sylkirauhasena pitämänsä parillisen rakenteen potilailla, joita oli molekyylikuvannettu urologisen syövän takia. Nenänielun sylkirauhasiin viittaavat löydökset havaittiin sylkirauhaskudokseen aktiivisesti hakeutuvalla radioaktiivisella lääkeaineella positroniemissiotomografiassa ({PET}). Löydöstä selvitettiin makroskooppisesti ja mikroskooppisesti vainajatutkimuksessa. Siinä ilmeni, että kuvatulla rauhasella on rakenteellisia yhtäläisyyksiä kielenalus- ja pieniin sylkirauhasiin

Does Evaluation of Tumour Budding in Diagnostic Biopsies have a Clinical Relevance? : A Systematic Review

Tumour budding has emerged as a promising prognostic marker in many cancers. We systematically reviewed all studies that evaluated tumour budding in diagnostic biopsies. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane library for all articles that have assessed tumour budding in diagnostic (i.e. pretreatment or pre-operative) biopsies of any tumour type. Two independent researchers screened the retrieved studies, removed duplicates, excluded irrelevant studies and extracted data from the eligible studies. A total of 13 reports comprising 11 cohorts were found to have studied tumour budding in diagnostic biopsies. All these reports showed that evaluation of tumour budding in diagnostic biopsies was easily applicable. A strong association was observed between tumour budding score in diagnostic biopsies and corresponding surgical samples. Evaluation of tumour budding in diagnostic biopsies had a significant prognostic value for lymph node metastasis and patient survival. In all studies, tumour budding was a valuable marker of tumour aggressiveness and can be evaluated in technically satisfactory diagnostic biopsies. Thus, the assessment of tumour budding seems to identify the behaviour of cancer, and therefore to facilitate treatment planning.Peer reviewe

Bilateral Basal Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Parotid Gland: In a Recipient of Kidney Transplant

We report a rare case of bilateral basal cell adenocarcinoma (BcAC) of the parotid gland in a male patient 30 years after kidney transplantation and continuous administration of immunosuppressive therapy. BcAC is a salivary gland malignancy first recognized as a distinct neoplastic entity in WHO classification of salivary gland tumours in 1991. Over 90% of BcACs are detected in the parotid gland. The most important differential diagnosis is basal cell adenoma. Infiltrative growth is the distinguishing feature of BcAC. Administration of immunosuppressive medication to this patient for three decades may have contributed to development of this rare neoplasia. To our knowledge, similar cases of BcAC have not been reported previously

Comparison of nomogram with machine learning techniques for prediction of overall survival in patients with tongue cancer

Background: The prediction of overall survival in tongue cancer is important for planning of personalized care and patient counselling. Objectives: This study compares the performance of a nomogram with a machine learning model to predict overall survival in tongue cancer. The nomogram and machine learning model were built using a large data set from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. The comparison is necessary to provide the clinicians with a comprehensive, practical, and most accurate assistive system to predict overall survival of this patient population. Methods: The data set used included the records of 7596 tongue cancer patients. The considered machine learning algorithms were logistic regression, support vector machine, Bayes point machine, boosted decision tree, decision forest, and decision jungle. These algorithms were mainly evaluated in terms of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and accuracy values. The performance of the algorithm that produced the best result was compared with a nomogram to predict overall survival in tongue cancer patients. Results: The boosted decision-tree algorithm outperformed other algorithms. When compared with a nomogram using external validation data, the boosted decision tree produced an accuracy of 88.7% while the nomogram showed an accuracy of 60.4%. In addition, it was found that age of patient, T stage, radiotherapy, and the surgical resection were the most prominent features with significant influence on the machine learning model's performance to predict overall survival. Conclusion: The machine learning model provides more personalized and reliable prognostic information of tongue cancer than the nomogram. However, the level of transparency offered by the nomogram in estimating patients' outcomes seems more confident and strengthened the principle of shared decision making between the patient and clinician. Therefore, a combination of a nomogram - machine learning (NomoML) predictive model may help to improve care, provides information to patients, and facilitates the clinicians in making tongue cancer management-related decisions.Peer reviewe

Machine learning in oral squamous cell carcinoma: current status, clinical concerns and prospects for future-A systematic review

Background: Oral cancer can show heterogenous patterns of behavior. For proper and effective management of oral cancer, early diagnosis and accurate prediction of prognosis are important. To achieve this, artificial intelligence (AI) or its subfield, machine learning, has been touted for its potential to revolutionize cancer management through improved diagnostic precision and prediction of outcomes. Yet, to date, it has made only few contributions to actual medical practice or patient care. Objectives: This study provides a systematic review of diagnostic and prognostic application of machine learning in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and also highlights some of the limitations and concerns of clinicians towards the implementation of machine learning-based models for daily clinical practice. Data sources: We searched OvidMedline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) databases from inception until February 2020 for articles that used machine learning for diagnostic or prognostic purposes of OSCC. Eligibility criteria: Only original studies that examined the application of machine learning models for prognostic and/or diagnostic purposes were considered. Data extraction: Independent extraction of articles was done by two researchers (A.R. & O.Y) using predefine study selection criteria. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) in the searching and screening processes. We also used Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) for assessing the risk of bias (ROB) and quality of included studies. Results: A total of 41 studies were published to have used machine learning to aid in the diagnosis/or prognosis of OSCC. The majority of these studies used the support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms as machine learning techniques. Their specificity ranged from 0.57 to 1.00, sensitivity from 0.70 to 1.00, and accuracy from 63.4 % to 100.0 % in these studies. The main limitations and concerns can be grouped as either the challenges inherent to the science of machine learning or relating to the clinical implementations. Conclusion: Machine learning models have been reported to show promising performances for diagnostic and prognostic analyses in studies of oral cancer. These models should be developed to further enhance explainability, interpretability, and externally validated for generalizability in order to be safely integrated into daily clinical practices. Also, regulatory frameworks for the adoption of these models in clinical practices are necessary.Peer reviewe

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Head and Neck Cancer : Ready for Prime Time?

The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has received global attention as a promising prognostic cancer biomarker that can aid in clinical decision making. Proof of their significance was first shown in breast cancer, where TILs are now recommended in the classification of breast tumors. Emerging evidence indicates that the significance of TILs extends to other cancer types, including head and neck cancer. In the era of immunotherapy as a treatment choice for head and neck cancer, assessment of TILs and immune checkpoints is of high clinical relevance. The availability of the standardized method from the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group (IIBWG) is an important cornerstone toward standardized assessment. The aim of the current article is to summarize the accumulated evidence and to establish a clear premise for future research toward the implementation of TILs in the personalized management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients